Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    46,847
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    330

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. It raises the question, to me, how can you have expanded rosters, have a lot of SP options, and have to start your long term reliever? How can a team that has traded for SP, signed 3 FA starters, "developed" SP, signed minor league AAA SP, graduated the only guy they've drafted and developed into a full time starter......how can that team be stuck starting a career middle reliever? Years into a rebuild, where you've traded two starting OF, drafted numerous pitchers, signed FAs, signed minor league FAs, and you still have a terrible SP ERA, and can't even find 5 starters........
  2. i was more replying to the other comment, saying how awesome the system must be if a guy that won an award is in the 40s.....I get what you were doing, and agree with you.
  3. Murphy is 21 and was playing against HSers......he better be at/near hitter of the year. Not discounting his accomplishments, but saying that a college kid dominated HSers isn't that big a deal, I'd think. This is a list, imo, of guys that have talent, but we aren't sure how much talent really. They are either young, or very inconsistent.
  4. How can a team with this many 4/5 types have Swarzak starting multiple times in September after rosters expand? Mind. Boggling.
  5. Glad to read TR is not pleased with the outcomes this year.
  6. If he's in the rotation to start the season, they are neither rebuilding nor going all in to win, so it will just continue the head scratching lack of commitment to an actual strategy by this team....... Bullpen would be ok with me, but overall, I'd like the bullpen to be filled with young players with options, so they can only carry 12 and move them up and down to AAA.....clogging your pen with old guys that are paid a lot of money (when you are a cheap team) makes no strategic sense. That said, he's signed, so I'd move him to the pen and see if lightning strikes. If you NEED him as a 7th starter, he's there. And, the injury and bad play was predictable, since some of us did predict it......
  7. I'd tell her that she got it from Cabrera, and it was a nice act by him.
  8. Really? You think Dan Cole only cares about child abuse in re: athletes? edit: I just defended one of my least favorite radio personalities
  9. Not sure if this is sarcasm or not, but it gets to my logical fallacy statements earlier, if it is serious.......
  10. do people really think the media wants to destroy athletes in general? Those guys are their meal tickets on ESPN and most tv and newspapers........this isn't some grand media conspiracy. This is a guy that beat his kid, and many people find that repugnant. Should all those people just shut up, and let it keep happening, if they find it evil/wrong/bad?
  11. The media is NOT destroying someone. They did something bad. The media may be making it worse, they may be pushing an agenda, but the people brought this on themselves. And, the old, "people didn't act on something else, so they can't act on this" argument is a logical fallacy. And, no, someone does not need to be perfect to point out that someone else is bad. That is also a logical fallacy. If someone cheats on their wife, are they exempt from point out that slavery and murder is wrong? Of course not.
  12. Agreed on all counts. I mis-read the intent of your post, clearly.
  13. Role models falling can lead to cynicism.....IMO. That's the big issue with them falling, but, I think we do see kids emulate the behavior of role models. Even the mistreatment of other people. Probably not all the way to murder, but we see trash talking, and I have seen / heard kids talk about women badly based on what they have heard athletes say. When the kids were younger, not as they became teens (but then, my kids migrated away from some of those kids, so who knows).
  14. BS this is media created, if that is your point. Media coverage has nothing to do with my (or others') feelings about what Rice and Peterson did (or allegedly did). Nothing at all. And, frankly, in a free society, that is kind of the media's role, communicating difficult issues to people so they can make informed decisions. I suppose we could become Russia, and have the media only tell us stuff the government and big business want us to hear/read/see. I'm not in favor of that, frankly. The media did not hit Rice's wife or Peterson's kid. This isn't about the media at all.
  15. On another board I was on, there was a great debate about authors......can you enjoy an author's work if he/she is a bad human being? Just like athletes, can you root for them if they are bad (in your opinion) people? It is a tough call. I personally can't root for a bad person on a team I like. I am quite happy that my kids aren't really sports' fans much. They won't be burned by stuff like this so much as some of us have been. Kirby and AP were/are two of my favorite athletes to watch/enjoy. This has been a bummer of a week for me, but it has reminded me of why I root for teams now, and not really people.
  16. I think he'll be fine also......but not elite. That's the issue, imo. It isn't a ton of money, so I doubt it matters, but this is why you don't sign RP to long term deals. History has shown this, outside of a handful of outliers.....
  17. He walked the bases loaded. Ugh. He is playing Suzuki right now, and not Pinto. Ugh. He, like most managers, is stuck in the past on managing to the "save" stat. ugh. He pinch runs with two outs all the time, with a runner on first. That guy is very much not likely to score. ugh. He sacrifice bunts early in games too often. He gets mad at the press for asking him strategy questions (part of his job is talking to the press). They have been worse and worse at the "little things" the longer he has been in charge. Ugh. He seems, to me, to prefer plucky veterans over unknown younger players. He appears to be unable to fire one of his coaches, even if that guy is not doing his job well (he is, after all, the manager, not some flunky). That's part of your job, holding others accountable and being able to make hard choices, not just about players, but coaches too. How long of a list do you want, about how people feel about Gardy? There are a lot of evidence and management studies out there in the world, they all say that management needs to be refreshed every 10 years or so......new voices and thoughts are needed.
  18. I don't buy that at all. They are trying to throw their best pitch, regardless of level. Especially a starter. I think that's bunk, frankly. Now, if you are saying it is the number of pitches, not number of innings, that is probably valid. Either way, I'm not worried about the number of innings/pitches this year, I'm worried they were both hurt.
  19. At least 2 more? Ugh. Really ugh. That's a long time to be bad.
  20. But they don't need a better 3B or 2B right now, on defense, do they? And most believe Mauer will be better on D next year. We aren't talking about a vacuum here. Where do you propose they get these much better pitchers next year?
  21. I disagree. It appears easier to find good OF than good SP, if you just look at the counts of them in the majors.
  22. So, if Gardy is only successful when they have great players, and awful when they have bad ones, why keep him? The argument seems to be that the success of the team is largely out of his hands. If so, why keep him around if he doesn't make the team better than they should be?
  23. This is the point I've been making on threads for about 2 weeks....everyone complaining about the defense and how it needs to get better, all while saying they should keep these hitters around. The game has both aspects. Just because a guy can hit (though not at a great level yet) like Arcia, that does not mean he is a good MLB player. If he can't field, and they have Vargas, there is not room for both of them (especially if you have no CF or LF also). I totally disagree this boils down to strikeouts. This boils down to they have terrible defensive players. You won't make Arcia or Santana great fielders by getting more strikeouts. Balls that still should have been caught or cut off will still happen. They need to decide if they are willing to live with terrible defense (and, therefore, a higher ERA than they should have) or not.
  24. So what does he do? If he can only win with great talent, is he actually good at his job, or is he just along for the ride? Good leaders lead, even lesser talent. Good coaches make their students better. I have no idea if he's good or not, but most organizations need new leadership after 7-10 years to remain successful and grow. And, the BS about Smith remains unreal to me......people know it takes 4-6 years for players to graduate from the minors. If there were no good young players in the Smith years, that's because the minors were barren when he took over.....if the minors are now graduating players, those guys were likely acquired by Smith or the beginning of TR's return. The team is going to lose 90+ games for a 4th year in a row. If I ran a company, and the leadership spent lots of money and resources to improve a part of the business, and utterly failed, again, at improving that part of the business, someone would be fired after this much time. Luckily for the Twins, they have tv revenue even if they are terrible.......
  25. I'll ask again, how many 90 loss seasons before the GM or manager or both are not good at their job?
×
×
  • Create New...