Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Dantes929

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,166

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Dantes929

  1. Dantes929
    I won't feel good about the rotation if we sign Odorizzi and Pineda but I will feel a lot better. I have no illusions that we are going to sign Cole or Bumgarner. The other names thrown out there are not as good as Odorizzi or Pineda. I am ok with relying on our young guys and actually want us to rely on them to fill a spot, just not 4 or 3 spots and preferably not 2 spots. I just feel like Dobnak, Schmeltzer and Graterol are just as good and potentially better than the guys listed in this post. I thought Lynn and Odorizzi were very good signings in 2018 even though they didn't work out that year. If we can find another guy like that along with Berrios, Odo, Pineda and Dobnak it will exceed my expectations and yeah, I would then feel pretty good about the rotation.
  2. Dantes929
    Add Delmon to the list. I never thought Grossman was bad but Gold Glove consideration?
  3. Dantes929
    I figured this is what you were thinking and it really concerns me. Why are people assuming we will keep Odorizzi (and Pineda). I will feel much better when they are signed even if that is all we do. Its not ideal but my fear is losing those two and replacing them with two lesser pitchers and still having to rely on Dobnak, Graterol to fill two spots.
  4. Dantes929
    Not Odorizzi? I thought he was better. I also assume Johnson works with the relievers but I can't really say for sure what effect Johnson has had. I do think coaches CAN and often do have more impact on a team than managers but it is really hard to judge the impact. Consider that Rick Anderson was once considered a top pitching coach. Hitting coaches have the same ambiguity. They should have some positive impact or they shouldn't be employed. However it is hard to believe that several years ago when our backup infielder was by far our best hitter and everyone else was performing at career worst levels and this year when we set offensive records that the difference is the hitting coach.
  5. Dantes929
    Ok sure. Pineda, Berrios, young arm. That's three. Who are the other two? As far as Rosario goes, what makes him a bad outfielder? Below average speed? Bad routes? Bad glove? I used to think he was a great left fielder a few years ago. What happened?
  6. Dantes929
    I believe in chemistry but it has nothing to do with race, age, position or experience. It has to do with individual and collective attitude. I was on a team once with 2 players I knew to be generally negative people but the rest of the team had positive, upbeat and supportive people and the two negative players bought into it and we had a great season. The next year we lost a couple of the upbeat players and added a couple of talented but negative players and with the two negative players we already had the balance shifted from upbeat and supportive to sulking, criticizing and finger pointing. We lost in the first round but who cares? Its not a team I enjoyed playing with even when we won. Now a team full of Nick Punto's is not going to beat a team full of Delmon Young's over the long haul but given equal talent the upbeat supportive team will probably beat the sulking fingerpointers. Does it matter if you fail and you have teammates that say "nice try, you'll get em next time" vs a negative or no comment at all? I think it does. Has nothing to do with diversity of demographics. It just has to do with are you a good teammate or not.
  7. Dantes929
    Sorry. #1 draft pick before he matured and became dominant and I might add coming off a decent season in 2015 and so so season in 2016 with a losing record and a NL WHIP worse than Berrios, Odo, and Pineda this year. That is kind of the definition of diamond in the rough. Diamond being the #1 pick. Rough being someone according to one of the writers here that could have been obtained by after the 2017 by Nick Gordon and a lesser prospect.
  8. Dantes929
    Yeah, the actual quote ini the MVP article was "Eddie Rosario, last year's Twins Daily MVP recipient, received only one sixth-place vote, despite putting up 32 home runs and 109 RBIs. The misleading nature of his raw totals didn't fool our panel" Maybe not hate but totally dismissive of his contributions. I defended him there and will add here that he has an OPS in the playoffs of 1.103. That wasn't powered solely with 1 meaningless home run.
  9. Dantes929
    I don't know. Cole was the diamond in the rough less than two years ago. I'd like to find the next one. There are probably a few.
