I would just like to make a couple of points first: 1] Life schedule has prevented me from watching as much of Garver as I would like. So when I read disparaging comments concerning his defense, I completely respect the opinions/observations of others who have watched him perhaps more than I have. 2] Garver is a rookie. Truly great/very good defensive catchers often don't hit. (See Butera). Catchers who can really hit often aren't good behind the plate. Guys like Rodriguez, Mauer, Posse, are really unique and very scarce. I think this comment is a pretty obvious one. That being said, what I HAVE seen of Garver hasn't been poor behind the plate, with a few bad plays I fully admit. (Overall, a dropped ball here and there doesn't concern me as I've seen even the best drop balls). What is there to like about Garver? He has shown, in milb and MLB, that he can throw, that he can hit, and that he has decent pop/power. If he were elite defensively, I think we would have heard raves before now. Again, still a rookie now pressed in to a more prominent role. Is it possible his defense continues to improve? I posted this in the game thread last night, and bring it here now. Since April 1st, the Twins have had 12 games in which they had a shutout or allowed only 1 run. Garver has caught 7 of those 12 games, Castro 3 and Wilson 2 in his SSS. He also caught Romero's 7IP gem last night, but it doesn't meet the criteria. Does this mean he's actually good defensively? Absolutely Not! But I think it's worth noting for this discussion. Someone asked who was pitching in those 7 games. So I went back and looked it up. FWIW, Odorizzi was the SP in 5 of those 7, and Berrios and Lynn for the other 2. Castro is gone. Garver is here. To deny flaws would be foolish. To deny potential would also be foolish. Perhaps Molitor is protecting Garver for the full season length, as has been suggested, or trusting in the defensive chops of Wilson, as has also been suggested, as Garver grows in to a more prominent role. Regardless, I think it's way too early to simply dismiss the potential of Garver. And I believe he should be starting more than Wilson. Far more potential, and he earned the backup job for that reason. And maybe the FO DOES need to go out and bring someone else in. But wouldn't it also make a ton of sense to let him play and see what he really is and can be? I think everyone, FO down to fans already has an idea who and what Wilson is.