I keep thinking of what should be a list of qualifications, and when I write them down an awful lot of them can be acquired by On the Job Training. For example: a sense of fairness, a willingness to be out front or act decisively when it's called for, an ability to articulate one's reasons, a knack for (the phrase I keep coming back to) taking a punch gracefully when that's called for, the capacity to re-evaluate and even say "I was wrong" when need be. Also: can they help us construct the next list of candidates? That should be Job One. Probably decisiveness is the hardest of these to learn, and it also may be the most difficult to detect with certainty just from reading posts, game thread or otherwise. A complete absence of one of these characteristics becomes visible with time; I think we've weeded them out instinctively, in the candidates discussed. OTOH none of us is perfect in these, and we've probably all improved in them over time. So I think we have a lengthy list in this thread already of candidates who can be good, and who haven't been eliminated by the above traits, and the key becomes more to do a good job integrating whoever we do pick. Which also means we can be arbitrary about who we do pick, among this crop.