  10. Dantes929
    Did I miss something? Have we signed Odorizzi and Pineda already? If Wheeler and Buamgartner aren't better than Berrios then they are not better than Odorizzi and proebably not better than Pineda. Get Odorizzi and Pineda signed, then get one of those other guys and roll with Graterol or Dobnak. Then get one good reliever. I ask for this with knowledge that the likelihood is they will do less. Asking for 2 or three aces every year ignores the history of what the team has done, ignores the fact that there just aren't that many top tier pitchers and ignores the fact that there are 29 other teams that also want quality pitchers. My fear is that there are a couple dozen GM's that are targeting the same guys mentioned on this board including Odorizzi and Pineda.
  11. Dantes929
    I think I had Kepler as my number one a few weeks ago and also said there should be a little more love for Odorizzi. I am curious about the "misleading nature of his raw totals didn't fool our panel" comment about Rosario. I probably don't have him real high either but more because of the performance of the others rather than his performance. No matter how you cut it 109 RBI is a lot. His defense wasn't great but he still had the best and most crucial throw of the season. think he deserves a little love.
  12. Dantes929
    Well, major driver of course but if the pitching is top 10 and the defense is bottom 10 I think we can make two assumptions. First is the bottom third defense is the reason the Twins moved to middle of the pack in run prevention and 2nd that If we had a top 10 defense we would also have a top 10 for run prevention. Run prevention being the major goal. The staff gives up 4.18 runs so of course that is the major driver but if the defense turns that 4.18 into 4.65 that if pretty significant. Somewhere in the neighborhood of 8 wins a year. Every team has unearned runs but the difference between the Twins and the good defense is about 4 games a year give or take a few. For example, bad defense vs good defense was probably worth about 6 runs against the Yankees. Good chance we would have lost those games anyway so you could make the case that there was no impact on the outcome. However, if the offense and pitching were better it would be conceivable that bad defense vs good could have cost us all three games. Thats without even considering what good defense vs bad means to the pitcher.
  13. Dantes929
    More power would be great but I don't think it is essential. I compare and contrast to Ben Revere. Revere was a .320 hitter in the minors and a .287 batter in the majors. Pitchers did go after him because of the lack of power but he wasn't as disciplined as Arraez taking around 5% of his at bats for walks. His .287 average was better than average didn't play great because his OBP was only .319 and with no power. I always figured Revere would be a very useful player if he could get his OBP up to around .350 but he couldn't. Arraez has taken nearly double the rate of walks and is already 70 points higher in slugging percentage. Lets not talk about him as if he has no power. There were 15 guys with 200 at bats and Arraez OPS was 6th on the team ahead of Cafe, Castro, Adrianza, Turtle, Gonzo, Buxton, Kron, Rosario and Schoop. Its not great power but if pitchers attack the zone with the sole intention of not walking him the guy will hit .360 with an OBP of .410 and 40 doubles and 6 homers. It is still in their best interests to pitch to the edges to keep him down to a very useful .320 avg and .360 OBP
  14. Dantes929
    Buston won't make up for the whole defensive deficiency but he can make up for the outfield deficiency. Much like getting one good pitcher aids in slotting every other pitcher getting one great center fielder has a trickle down effect as well. Now Kepler becomes a good right fielder instead of a mediocre center fielder and plugging in a mediocre right fielder. I truly believe the infield guys can get better with instruction, hard work and pride. If we really think Adrianza has become a good hitter do we believe he can be average or better defensively at shortstop? I think I would like to see Polanco upgrade 3rd base, Adrianza upgrade shortstop and Arraez get better at 2nd. Rocket arm helps at 3rd but I would rather have agility and a quick release..
  15. Dantes929
    Fingers crossed on Graterol.
  16. Dantes929
    Kepler isn't 6'7 with a 7' wingspan on a liner with short air time. I'm not sure any other right fielder in the history of baseball makes that catch. I might be overstating it but that was what I thought when seeing it live.
