You might be correct. He might end up a good starter. I think that's wishful thinking, but I've certainly been wrong before. As an aside, I pay no attention to WAR, I think it's junk. At best, if its math, it's questionable math. So while others might be swayed by a WAR based argument, it falls on deaf ears in my case. The innings argument has some validity, except that I think the usage of a good reliever makes up for a lot of the difference, particularly if the relief innings are more dominant.