It's not about showing the pitchers anything, it's about him being so bad behind the plate that MLB pitchers complained about him. You're letting the tail wag the dog here, Mike. If Pinto is *so bad* that pitchers don't want to throw to him, you can't convince them otherwise unless he has *actually improved* as a catcher. Given that we're all of 15 games into the season, it's unlikely that has happened. If Pinto has improved, I'm all for calling him up immediately but we, as outsiders, have absolutely no way to measure his current ability behind the plate while the Twins coaching staff gets to watch him every day. Suzuki may be bad behind the plate but Pinto was worse. Don't like Suzuki's -1.43 pitch framing calls per game? Then take a gander at Pinto's -3.06, one of the worst in baseball last year. Suzuki was -149 calls in 8106 chances. That's bad. Pinto was -81 in just 2076 chances. That's horrrrrrible. Couple that with pitcher complaints, questionable pitch calling, and the eyeball test and you have yourself one of the worst catchers in baseball. Yet some think he should be handed the job simply because they think he's "ready" just because he's swinging a hot bat. I don't get it. I'm all for considering Pinto as a backup catcher option now that it appears the Twins need help at DH but I'm not going to fret if the Twins think he's better served by staying in Rochester right now to work on his awful defensive game. But that opinion comes with the realization that Pinto could do significant damage to an already-shaky pitching staff, even as a backup starting only twice a week. I think that's an acceptable risk given the Twins' weaknesses and ability to compete in 2015 but no way can I advocate Pinto as starter until he has proven he is capable of being even a "bad" catcher, which would be a pretty significant step up from his 2014 ranking of "OMG awful".