Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    46,391
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    329

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Boston and the Cubs aren't cutting costs because they don't have enough revenue......MLB teams appear to be owned by owners the least interested in winning of all the sports. (i know you know this, just replying that money isn't really the issue here) Money isn't an issue for most teams, really.....the complete lack of caring if you win, and maximizing profit is the issue (it's an issue if you care about there being better teams, not if you care about the owners making more money, which some here do).
  2. does the capitalist in you believe in teh draft and salary controls and team control of players even if they aren't under contract?
  3. Not according to the owners. The cubs just don't have any money.....
  4. that's how I feel about not buying and holding Tesla......meh. I've doubled my money that I play with, so I can't complain too much.....but 6x would be better.
  5. Schitts creek Escape to the country The boys Gentefied Castlevania
  6. Talked me into some....thanks.
  7. Largest employer in OR.....they better do well!
  8. I came here today only to see if someone made this joke!
  9. Long term I love travel related stocks. At some point, we'll all travel again, regardless of a vaccine or not. Those stocks, the survivors, will go up for sure.
  10. I like: Okta New Relic Shopify Activision Blizzard Amazon Apple Square Slack Zoom (still like them) Pinterest I pretty much like anything that helps with the cloud / internet, remote work, etc. I am TECH HEAVY,
  11. Twelve percent today... Hope you bought it
  12. not pfizer.....fiverr, which continues to plummet.....
  13. Not that I'd ever tell anyone what to do, but I'll type a name here for a random reason. Fiverr.....
  14. Basically for the past 4 months..... I identified 10-20 stocks I like, a lot. Love even. Or, at least the market does. I've bought on dips (as long as there is no news about THAT stock to explain it), and I've sold at 5% profit. This is money dedicated to this effort. I don't recommend this as a strategy for most / anyone else.....but it has worked VERY WELL this year. That's the kind of thing to do with maybe 10% of your portfolio.....the rest should be in long term plays. IMO, of course. As for the "too much money in too few stocks" rubbish. There is plenty of money flowing into the market, across plenty of stocks. There is no bad time to buy, if you have time on your side.
  15. For that reason, I'm not watching college sports this year.
  16. He was in this article...... https://blogs.fangraphs.com/statistical-diamonds-in-the-rough/
  17. Jeffers went right where Fangraphs projected him, as did Lanarch. It's not like teams use 7-10 starters and even more relief pitchers in a year...........
  18. They certainly have a type. I'll ask what I always ask....how long do we have to wait to judge not taking pitchers early? Because you need A LOT of pitchers, and only 1 first baseman.....
  19. Well, I managed to buy two stocks that have gone down the last two days.....so not all day trading works for me....good reminder!
  20. Good for them. The Astros, Royals, and Reds all made pretty much the same announcement today. Well, the Royals really went big on keeping people paid.
  21. they didn't offer a 50/50 split in the future. They also won't open their books to show all their revenue. They asked for a split when revenue was down.....
  22. Player salaries as a percent of revenue are dropping. And, that only counts team revenue, not revenue teams make from owning developments around stadiums, or networks, or other things that aren't part of "revenue". Again, why does the revenue matter? The will provide half their services, why should they be paid less than half their wages?
  23. It's not even close. In a free market, the players could go to any team they wanted. That part is never brought up by those arguing that the contracts aren't "fair" because they get paid no matter how they do. They also never point out that the teams pay them MUCH less than they are worth for the first few years of their time in the majors. Much less.
×
×
  • Create New...