Criminal Justice is probably not the best arena to adjudicate these kind assaults either--with the high burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt; often the only "proof" is the victim's testimony, and offset by the alleged-abuser's testimony--what tends then to be litigated is not what actually happened, but the credibility of the accuser. Indeed, this is often why abuser select victims with compromised credibility or social standing. When the consequence is not jail time, I think the allegations, with minor corroboration (such as telling other people near the time of the event, the people were in the place she says they were), are enough for the Twins and us--as fans and as a society--to make a judgment. Here, I think we've already gotten the kind corroboration necessary. For those withholding judgment, what more do would you need?