Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,923
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. They have 3 starters, and he's terrible at defense. They also have Roden, who couldn't prove more in AAA. How does someone prove they are ready, while in AAA?
  2. Agreed. He's nowhere near the top 4 or 5 SP prospects right now, or in the future. This year is toast. Start him on his long term path (you know, like they should have earlier with almost every starter they have moved to RP other than Duran).
  3. Agreed. He's the only one I move on for.
  4. I agree, but the same was said about TJack and Bridgewater..... Some guys just aren't good or mature. I'm fairly sure McCarthy will fail in Minnesota, but I don't like any of the alternatives. So let's see..... But I'm guessing 7-9 wins again, most of them like last year, after other teams have given up.
  5. If you only grade things after they happen, what's the point? And, sometimes things turn out badly, even if you make a good choice (of vice versa). If your pilot decides to use the flaps wrong, do you wait to see if you crash before you know it was a bad decision?
  6. So you're saying there's a chance.
  7. I agree it will be years down the line....if it happens.
  8. Heh. He's got the most upside of any of their options, which says a lot about how few QBs even are alive on the planet. I'm saddened by this. Who could have predicted taking a QB whose college offense was built around running and not using the QB would fail?
  9. Truly mind boggling they tendered him. For a team on a budget, it's a fireable decision.
  10. Other than Burrow, none of the other guys are all that good. No thanks.
  11. We'll know a lot more about the players' thoughts about a cap when the replacement is named....
  12. This sucks. Also, good thing they didn't trade Ryan and start the rebuild more..../s
  13. Which seems bad. There must be someone to sign if the dodgers want money?
  14. They have no catchers, no 1B, and questions in the OF (not to mention they lose two starting pitchers in a year or two). I'm not trading for a SS at this point. YMMV, of course* * I mean, if someone makes a crazy offer, sure....
  15. Just terrible tonight
  16. Maye is not ready for this
  17. Why would anyone trade for a SS of you think Houston or Culpeper is one? They aren't winning this year.... Have patience.
  18. This is why the NFL has rules helping offense. Defense is boring.
  19. Either Burrow or McCarthy should be the starter. No way on trading McCarthy for another low ceiling guy. Just roll with it if you have to.
  20. As I said when they took Lewis....they'll never pay for an elite pitcher, take the pitcher (assuming there is one).
  21. For some reason, my account wasn't deleted, so I came back to see what y'all thought today. I'm good with this decision.
×
×
  • Create New...