I guess the supreme court did a lot to suppress that as a hot topic on the agenda during the election, but the fight for LGBT rights is not over by a long shot. Wouldn't you agree that things Candidate's have done in the past will be brought up? Certain stances, regardless of their current relevance, play a roll. Views on LGBT rights are still very important to the people right now, and when you have two different republican candidates with one saying: "The only outcome worse than this flawed, failed decision would be for the President and Congress, two co-equal branches of government, to surrender in the face of this out-of-control act of unconstitutional, judicial tyranny" and another saying: "I also believe that we should love our neighbor and respect others, including those making lifetime commitments. In a country as diverse as ours, good people who have opposing views should be able to live side by side." then that will play a big time roll. The man responsible for that first quote I believe will have to "change his viewpoint" to have a shot. I like to believe right now that America will not vote in someone who is openly against LGBT rights. Could be wishful thinking though. Then you have a guy like Donald Trump tweeting something like "Once again the Bush appointed SCJ John Roberts has let us down." John Roberts didn't even side with the majority vote, you big old buffoon.