Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    46,996
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    330

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. He can't pitch back to back days .... When would you have put him in, and not been able to use him the next day?
  2. And yet other teams are debuting good pitchers this year.....
  3. Yes.....if they can't find a taker for him, they failed that part of their job. I get it takes two to dance, but come on....also, Pineda (if he's healthy).
  4. That's my theory.....especially if Cruz is dealt (if he's not, the FO failed).
  5. I don't think anyone takes him for free right now. You'd 100% have to eat almost all of the deal to get someone to take him, and at that point, why? I literally believe you could pay, say, 80% of his deal, and get nothing in return for him.
  6. I don't think they've said any such thing. All the posts here are speculation.
  7. I'd look at the Brewers, and want 2 of their 4-6 prospects (2 SPs and a SS are in that range).
  8. Thanks. I'd really prefer the SS to play SS more full time (unless they are on the same roster, I guess).....because that's a HARD position to learn/excel at.
  9. What do people want the owner to do or say? Really? Do people care what an owner says? I care if he funds the team and hires the right front office. Other than that, I like them invisible. I won't miss shoemaker. Bad decision from the start.
  10. I'm still waiting for any evidence they can identify and develop legit pitching. So far, their track record is awful. Truly awful. Not even a legit RP so far.
  11. No they don't. Also, the other side of the coin.... People sometimes think not trading off good players means success. Which clearly is not always true. Not one person is guaranteeing success. What some are saying is there isn't enough here to succeed next year either, and positing ways forward. Some think the team can sign two great players, some don't think those players will stay here. Hence the disagreement.
  12. No it would be better to get a more sure thing in a trade. This team has one starting pitcher signed for next year that anyone trusts. That's not realistic.
  13. I agree.....it is time to move the guys out for the year to another list, or something.....Maybe show two lists....one with active players, then one with those out for the year so people don't ask "what about so and so".
  14. Well, there are likely other deals to be made....that's how you'd compare them. Also, if they keep him, they get the value he provides this year and next....they may or may not also get a comp. pick.
  15. The only one of those that didn't make sense at the time is Nick Anderson. That was baffling. Baddoo? An A ball player with years of injuries? Someone thought a MLB team would keep him on their roster all year? Celestino isn't ready for the majors, but without multiple injuries, he wouldn't be. Way too early to say he's a dud.... I didn't get the Cave/Wade decision, but it is defensible.
  16. And to quote myself and stay on topic.....if you want to get some top prospects, you need to trade players like Berrios. Can you get lucky and get a valuable player by trading a less valued player? Of course you can. I'd only deal Berrios if I felt I couldn't sign him. If I felt there was a realistic chance to sign him, I'd do that......though I don't know their budget or what he wants....
  17. The MLB draft is the least precise of the sports' drafts. It isn't particularly likely that there is much difference in feeling between about 20+ players at the point the Twins pick. People here won't deal prospects for pitchers (not great prospects, certainly not what is required for really good pitchers with multiple years of control, which are rarely traded). The Twins won't sign the highest paid pitchers. Where do people expect to get pitchers if they keep passing on them in early rounds (and don't say "so and so was an 8th round pick"....those are rarities. The value of picks is well established from decades of drafting.....)?
  18. Marcus Stroman was traded for a AAA starter and high A starter (i.e., one of the pitchers above!)......the Twins should expect a similar return for Berrios. They were numbers 4 and 6 (give or take) in the Mets' system when dealt. Fangraphs had a 45+ FV on SWR at the time of the deal..... I think SWR is advanced beyond that now (50FV this year, and in a higher league)....I'm guessing IF they would deal him, you'd get SWR and something around what is projected above....but I don't know if TOR would deal him at this point. IF they Twins don't think they can sign him, it would be a decent-good deal, not one to blow you out of the water, but likely fair.
  19. I'd like to see no corner OF / 1B in round 1-3........But yes, my preference is SS and pitching.
  20. Only 2 teams in the AL have less wins....and people think they are in this? I hope the FO isn't thinking that way. There are zero, zero, starting pitchers in AAA that look like legit MLB starters. They have Berrios for 1 year. They have Ober (a back-end starter), and who? They have Buxton for 1 more year. They have no starting SS next year. Before anyone says "look at AA".......unless those guys get multiple starts in MLB this year, they won't be starting on day 1 in MN next year....And even then, they might have 1-2, might, starters (given the odds of any working out). 2023 is the next most likely good year....so go get some top ceiling pitching prospects.
  21. There were Berrios questions in today's Ben Clemens' Fangraphs chat also.....
×
×
  • Create New...