Look at the numbers again. Trout had good power, reasonable K and BB rates, bad BABIP luck, overall near league average bat in 2011. Buxton is nowhere close to that. In fact, here is Trout's 2011 season broken down a little further: July, 47 PA: 6.4 BB%, 21.3 K%, .116 ISO, .182 BABIP, 34 wRC+ Sent back down to AA for a few more weeks and had his 20th birthday in August. August/September, 88 PA: 6.8 BB%, 22.7 K%, .200 ISO, .286 BABIP, 115 wRC+ Trout did kind of a classic progression: initially struggle but some decent rate stats and bad BABIP luck , sent back down briefly, came back much better right away. A pretty quick adaptation to league-average or better bat. I think we can all agree that Buxton hasn't done any of that yet, right? I didn't think that was a controversial point.