True, the front of the rotation was better in 1987 but the entire pitching staff was bleh in the ALCS. The Twins won through a bit of dumb luck and some really mediocre pitching. They hit their way to the WS (where the pitching staff improved a bit). And that's my point, really. Both the 1987 and the 2017 teams match up pretty closely. A strong offense and meh pitching. But the road to a World Series championship is a lot harder in 2017. The Twins need 12 wins to get there versus just eight in 1987.
Not really. The 1987 team's pitching staff was pedestrian (99 ERA+) and not terribly different than this season (96 ERA+). Whereas this year's offense (103 OPS+) is actually slightly better than the 1987 squad (97 OPS+). The 1987 squad simply wasn't very good. They got lucky and hot at the right time in an era when eight wins nets you a championship.
It appears random variance, at least from a glance. Archer has been relatively consistent with FIP/ERA over the course of his career and the Rays are a good defensive team.
Agreed. This team is good/decent. My point is more that "good/decent" teams can go on short losing streaks pretty easily (hell, even very good teams can do this on occasion, see the Dodgers), especially teams that rely on offense as much as the Twins do. But with a bunch of teams with middling/good records, any one of them could turn hot or cold over 15 games, which would define their season. That's my concern; not that the Twins are vastly inferior to anyone else competing for the WC spot.
Thankfully, three of those teams are in the AL West and they all play each other down the stretch. That decreases the odds of going on a tear and passing the Twins.
This team managed to get though something like ten games in nine days and did pretty well IIRC. And they did it in August with a 25 man roster. I'm not worried about the games played or the opponents. I'm simply not convinced this team is very good, which can result in short losing stretches (to be fair, they're not very bad either)
Palka is a left-handed batter who finished his AAA season with a .759 OPS. There's no place for him on a team that's trying to win in September. Granite/Palka would be a huge downgrade from Rosario/Grossman. You gain a little defense with Granite but lose a ton of offense. With Palka, you probably remain defensively neutral (Palka might be worse than Grossman) but again, likely lose quite a bit of offense.
Hard to call Smith "rounded". He was stellar at two skills (defense and baserunning) and pretty bad at the rest. edit: huh, never realized Smith was as disciplined a hitter as he was.
Just for fun, here's a comparison using bWAR: Mike Piazza had a career best bWAR of 8.7 in 1997. Ivan Rodriguez had a career best bWAR of 6.5, also in 1997. Which player had the better season? It's not as easy as just spitting out a number, as Pudge was one of the all-time greats behind the dish while Piazza was one of the all-time jokes behind the dish.
Weird stat to note about Escobar. While his 2015 and 2017 seasons look very similar in BA, OBP, and SLG, how he got there is really strange. 2015: 31 2B, 4 3B, 12 HR 2017: 13 2B, 4 3B, 15 HR *scratches head*
While I agree in principle, WAR is notoriously awful at measuring catcher defense. And by most regards, Mauer was at least passable, if not very good (by the time framing came around, Joe was getting a bit long in the tooth for a catcher so it's hard to say what he was like in his mid 20s).
I meant win two of the three remaining games. A sweep would be great but just win three out of four and go home. That will be enough to stick a fork in KC's postseason chances.
If he's an .800-.850 OPS player in 2018, there's a better than even chance he rejects the QO and someone gives him $70m+ over 4-5 years. And even if you're "stuck" with him, you have an .800-.850 OPS second baseman on a one year contract.
If this is who Dozier is going forward and the market remains soft on second basemen, riding out the contract and giving him a QO seems the most logical route to take.