Brock Beauchamp

Agreed, especially given that the MLBPA rejected MLB's schedule proposal, which means the 2021 season will revert to the normal five postseason berths per league. The White Sox are expected to make *huge* strides this season and they were already pretty good last season. The Twins could easily win 92 games and miss the postseason entirely. Go get Paxton or Odorizzi. Make it happen, no team is going to coast to the AL Central title in 2021.

Using baseball's historical position usage isn't a great argument, as we've found out baseball was really wrong about fielding for a really long time. The fact that baseball put bad fielders at the corners for decades didn't change that it was a bad idea or that huge gains couldn't be found by using more athletic players at those positions, as we've seen most smart teams utilize in the past few seasons. Players like Delmon Young just don't make it in MLB anymore because they require monster offensive stats to compensate for their defensive incompetence. Manny Ramirez would be a dedicated DH/1B today because he's losing so much value in the field with his -30 (!!!) UZR/150 numbers. Outside of one season (2019), Rosario wasn't a terrible fielder but he was pretty bad. All I'm saying is that the 2021 Twins will need less offense from LF because their starting left fielder is going to make up some ground defensively from what Rosario has brought to the team in recent years. Just plugging in Cave is probably worth somewhere around half a win defensively and Cave is actually pretty similar offensively to Rosario, though Jake needs to be protected against lefties much more than Eddie so some kind of platoon would need to be used. Rosario's OPS+ from 2017-2020 is 114 and Cave's career OPS+ is 107. Outside of the required weak-side platoon, we can reasonably expect Cave to be similar in value to Rosario in 2021, never mind the potential gains we could see from one of the top minor leaguers if one of them hits the ground running. After all, Keith Law has Kirilloff ranked *seventh* in all of MLB on his prospect list.

You're looking at his 2020 stats, where High Leverage was a meager 39 plate appearances. His career number is a fair amount lower at 91, using a sample size of 539 plate appearances. And I don't think anyone here is undervaluing Rosario's bat - he's pretty good offensively and maybe slightly above average for a corner outfielder - but offense is only part of the game and Rosario is pretty bad at the other half. If Kirilloff (or Larnach or Rooker or whomever) can post an OPS+ around 100 and play better defense, they're likely of a similar value to the Rosario we've seen the past couple of seasons. My over-arching point is that the Twins are likely a better team with Happ (or Simmons, choose either) and Kirilloff for the same money as Rosario.

High leverage is based on Win Probability Added, meaning the win expectancy of the game based on a single plate appearance. A PA in the second inning of a 6-0 game is extremely low leverage while the game literally rides on a two out, bases loaded PA in the ninth inning behind by one run, making that PA worth *a lot* in WPA. And Rosario didn’t fare particularly well in high leverage situations, meaning that he didn’t perform very well in plate appearances that dictated the outcome of a single game.

Tesla is definitely overvalued but they still pour a MASSIVE portion of their revenue into R&D. While they need the offsets right now, it's a big assumption they will continue to need them in future years as they roll out more mass-market BEVs like the Model Y (just gaining production momentum now) and Cybertruck. As they increase production across more models, their R&D costs should decrease proportionally, by a lot. And there's no sign of Tesla slowing down, they're extremely well positioned in the market and everyone else will be playing catchup for a minimum of several years. The only company I thought could challenge Tesla in the short- to mid-term was GM but after releasing the promising Bolt 5+ years ago, they sat on their hands for years. I don't get WTF they were thinking but that's an entirely different conversation.

I never fully understood why so many believe Rosario is a better player under pressure. We can all certainly agree that Eddie is an intense player but given his plate discipline, or rather lack thereof, I'm not sure an "amped up" Eddie is a good thing and could make a minor argument the opposite is true. Career OPS+ of 100 as a baseline for the following career stats (lower is worse than overall career line, higher is better than overall career line): RISP: 98 Bases Empty: 102 Men On: 98 2 outs, RISP: 85 (yikes) Late & Close: 104 High Leverage: 91 All of those "clutch" stats have Rosario as a worse hitter than his career line, excluding Late & Close. Which makes sense as a spectator who has watched Rosario for many seasons. While he certainly had some very memorable moments, I also remember watching him miss a head-high fastball before walking back to the dugout or rolling over on a bad first pitch in a critical situation countless times. Guys with little to no plate discipline certainly get a lot of opportunities to make an impression - which Eddie must have done for many here - but when combined with all those bad, mostly forgettable plate appearances, his numbers in the aggregate suggest he was mostly neutral in critical situations and pretty bad in a few critical situations.

B-Ref had them tied in rWAR last season while fangraphs had Lindor a full win higher in fWAR. And it was a shortened season that had Lindor well down from his typical offensive season and Rosario a tick above his typical offensive season, which is to be expected in a season that short under such conditions, and it’s probably not a good indicator of future performance. I put much more stock in the 2018-19 numbers which tell us Lindor is a significantly better hitter and a vastly better player. Now in dollars to performance, that’s a rather different argument but something well outside a field performance comparison, which was the initial comment I responded to.

