Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    40,784

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    462

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. ashbury
    The winning move was to wish her a pleasant journey.
  2. ashbury
  3. ashbury
    Fedko's path to the majors probably is first base, with only Aaron Sabato standing in his way.
  4. ashbury
    I had a similar issue a few weeks ago because I wanted the next renewal to go to a different credit card. Could not figure out how to change it so I just clicked Cancel then waited until close to renewal and signed up again. The end result was fine, but it did mean needing to remember, and overall wasn't as smooth as one would hope. But ... ya know ... do I want TD spending scarce resources if that's what it takes to improve the interface? Um, nope.
  5. ashbury
    But the warm, sweet embrace of this front office.
  6. ashbury
    My question about outfielders is this: why is Garrett Spain on the AAA roster? They picked him up as a minor league free agent, he's not young, he didn't hit well at AA last year, and he can't fill in at infield positions where they are a little thin at the moment. Without him St Paul would still have five qualified outfield candidates*. Wichita meanwhile is short an outfielder, though their schedule doesn't start for another week so other moves could happen. This whole system seems to be a work in progress. * I am going by the official rosters listed at the respective milb.com websites, and this data isn't trustworthy, given that they have consistently listed Ryan Kreidler as an outfielder for example.
  7. ashbury
  8. ashbury
    Round is a shape.
  9. ashbury
    His minor league resume is almost like Juan Soto's. Uh oh ....
  10. ashbury
    This is great. Can you also give me a heads-up as to the day I should sell short on crude oil?
  11. ashbury
    Finally! Someone willing to speak up with unalloyed optimism!
  12. ashbury
    Pretty ding dang good stuff! I haven't taken any of those through-the-chain-link-fence photos in a while and maybe next year I can make is a priority to get back down there to Ft Myers.
  13. ashbury
    Despite all my snark these past couple of years, I would happily attend this event and enjoy the fun if I weren't 2000 miles away tomorrow (and every) afternoon.
  14. ashbury
    I used b-r.com's Stathead feature to refresh my memory, and the 1998 edition rolled out players like Marty Cordova, Todd Walker, Otis Nixon, David Ortiz, and Ron Coomer (still trying to man the hot corner!). The metrics don't appear to have been kind to them. Let's hope our guys this year don't given them a run for their money.
  15. ashbury
    61. I have no money wagered on it.
  16. ashbury
    Second prize: two pairs of tickets.
  17. ashbury
    So now we need a seventh?
  18. ashbury
    Little known factoids: Wee Willie Keeler was only one inch tall, and Eddie Gaedel was measured by physicians in the negative numbers.
  19. ashbury
    That's fair. But at this writing, it's no longer working for him. I can't tell him what to do, but can only report my own experience. My time in slo-pitch would have been cut short* had I tried it his way. * Er, uh, even shorter.
  20. ashbury
    I believe you're right. I must have been thinking of cases where a 10-day list guy was transferred to the 60-day and the days so far would count against the 60. But if the player wasn't on the 10-day then probably retroactive isn't allowed, and in any case the retroactive portion couldn't be nearly as long as all of Spring Training. I'll trust Zoll and crew to know these rules backward and forward.
  21. ashbury
    Already is. The 60-day comes back into play around the time pitchers and catchers report, give or take. The Twins official roster already reflects his removal. https://www.mlb.com/twins/roster/40-man I believe new assignments to the 60-day can be retroactive to that first day of camp in February, if the injury legitimately dates back to then and they've just been monitoring hoping for improvement. Festa could be such an example, though I'm not sure. It puts a player on track to return to action around mid-April, rather than a full 60 days after the start of the season. Unless rules have changed or I simply misunderstood, either of which is possible.
  22. ashbury
    Also too, the vast majority of Gallo's positive offensive output that season came when his teammates already had secured a lead; his batting average was under .140 when the score was tied or the Twins were behind. As Casey Stengel was reputed to say, you could look it up.
  23. ashbury
    Kody Funderburk turns 30 a few days after the Twins WS victory parade.
  24. ashbury
    Particularly noticeable are the ads for, "be a caretaker". 😀
  25. ashbury
    Last season there were exactly 3 pitchers with 200 IP and they all sported ERAs 3.22 or lower, so the last definition would mean essentially no innings eaters at all, just three aces. Above the 175 IP threshold only Zac Gallen was above 3.81, and his was 4.83, so he just barely missed your criterion for eating innings and all the rest were too good to be called that and were just mid-rotation guys. Above 150 IP there were 70 pitchers, and including Gallen I see 17 guys with ERAs above 4.20. (Keeping in mind that league average last year was 4.15.) I think the mark of an innings eater is that his manager keeps running him out there despite not being hugely successful, so I would suggest changing the point of view to the ERA being a lower threshold and not an upper one for the role. You can pick a different lower bound than the 4.20 that I used for counting purposes above, but in any case there are only a relative handful of innings eaters if you use that number of innings as the lower bound. I might suggest looking also at guys between 100 and 150 innings - too low to qualify for the ERA title - and who compiled an ERA above 4.50. There were 19 guys like that - pitchers who kept getting the ball and who kept scuffling. They were arguably there to soak up a percentage of the team's innings for the year.
×
×
  • Create New...