Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. No. That's good. But I'm mainly talking about what people are saying they think he will be going forward, which is very different than what they were saying just two years ago. That must not have been as clear as I wanted.
  2. You have tomorrow, or the next day, apparently.
  3. It always amazes me when we look at an exact number pick, rather than a range. He's not been good. He's fallen a lot from what people thought. Most if what I read says he's not a good receiver.
  4. They barely made the playoffs last year... With ESan and Dozier and Mauer playing very well....I think we'll just disagree on this.
  5. I spent a lot of time looking at him, and reading comments all over the web. No one likes him anymore.
  6. And Murphy was awful in AAA. Terrible. Not sure what people wanted, realistically.
  7. How were they wasted? He was average for a catcher. Who would have been better, in their system? Can't disagree more with this post.
  8. Not interested in Swihart, unless he's the second piece, and the first is one hundred times better. They won't play willians or Garver, Swihart is worse. .
  9. Super. We'll never see Wade now. Come on, prove me wrong....
  10. I don't understand either. Reminds me of Kepler, and how the MOY used him that first year....
  11. It's a minor move if he doesn't block Wade.... Another LH? Don't got it at all
  12. Gibson.... He's the one to get you a 50, imo.
  13. Medical necessity is a term used in the healthcare industry. The kinds of things you are discussing are covered. Things that aren't are cosmetic surgery, unless trauma related, and similar items. There are cases where there are disagreements, but that's in the one percent or less area of care. Also, the government would decide.... Just like in universal care. The edge cases are usually about new, untested, treatments. There are also a super tiny percent where the government, and doctor panels, say it isn't necessary, but some doctors think it is. That will exist in universal care also. Same exact cases.
  14. It's not even close. Every citizen gets insurance against going bankrupt. It also breaks the requirement you have a job to get insurance. It also gives people money to spend if the just need a little, and maybe gives them enough for full insurance It is so far beyond Obamacare as not to be recognizable.... Look, I'd love real universal healthcare, but it is not coming. This plan could work. In the old days, when there were moderates in both parties, this passes... Now? Maybe. Maybe. But, imo, universal care had no shot right now. This is also a first step toward that. ... You need a transition anyway. Catastrophic includes everything that is medically necessary, mental, dental, accidents, whatever. I thought I said that..... Did I miss a question? Also, mellow out. It's a message board, where I'm typing from my phone. I'm not blowing anyone off, that should be clear after my dozens of posts in this thread. Maybe my expectations of this as a great communication vehicle are too low....
  15. What if the guys before them are great? I mean, that's basically your argument to some extent.... At this point, they are all major question marks, and pretty much rated the same. It hurts this team a lot how bad, so far, these two high picks have been. If Gordon washes out, that's potentially a very bad streak of number one picks.
  16. Glad they are giving Cave a shot as some here wanted. Now let's hope they give us Garver people, who are really mostly people that think he can maybe be decent someday, what we want too. And wow, Baltimore is bad.
  17. Increases his value, right? Shows he can get an actual ML player out
  18. I'm not sure if the Baltimore team is good. Imagine rooting for a team that won't sign IFA, and refuses to trade players to rebuild....
  19. They won't get universal medical any time soon. Catastrophic is a huge deductible, like fifty thousand. The goal is to avoid bankruptcy. Probably a multi year rolling number. You also want to make all healthcare non profit? That's just not going to happen in one step. My plan is a step. Zero chance your plan passes.
  20. Yes, the VAST majority come out ahead (and I got laid off in November, but haven't forgotten everything yet!). My original plan had more money going into the account, and the ability to use it for education or health care, but I don't trust people not to fall for private schools, and have no HC money again.....maybe it should be for school past age 18, college, technical, other or HC costs. Really, if we covered all newborn costs to age 5, and catastrophic, and gave people money every year, most people would have A LOT of money in that account (possible unintended consequence that college or vo tech is more expensive, but it's hard to see how our current path is any better).
×
×
  • Create New...