Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. I thought it was in teh Reusse column, but that may be his opinion, and not something they said. But I can't think of one other rational explanation at this point....
  2. Love our veterans, providing leadership to no youth, since no youth is on the roster. Admittedly, it doesn't flow easily off the tongue....
  3. This greatly undervalues Gibson. He's healthy, and made an adjustment that worked last year. He would net at least one top 75 player and a high variance flyer. That first player would be in the Twins top three prospects. It also over values Dozier. They couldn't get that for him when he was good, and had years of control left. They'll be lucky to get one guy in their top ten, as many here and nationally predicted would happen when they didn't trade him before. Rightly or wrongly. I also think Lynn would net a top 200 player, around tenth in the Twins'list.
  4. Slashing payroll is pocketing the money.... They won't lose money next year if the payroll is the same, they'll just make less. That was exactly my point. Payroll is going to drop, a lot, I'd guess.
  5. I like a lot of this, other than Mauer. He's done, imo. Thanks!
  6. Mauer isn't good at baseball. And they don't have a second baseman under contract for next year. Or a DH, and the catching is bad. These are all facts. Unless you consider Grossman a DH, I guess. Are these disputable?
  7. You think they planned on punting nearly all of Sano and Buxton time? No way. If so, you trade them for insane returns last year. If they were aiming for 2020, they are really doing it wrong.
  8. No real surprise, they had to get the big number firmed up first.
  9. we're going to nitpick on that? he was the number 1 prospect in the game.....and isn't anything yet. Maybe he will be, but his record looks pretty bad compared to other recent top prospects that have made the majors over the last few years.
  10. Jay's too high. he's 24 and can't get out AA hitters as a RP. Awful pick, and not in hindsight. Stewart? I have no idea, but it's possible he's one of those guys that induces soft contact....we can hope. I have no idea why Jorge was cut, or whatever, even after clearing waivers. must be something....though I always figured he had to move to RP sooner rather than later.
  11. 2B, 1B, DH, C for sure right now....so that's 4 for next year, at least.
  12. trying to distract you from being frustrated by the actual team, I'd guess. consider it a feature!
  13. i think it is the pitchers....but the FO has to make it clear that they don't get to decide, and that they want them to give Garver more of a chance......
  14. Who went down for Slegers? I'm sure it wasn't Belisle being cut....probably a young player....
  15. It's hard to be impressed, given the Belisle decision, and their refusal to use the AAA RP shuttle plan. But, they get 1 more year from me before I really start deciding.....but ya, the results aren't stellar so far.
  16. to be clear, I want Rooker in AAA....I don't know if I care if he's in MN this year, unless the clubhouse gets cleaned out..... btw, KLAW said in his chat today that wanting Lewis in high A was impatience, which was odd because two answers above this he said we are seeing more younger players come up and succeed.....
  17. that extra 7.5MM from the Hughes trade of a draft pick will be pocketed. zero doubt.
  18. i am really shocked that Kepler isn't better....not a ton better, just like. half a WAR better so far this year.
  19. Brett: You’ve always said to be patient with Buxton. Is it okay to officially think this is what he will be offensively for the majority of his career? Keith Law: Buxton has barely played this year. I’m curious what you “officially” think he’s done this season. Logan: Any specific reason the Twins are having so much patience with promoting Royce Lewis? Keith Law: He’s 19. I’d say arguing for a promotion to high-A is impatience.
  20. I found a site that rates the impact of DL stints on teams.....and it does not back up the idea the Twins' problems are "mostly" or even " a lot" about injuries. now, it won't include Polanco, but if he's a 4 WAR player, they lost 2 WAR there..... I don't know if this is a great analysis or a good one, or (less likely) a completely inaccurate one. What it does for me is point out how other teams are doing, which is not something I pay close attention to, as I am more into looking at the Twins than how they compare to other teams.... https://www.rosterresource.com/mlb-disabled-list-tracker/
  21. 3:08 Dansby Samsonite: Has prospect evaluation improved over the years? Are the rates of busts going down in any sort of trackable way? 3:09 Eric A Longenhagen: I think you could argue it’s gotten harder as player development has improved in a way that makes prospects more volatile.
×
×
  • Create New...