I am 100% on board with this. I hope teams are looking for ways to give themselves an advantage even if it is only slight. However, most people I hear argue against the crapshoot playoffs tell a narrative and then make the facts suit their narrative, rather than letting the facts guide the discussion. This year KC is being successful so of course it's all about bullpen, defense, and solid pitching. When the Yankees are winning in the 2000s all we heard is that the vaunted Braves rotation wasn't good enough because offense wins in October. When it's Philly or San Fran it's all about shortening a series with ace pitchers. When it's the 1991 Twins it's about homefield advantage. I'd be open to someone breaking down the successful tendencies of teams that win the WS to see if there is a pattern, but that's not what happens. Instead people find a way to paint whoever the winning team ends up being as the "right model" when those models often look VERY different from each other. (And, often, very different from what they did for 162 games in the regular season. See the now power hitting 2014 Royals)