Thank you Stringer, I respect your opinion. The idea of platooning Kiriloff & Santana was only in the mind of the fans because Baldelli made it very clear before the start of the season that Santana was the primary 1Bman no matter what. That was the marching orders.
Kiriloff played 12 games at 1B, 14 games at DH primarily in the beginning of the season according to the program of keeping him at DH/1B. At this time Kiriloff was perfectly healthy batting .271/ .325/ .471/ .796. On April 25, Kiriloff was stationed in the OF, which became his primary position. On April 25, Santana was batting .143/ .238/ .213/ .451, prior he was as bad as (.098/ .196/ .122/ .318) on April 13, At the same time Kiriloff was batting (.324/ .381/ .649/ 1.030). When Kiriloff was stationed in the OF for good on April 25 IMO he far exceeded Santana's production. I don't think that Kiriloff wasn't working out at 1B, he was excelling, during his time at 1B.
Santana may be our best defensive option at DH but should that be the governing factor to start him there? Absolutely not (sorry for being sarcastic, but I wanted to drive home a point). Unlike catching, defense isn't the deciding factor to come up with a primary 1B. Besides Kiriloff, Miranda has been well out-mashing Santana, that tandem would be awesome, especially looking at Santana's difficulty against RHPs . If Santana hadn't monopolized the time at 1B our other younger & more productive options would have become better. Now if Santana regresses to prior levels or gets injured (which is very possible) that lack of playing time of our other options just puts us in a much less desirable situation. $5 MM isn't much by today's MLB standards but if you're at your limit it's a lot, especially if it keeps you from filling a desperate need.