Here's today's question: Worldwide Perfection: Scientists build a massive space station that allows mankind to control the worldwide weather. As a result, there are no more weather emergencies. There are no more droughts or floods or tornadoes, and global warming has been eliminated. However, there is an immediate demand for "perfect" days. Because the weather can be controlled, many people want the weather to be nicer and more predictable. A large segment of the populace wants there to be two specified dates -- April 22 and October 22 -- where every place on Earth would simultaneously experience ideal weather conditions for 24 hours. These two days would become worldwide holidays (ideal for weddings, reunions, outdoor sporting events, and any tourism or traveling that demands meteorological perfection). Every community on Earth would have perfect weather on these two designated days. However, the environmental community claims that this might be risky. There is no precedent for "worldwide perfection," and environmental leaders fear that this could create problems we cannot foresee. "It can't be nice everywhere," says universal weather czar Al Gore. "At any given moment, at least one-third of the planet needs to be dealing with semi-crappy weather." However, no one can specifically prove why this alleged perfection would be dangerous (because it's never happened before). Where would you stand on this issue? Would you want the perfect (yet potentially harmful) weather days?