Jump to content
If free agency is too rich for your blood, click here for the 35 players most likely to be traded this offseason. ×
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    48,924

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    That's not the argument some are making, though, is it? They are stating that since they aren't "right" or they change, that the whole idea is bunk...... I'm merely trying to point out that just because a projection turns out wrong does not make the process or math or science bunk, which seems to be most of the argument (not yours, yours is actually about the process).
  2. Mike Sixel
    Suzuki being back =/= doing nothing about catcher......
  3. Mike Sixel
    so if a prediction turns out wrong.....it was the process that was wrong, not the random outcome? I don't think people understand what a projection is....... If a plane crashes, one of them, should someone have predicted that, or should we all realize that it is very likely that any one plane will not crash, and therefore fly?
  4. Mike Sixel
    Doing nothing about catcher.
  5. Mike Sixel
    Wait, we don't use monte Carlo simulation anymore?
  6. Mike Sixel
    This is the same math used to make billions on the stock market......not to mention most economic models used by governments. Oh, and to predict most everything on the planet. I don't get the hatred of math and science.
  7. Mike Sixel
    I don't care about the money. It is the roster space for a rapidly declining player.....
  8. Mike Sixel
    Too bad for Trevor. Millions of dollars are gone as a set up guy.
  9. Mike Sixel
    I have no information. But I would move him to the bullpen full time at this point.
  10. Mike Sixel
    RP that pitch 60 innings are not more valuable than starters......
  11. Mike Sixel
    Win Twins
  12. Mike Sixel
    Other teams don't have this fear of using eventual starters in the bullpen the year before. KLAW and others online, former FO people, are wondering why Berrios isn't here. This isn't an irrational fan opinion.
  13. Mike Sixel
    If they think they are a playoff team, shouldn't he be up here this year? We won't agree on this, but they should be trying to win if they are trying to win, not worry about 5 years from now. And the twenty percent thing is based on junk science.
  14. Mike Sixel
    It is odd, to me, because it is weeks later than it should be. I still think this is about the injury, not thinking the pen is bad. Otherwise the logic is a bit off.
  15. Mike Sixel
    Fair enough. I am with Brock, this was a great idea weeks ago.....now, it seems like window dressing. Which I guess is better than nothing.
  16. Mike Sixel
    Just bought a roku. Anyone have some off the wall suggestions to watch?
  17. Mike Sixel
    Odd. Do they think they are a playoff team?
  18. Mike Sixel
    What? With Mauer, Kepler, Arcia, Sano, and Vargas, this is a question? No.
  19. Mike Sixel
    Negative value is still value, Brock.
  20. Mike Sixel
    didn't Stiel just do an interview saying that across the system they are emphasizing strikeouts? Is kohl exempt from that?
  21. Mike Sixel
    I could vote republican for president......if the congress was not republican. But controlling both? Too scary for me.
  22. Mike Sixel
    He has a much better pedigree than Santana. I think he is a league average OF.
  23. Mike Sixel
    Ridiculed, ripped, roasted? Either way, I am glad they have moved him to his long term position. He looks like a legit prospect.
  24. Mike Sixel
    Bad roster management, no doubt about it. I would love to understand what they were thinking.
  25. Mike Sixel
    No surprise on Polanco. And so many judged those who said so.
×
×
  • Create New...