Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,385
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    338

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Pacific NW. Portland or Seattle are the leading contenders.
  2. May going down would not encourage me to continue caring about this team when I move this fall.....
  3. If it was so easy to find 2-3 WAR players, the Twins wouldn't keep losing 90 games every season, having zero OF, and signing OLD bad RP to deals......getting rid of guys like Plouffe is not a winning strategy* *assuming he's this good
  4. Making decisions on tenure, not production? Awful idea.
  5. Serious question: If Pinto is as bad at catcher as I'm told, does it hurt Meyer to have him catching?
  6. Ah, then send him down seems like the right thing......
  7. Please don't demote possible parts of the future......why would a team do that?
  8. Trade them for what? And, I don't agree. One of them should be in the bullpen for emergency starts/depth. Since Alex Meyer is showing he's not all that good ...... they need the depth.
  9. Put Nolasco or Milone in the bullpen. This isn't really that hard a choice right now. this is the problem, imo, of having lots of pitchers w/o options, on a team that is not a contender.....
  10. Granite is too old for the level, time to move him up and test him. Meyer. sigh.
  11. Well, this is unexpected. Admittedly, it is only a couple of starts, but still........ I'd put Nolasco in the bullpen now, or Milone, but Pelfrey should stay in the rotation until he proves this isn't a fluke (or, the whole year being a success, which would be awesome).
  12. Ya, don't get me wrong, you can only play the teams you are assigned to play, and the pitchers have been great. My question was about how excited I should be about their future....not at what they have accomplished.
  13. How is the offense in this league overall? Are the Twins' pitchers way ahead, or a little ahead, of the pack?
  14. Fair. I was just checking. I'm not big on signing 32 year olds to 4 year deals.....Signing good 28 year olds to 4-6 year deals? Maybe, but ya, I share your skepticism. Every team will have some 32 year olds, it's the price you pay for having good 30 year olds.
  15. so, basically, never extend any player that doesn't come up by 24?
  16. There is also value in "certainty", if you believe Plouffe is a legit 3B. Knowing you have a 3B is valuable in and of itself, even over the value of having one.
  17. How is it fear? Plouffe isn't old, he's not expensive, he has progressed while in the majors......isn't that the kind of guy to keep around and build around (rather, than say, guys in their 30s that aren't good)? I'd rather Sano stick at 3B, and Plouffe be Zobrist lite.......but I'd be OK with them trying Sano in RF. OK does not mean it is my plan, my preference, nothing more than I'd be ok with them if they tried it.
  18. That would be based on putting Sano out there in the minors and seeing what he can do. Frankly, I have my doubts he can stick at 3B long term, but think it is possible he could in RF. Frankly, I have my doubts about Plouffe maintaining last year, but I think it is 50/50, so I would consider seeing if Sano can play RF, since, I think Plouffe might be a legit 3B. I have zero interest in Sano at DH anytime soon.
  19. If only there was evidence that you could win with great defense, decent hitting, and an elite bullpen.....and if only you could figure out which players might be really good defensively, and you valued that defense the same way (or maybe a discount, because it is harder to measure) you valued offense, and then you signed players based on that.......
  20. Which is how you end up with Bartlett, Kubel, Nunez, et. al. on your bench, instead of actual good MLB players......
  21. Wait, you are complaining about small sample size, then saying 30 PAs this year is more relevant than their careers? I'm confused.
×
×
  • Create New...