He said exactly what I said. My job doesn't produce data that is used by mlb (it is for other sources for other purposes) so it doesn't even matter what our output is as far as pitch f/x is concerned. What I'm saying is that the exact same pitch can be logged as different types from pitch to pitch and especially from start to start. So if you are looking at different pitch usages from year to year or even start to start, it is from inconsistent pitch logging. I was trying to provide some context for people that are looking at pitch type and potential differences from year to year. They do a very sound job with speed, location and break - because that is the automated aspect of pitch logging. The human part, pitch type logging, is extremely inconsistent. I'm not saying I'm "better" I'm saying their logging often makes no sense, unless you think the same pitch with the same speed and same break should be classified as different pitches. Pitch f/x is fine, but for pitch types you might find more variance than you would think, and it is perfectly possible, if not likely, that Hughes hasn't actually done anything all that different in the comparisons that you are making.