  17. Dantes929
    Yeah, I mostly agree. I just think the Yankees took good at bats, they played good defense (Judge is the only right fielder in baseball that gets that Sano liner), and they pitched well. They played all phases well with respect to their abilities. Twins did not defend well, they did not pitch well and they did not hit well (how many 3-2 counts did they swing at ball 4?) They played all phases below their abilities. I just don't buy that they were out manned so much as outplayed. I would prefer a #1 that is better than Berrios but if Cole can't find his best pitch like Berrios couldn't find his curve ball or can't find the plate like Littell then he is not going to singlehandedly win anything. We saw that with playoff veteran Greinke. That's baseball and that's the playoffs.
  18. Dantes929
    I think I counted 6 runs or so against us because of bad defense. We scored 7 runs in 3 games. Tampa scored a run per game better against a much better rotation than the Yankees.. Nationals scored 2 runs a game more than we did against a much better rotation. We scored 4, 2 and 1. Pitching wasn't good but there were plenty of other reasons we lost in the playoffs. I agree that Polanco could be a good choice for 3rd. A rocket arm helps but mobility and quickness are just as important.. How do we feel about Adrianza? He was really quite good with the bat this year. Do we like his defense at short? Polanco at 3rd, Adrianza at short, Arraez at 2nd and Sano at 3rd with Gonzalez backing up seems better than what we currently have.
  19. Dantes929
    I'm not full on board with defensive metrics but that is really bad. I more or less agree with you. The team focus should be pitching. The individual focus should be improving their defense. I am a believer that talent is a big part of defense but that skill is huge also. You are born with the talent, you develop the skill. I mentioned Crede before but I think there are a lot of guys that became good defenders by focusing on the fundamentals, taking lots and lots of reps and just working hard at it and taking pride in it.
  20. Dantes929
    Sano made a fantastic play in the 1st inning of game 1 to keep that inning from being big. The two biggest defensive plays in my book were the pop fly that Arraez didn't get to and the double play relay that wasn't caught. I would even put Cave's completely futile dive in left field that allowed the 2nd run in game 3 way ahead of anything Sano did defensively. Twins could slide Arraez to 3rd and keep Schoop until Lewis. Or count on more reps from Sano to help him improve. I remember Joe Crede and others were considered liabilities defensively early and then settling in to be quite good with experience.
  21. Dantes929
    If Cave's does'nt make a ridiculous dive that came up 6 feet short reminiscent of this play then Odo only gives up 1 run against the Yankees. If he had 4 more inches of vertical then Odo gives up 0 runs. That really shouldn't come too strongly into play in the Offer. Nick Blackburn pitched great in game 163 and also great in his lone game in the playoffs against the Yankees. The reason you resign Odorizzi if you can is we only have Berrios and maybe Dobnak slated to be starters next year. I am a fan of bullpen games but you can't have three of them every time through the rotation. One year contract prices mean nothing to guys looking for multi year deals so you don't worry about qualifying offer. In fact Trevor Bauer has stated his plan to only make one year deal once he hits free agency which would maximize his earnings if he stays healthy but also not bad for a team that would only be paying a premium for actual current production.
  22. Dantes929
    Thanks for the correction. I misread his stats. You are correct. He may be one of the rare suck to start the contract and then do great on the back end guys.
  23. Dantes929
    He was paid market value for performance he hasn't come close to in the last two years. I was already thinking, I wonder what it would take to get Darvish. I don't think you would need to part much in way of prospects and was also thinking the cubs might pick up part of the bill to get out from under. Worth a flyer anyway.
  24. Dantes929
    I would like to see Kiriloff come up and replace Cron. Resign Odorizzi and Pineda if possible. If Dyson were healthy I would say the bullpen is maybe done but instead we need to replace Dyson equivalent. If we can sign Odorizzi and Pineda then adding one more Odorizzi or Pineda type or better would complete the off season. Cole would be ideal.
  25. Dantes929
    Lynn and Sanchez would have looked good to me in Twins uniforms this year and you should probably add Odorizzi to the list. Hughes was great for a year also.
×
×
  • Create New...