Exactly. The OPs post said, 'Now the question, was it right to not let him finish or was Gardy right to protect his arm?'. Once a person reads that, they had to know some would agree with Gardy's call and some wouldn't. If you didn't want to see the posts not agreeing with Gardy's decision, why keep reading? Is it so you can complain about the complaining (which of course is okay to do and not the LEAST BIT hypocritical). By complaining about people disagreeing with the call (being negative) you're basically saying, don't answer the OPs question. Maybe it's a reading comprehension issue, maybe people were too lazy to read the OP and didn't know what he was asking, or maybe it's the never-ending quest by some posters to have every post be a cheerleading, ignore the problems, 'positive', glass is always half full kind of place to chat. However it is, if people can't talk about EXACTLY the point of a thread in the thread, then what's the point? Why not just delete the thread entirely and all threads that will lead to someone daring to questions the decisions of Gardy, Ryan and the rest? Anyone else find it funny that no player is off limits to discuss their good points and bad point, but Gardy and Ryan, for some, are off limits less you be deemed 'negative'?