Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

jkcarew

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,091

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by jkcarew

  1. jkcarew
    Many of us may think that Julien is a potential all-star level hitter. But, Rocco gives every indication he thinks Julien’s ceiling is Randy Bush. He might be right and he might be wrong…but how will we ever know if he’s wrong?
  2. jkcarew
    Nice game overall for the bats…and also the bullpen. (The bullpen was good in both Brewers games.) Nice win. The good: I liked the decision to go with Stewart and Jax in the 7th and 8th. Good job of adapting/reacting to the circumstances of the game as it unfolded. Something that Rocco hasn’t necessarily been great at, IMO. The bad: The top of the 4th inning was an embarrassing clown show…all on Rocco. If you’re replacing your leadoff hitter in the 4th inning…in itself, highly questionable…and do so with a mediocre hitter (being kind), a guy who feels his best chance to drive in runs with two outs and the bases juiced, is to try to score the guy from 3rd with a perfectly placed bunt…well…clown show. The fact that the pitch hitter showed zero confidence in his own ability to drive the ball for a base hit (that probably scores TWO runs) and instead bunted on his own, makes Rocco look WORSE, not better, for having put him in there in the first place. In the 4th inning.
  3. jkcarew
    This looks like a situation where the “save” happens in the 8th inning. Or we score a bunch more runs. I’m fine with either.
  4. jkcarew
    I’m reminded… 2-out 3-run homers are good.
  5. jkcarew
    Other than that one swing, he seems to be very much in acclimation mode at the AAA level. 6 K’s in his first 13 PA, and zero BB.
  6. jkcarew
    So Varland is #4 and Paddack is #5? Or did Rocco make up his mind that he was going to use all five (even though he wouldn’t have “needed” to) on this pass as a ‘tryout’ for the 4th spot going forward?
  7. jkcarew
    Buxton swinging it pretty good. Unfortunately, he’s not getting the ball in the air. In the past…in the stretches where he’s making hard contact…the HR’s have come in numbers. It’s a problem he’s never had. Still, it’s only a problem because nobody else is hitting much of anything. Hate to say it, but I don’t think this lineup is going to win many games by spraying singles and doubles all over the place. And I don’t think we can just ride the starting pitching, either. Power needs to kick in.
  8. jkcarew
    The FO will believe it when they see it. And then they’ll say we “competed”.
  9. jkcarew
    Come on, man. 4 games,,,one in which he got on base twice and another where he doubled and scored a run. Also, only 3 K’s now in 14 PA.
  10. jkcarew
    And yet, you can win 85 games (with an ALC schedule) and hang ALC pennants doing this. Which, sadly, is the goal of this organization.
  11. jkcarew
    Pitching ended up giving us a chance. Batters didn’t take them up on the offer. Shocking lack of power through 4 games.
  12. jkcarew
    NOT the Joe Jackson that I was expecting.
  13. jkcarew
    I might feel different if it was with a good hitter.
  14. jkcarew
    So Varland is #4?
  15. jkcarew
    I’d like to THINK their due diligence processes were competent enough to pick up on Mahle’s arm health…but Hajjar (well regarded at the time), Encarnacion-Strand, AND Steer…that hints otherwise.
  16. jkcarew
    I think this is a pretty good take on it. Probably not a “bad” deal in a vacuum (we’ll see). But not what was indicated nor expected or desired for a contend-now team.
  17. jkcarew
    I agree…this was different. We actually KNEW this pitcher was broken BEFORE we acquired him. But how again is that supposed to make me feel better??
  18. jkcarew
    I miss the days when just Buxton…(and a recently acquired arm, of course)…were the only ones on the IL. Much simpler times.
  19. jkcarew
    The Vernal Equinox is in the rear view mirror, my friend. Your only job now is to avoid any sudden movements or shifts of weight that could knock the earth’s axis off its 23-degree angle. And I don’t want to hear any excuses.
  20. jkcarew
    Spahn and Sain then pray for rain?? Lopez and Ryan then lots of cry'in. (I hope it never catches on.)
  21. jkcarew
    Love watching Ryan pitch. Just keep keeping the fly balls in the park.
  22. jkcarew
    But he was ok to pitch on the back fields (as reported by TD)? And he’s suddenly OK to go this weekend? Doesn’t make a ton of sense to me. The good news is that regardless…he’s getting paid.
  23. jkcarew
    It’s evident the organization respects what he’s done, and who he is. Agree he’s easy to pull for. Still, seems highly unlikely he gets back into major-league plans any time soon. He’s not rostered and wasn’t included among a host of non-rostered pitchers that got spring training invites. I think it would take something truly extraordinary to unturn this page.
  24. jkcarew
    4 catchers and 2 outfielders. It’s a bold strategy, Cotton……
  25. jkcarew
    Great premise for satire! But wouldn’t the Twin’s opening day tradition be placing at least one key player on each of the 10, 15, and 60-day IL’s?
×
×
  • Create New...