Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

USAFChief

Twins Daily Contributor
  • Posts

    36,746
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    580

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by USAFChief

  1. I fear it might already be too late to get a decent discount. The incentives for Buxton to sign such a deal are melting away. His chances of not having an MLB career at this point are down to injury risk.
  2. Right, but we shouldn't hold his youth against him.
  3. Buxton for sure. For as many years as he'll agree to. Sano is a tougher call, but I probably make an offer. I am leery about what security might do to motivation. Rosario, I just let it ride at least another year. Sign Berrios too.
  4. Play hard. As hard as you can. To do less doesn't make you immune from injury, and is an insult to the game.
  5. We get your point, but that's not MLB. As for Molitor, I hope he's better than I think he is. Which is entirely possible.
  6. Sung to the tune of George Of The Jungle, I presume
  7. Polanco' contract is an example of why you DO sign early long term contracts. Even if he completely tanks--which hasn't happened yet--the dollar figures don't hamstring a team. And if he blows up, he's dirt cheap...like Longoria (who as noted above was signed right after his MLB debut). It might be too late for Buxton and Sano, but they probably should already be under long term contract. The only thing that might change that opinion is if Twins management believes financial security would remove Sano's incentive to control his weight.
  8. Mod note: fair warning...personal attacks are out of bounds here at TD. Please stop.
  9. You're not sure why I'm taking the position that birth control is not a constitutional right? Didn't you just graduate law school?
  10. Birth control is by presidential mandate, which is why Trump can "un mandate" it.
  11. so you got nothin in the way of an actual argument?
  12. I still think PJ is a good hire and will be the best Gopher coach since Warmath. He inherited a team that didn't recruit well enough the last couple years. Particularly at skill positions. Let's give him more than two B10 games.
  13. As a private employer, shouldn't you be able to offer any private health insurance plan you think entices people to work for you? Including no plan health insurance at all?
  14. Rosario gets a contract before Buxton? Fire Falvine!!1!
  15. More likely they'll do it because without it they'll have a hard time getting enough qualified people to work for them, which is the better answer anyway.
  16. Then change the constitution. I'm only rebutting Pseudo's idea that there is no constitutional right to own a business--which is certainly true--with the equally true idea that there's no constitutional right to employer paid birth control, either.
  17. It's also not a constitutional right for your employer provided health care coverage to cover birth control.
  18. So then he doesn't want to go back to the seventies. He wants it left up to the umpire, like the rule book calls for.
  19. Ok, I can see that.
  20. Why Lindor over Correa and/or Seager?
  21. Dire Straits. Done and done.
  22. If true, evidence ownership doesn't really care about winning.
×
×
  • Create New...