I agree with bw.....Smith gets too much blame. If a team is the result of the 4-5 years of drafts before that year....well, those teams were bad because the minors did not product players, frankly. All the pundits that used to work in FO say this: GMs should barely be judged on drafts, since the scouting director leads those. The GM's role is to hire the scouting director, though. Also, to set up the minor league systems....so the GM has to get some credit/blame for development. GMs make the trade decisions. Even if they get advice from others, they are accountable for those, and should be judged on those. Same with FA decisions. Unfortunately for BS, the trades mostly stunk...... Judging him on the outcomes of the roster at the time? Unfair. Judging him on the outcomes of the trades? Fair.