Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

PseudoSABR

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,120

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by PseudoSABR

  1. PseudoSABR
    I mean, I guess if you cook "underperformance" in the recipe, not cutting bait doesn't look great. Lanarch and Miranda had plenty of opportunity and didn't stick, I just don't get why you are against having more darts to throw, because you want to give unknown-outcomes a more significant opportunity. A Rh-ed bat, who can hit lefties, and play good defense was an obvious need for the outfield. Yes, one that Martin may be able to fill, but that's just speculation--hence the need for more darts.
  2. PseudoSABR
    I guess if you just discount defense, speed, and track record. Sure.
  3. PseudoSABR
    Are you really comparing Margot to Garlick, Cave, and Stevenson? Really? You're just guessing that the youngsters will outproduce the veterans with an actual track record in the early months. Imagine last year if we didn't acquire Castro or Famer, because--using your logic--of the belief the likes of Miranda and Lanarch (or whoever) were going to outperform them.
  4. PseudoSABR
    Now you're just making things up. Maybe over the long run those guys will out produce Margot, or Farmer or whoever else you are talking about. But the odds are that we will need many of the players you mention throughout the entirety of the season, as well as the vets.
  5. PseudoSABR
    To those decrying about Martin, Lanarch, and the loss of flexibility on the opening day 26 man: did the Twins suddenly invent some salve to stave off injuries for the entire year? We will see a lot of Martin this year, maybe a significant amount given our team's injury history. Depth matters, as last year showed.
  6. PseudoSABR
    Obligatory. Add in the 5.5 mil, that's at least on paper, very good value.
  7. PseudoSABR
  8. PseudoSABR
    A fine addition, in backing up CF from the right side. Miller didn't have a ML path forward, even if he does end up hitting. I hope some cash is coming our way as well.
  9. PseudoSABR
    Festa #97 at fangraphs.
  10. PseudoSABR
    Obligatory, but meaningless.
  11. PseudoSABR
    Is there any depth beyond Martin/Castro? That's my fear, Buxton getting hurt, one of those two getting plugged in, struggling, with zero depth behind them
  12. PseudoSABR
    No one like replacement level players (though the names mentioned are better than that), until they realize that their system is full of far below replacement level players along with the pixie-dust hope prospects.
  13. PseudoSABR
  14. PseudoSABR
  15. PseudoSABR
  16. PseudoSABR
    Adam Duvall or MAT don't have a place on this team as a part time options? Isn't there TV money incoming? Yeah, no thanks to Kyle Garlick or Jake Cave.
  17. PseudoSABR
    Right handed outfield bat incoming.
  18. PseudoSABR
  19. PseudoSABR
    The additional revenue.
  20. PseudoSABR
    Maybe, and it's still a good deal. The Twins will roster the guy, and let the depth sort itself, which actually has value.
  21. PseudoSABR
    No way is Polanco worth 3 wins more than Julien, Lee, etc at 2nd and the addition of Topa to the bullpen, and adding another above replacement level starter to give more flexibility. Again, those who don't like the trade, what other trade that added wins this year or better future value could be had? It's all just naysaying.
  22. PseudoSABR
    You could be right, with the acquisition of both a starting and relieving pitcher, but it's hard to ignore is production in the bullpen.
  23. PseudoSABR
    Let me get this straight: It's stupid to acquire top 100 prospects (or prospects in general), but it's prudent to hold on to them? Either you value (top 100) prospects or you don't. Even Martin's and SWR's future aren't yet written in stone, and you speak as if they are.
  24. PseudoSABR
    6 million plus more cash? I'm more than very surprised. Let's see where they use those additional funds. Wouldn't be great to see a TV deal announced by Feb 1?!
  25. PseudoSABR
    The Pablo Lopez trade spoiled too many.
×
×
  • Create New...