Brandon, this is just a continuation of your regurgitation of Twins propaganda, prove that defense is so important. The Twins were, by different metrics, a top 10 team defensively. Didn't seem to help the pitching staff too much IMO. What you're trying to control with a good defense is BABIP, which is a pretty volatile stat. Average pitchers that pitch to contact, or ground ball pitchers, have a lot of balls put in play. By rule of averages, you can only control so much. The BABIP of the MLB (starters) this year ranged from .272 to .324. Guess who had the highest? I can't find the amount of attempts specific for starters, so I can't tell you how many hits would have to be stolen, but it is quite a bit. Combined, in order to drop .030 the Twins would have had to steal 50 hits. I don't think the defense made this staff horrible. The defense was ok. A better defense might have made a few more outs, but when you had Florimon and Dozier having elite years (in the most important positions) you'll be splitting hairs if you think defense is going to going to effect a pitching staff that much. That doesn't mean defense doesn't matter, but if you have guys that are competent at SS, 2b and CF.... you are going to have an ok defense. What is the culprit for the horrible performance of the starting staff? Stikeouts. The Twins had 477 SO, the league leader Detroit (funny they are in the ALCS and up 1-0) had 981. More than double the Twins. That is 500 less balls put in play. Detroit had a .307 BABIP, so by that logic that is over 150 hits the Tigers took away in comparison to the Twins because of strikeouts. Defense doesn't win games. Never has. It helps win games, but it doesn't turn a below average rotation into an average one. Regardless of how elite a defense is, if a pitching staff puts a bunch of balls in play, many of them (.270 to .300) are going to fall as hits. Trying to compensate a poor rotation by getting the best defense possible is foolish.