Lindor is a slightly better hitter, plays a premium position, and plays it *much* better than Rosario does his non-premium position. While Cleveland needed a corner OF (for like three seasons running) and Eddie fills that role just fine, he is in no way, shape, or form a replacement for anything about Lindor, who is better at pretty much everything baseball.

Since you seem to know everything about me, you surely know that I’m actually quite a fan of Rosario but I’m also smart enough to realize that paying for mediocrity at a position of excess is not something successful mid-market teams do on a regular basis, as it’s generally poor use of limited resources. I have no desire to see Rosario leave the team but using Rooker/Kirilloff/etc in his position and utilizing that additional $7.5m to acquire another player at a position of need likely means the Twins are a better team than they are with Rosario for $8m. PS. Eddie Rosario has all of one 30/100 season in his career so yeah, okay.

$8m is more than I expected, good for Eddie. While I hold zero love for Cleveland, I hope he does well and continues to get paid.

Seventh in all of MLB? Wow, that's entirely unexpected.

Rosario has nearly 3000 MLB plate appearances, I don't believe we need more time to draw the conclusion that he's an adequate MLB starter but nothing more than that. He's also nearing or at the decline phase while the Twins have several very good corner outfielders in the high minors, any of which could outperform Rosario as soon as this season. The Twins also paid him $14m to play for them, why are they obligated to continue doing so? I've seen plenty of teams do a player wrong but waiving a guy instead of going to arbitration isn't one of them. They even placed Eddie on outright waivers so any team could claim him at his arbitration price tag. And your second example is Lance Lynn... what did the Twins do to him? They gave him money when other teams wouldn't, that's what they did. The fact Lynn was mad because no other team offered him more money is not the Twins' fault, and certainly not an indicator of fault. Berrios has no legit complaint as far as I'm aware. He's the one who routinely talks down a possible extension, which is his right. He has faith in himself and good for him, I hope it works out. Buxton is the sole example that has any legitimacy and I hope the Twins find a way to repair that relationship, if it's still bad, which I don't know because I haven't heard anything about it in well over a year.

Heh, yeah, Everett was terrible with the bat during his best seasons, too.

Simmons is a *much* better hitter. Everett had a career OPS+ of 66, Simmons is 91.

Rosario isn’t that good, either. There’s a reason every team passed on him and he remains unsigned today.

I have some of the same concerns but also have enough faith in this front office that they’re not throwing darts blindfolded. The Twins are definitely better at this kind of thing than the Angels and Simmons is absolutely better in the field than Polanco. With the right positioning and strategy, Simmons should improve, or at least hold steady over a single season. But he’s definitely at the decline age for a middle infielder, though I have no real idea to what extent. His 2019 was injury-riddled and 2020 was only 60 games. We haven’t gotten sufficient data for Simmons since 2018, which makes spreadsheet analysis kinda worthless.

I think both Polanco and Arraez roam. Polanco back to short on occasion, Arraez more all over the field in the Marwin role.

Agreed. I see people - not here but elsewhere - acting like Simmons is Drew Butera. He’s been close to league average with the bat, which makes him pretty okay as an offensive shortstop.

Maybe you misread what I typed... the team is better now and probably not by an IGsignificant amount. Basically, it’s probable the team just improved significantly, I just worded it in reverse.

Nice.

A perfectly adequate signing. Not my first or even second choice but a fine signing. The team is better now than It was six hours ago and probably not by an insignificant amount.

There are certainly questions whether Maeda can keep it up and in what capacity but Dodgers fans saw a very different version of Maeda than we saw last season. Their opinions aren't really relevant to the 2020 version of the pitcher. For example, his K% went up a whopping 5% while going from the NL to AL, where he faced a DH instead of a pitcher 11% of the time. His peripherals improved across the board, which isn't an accident. His K% was such an improvement that it launched him all the way to eighth out of all qualifying pitchers in baseball. I expect to see some kind of regression Maeda but have no idea the extent of that regression. The numbers back up him being a much better pitcher going forward, I just don't expect him to maintain "second in Cy voting" good.

The 2020 version of Maeda fits into 30 MLB rotations. The Twins changed his approach and he took a huge step forward last season. The question is whether that is sustainable and in what capacity but had the Dodgers controlled a version of Maeda that good, there's a zero percent chance they deal him for as little as they did. The guy finished second in Cy Young voting, for crying out loud. Let's not downplay how good he was or suggest 29 other teams wouldn't love to have him.

The Twins will need, at minimum, seven starters this season, probably more like 8-9 over 140+ games or whatever they end up playing. Relying on the minors for slots #4-9 is a good way to ensure a losing season. The kids will get their shots either way but it’s bad planning to rely heavily on them from day one.

As a second move, this is fine. Happ is decent enough. If this is their starting pitching move, ick.