Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Twins Front Office Finding a Sweet Spot with Low-Wattage Free-Agent Bats


    Jamie Cameron

    The Twins have relied on low-wattage offensive additions in recent seasons. Is playing the waiting game and plucking the diamond from the rough a skill for this front office—or is their success with that model a mirage?

    Image courtesy of © Chris Tilley-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    The last few Twins offseason have hardly been flush with excitement. In fact, they've been downright slow. External additions have been few and underwhelming. Twins fans have an increasingly rancorous relationship with an ownership group who want to sell the club, anyway. Curtailed spending has necessitated creativity from the front office in rounding out the roster. While there will always be a focus on roster additions that didn’t work out, the Twins have quietly established a solid track record in a contextually important aspect of roster building; low-cost veteran bats.

    The Twins are a pitching organization. As the pitching development and performance goes, so go the fortunes of the major-league team. Recent spending constraints necessitated that the Twins hit on some of their offensive additions, most of whom have been acquired at minimal expense. They have! With the Twins projected to have a high-variance lineup in 2025, let’s look at some recent under-the-radar additions who outperformed expectations and provided a strong return on investment, and examine the 2025 candidate to fill this role on the roster.

    2023: Michael A Taylor, OF
    In 2023, the low-wattage addition was Michael A. Taylor, acquired from the Royals in exchange for Evan Sisk and Steven Cruz. Taylor was brought in as a legitimate backup and insurance policy for Byron Buxton. The Twins paid Taylor $4.5 million in 2023, for 2.0 fWAR in 129 games. While the bat was around average (95 wRC+), that came with a career-high 21 home runs, at least putting a dent in the void left by the oft-injured Buxton. Defensively, Taylor was worth 9 Outs Above Average, good for 14th among outfielders that year—and an improvement on the 5 OAA he accrued for the Royals in 2022.

    2024: Carlos Santana, 1B
    Santana is easily the most famous of this group, and has had (easily) the best career. He’ll go into his age-39 season with Cleveland in 2025, for what will be his 15th major-league season. The Twins signed Santana to a one-year, $5.25-million deal for 2024, and it couldn’t have worked out better. Santana accrued 3.0 fWAR in 2024, his most since 2019 with Cleveland (4.8 fWAR) and his third-highest single-season total ever. In 2024, Santana outgained his fWAR from his previous four seasons combined, logging 150 games and a 114 wRC+ in the process.

    Additionally, he won his first Gold Glove. While that award is hardly a reliable indicator of defensive excellence, consider this: Santana was worth 2 OAA in 2023 (146 games), good for 11th among qualified first basemen. In 2024, he was worth 14 OAA, tops in baseball among first basemen, ahead of Christian Walker.

    2025: Ty France, 1B
    This brings us to this season’s version of this move, Ty France. This feels like the final boss. France was the cheapest of these moves, at just $1 million. Unlike Taylor and Santana, there’s no established track record of defensive excellence.

    France ranked 40th (out of 40) in OAA in 2024, at -12. Not great, but we know he was playing through a significant heel injury. How about 2023? 16th at -1 OAA; much better. There’s no hiding from the fact that France was bad offensively in 2024. He managed a .670 OPS, good for just a 93 wRC+. We are talking about a hitter who has a track record of significant MLB success. In his previous four seasons, France averaged a 123 wRC+. Is that a reasonable expectation for 2025? I don’t think so. If the Twins got an average bat and an average glove, it would represent a significant win, given the roster-building constraints this offseason and the timing of the move.

    Not even mentioned, here, is Donovan Solano, who arguably had an impact similar to that of Taylor for the 2023 club. What are the lessons learned here? Is this a beat Derek Falvey has sniffed out exceptionally well? Possibly. I think there’s also credence to the idea that they don’t care to allocate significant resources to first base, at least not given the current context and confines of their payroll. As the pitching goes, so will the Twins go in 2025, but maybe they’ll continue to bubble up some value from unexpected sources.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    8 minutes ago, Cris E said:

    You've got it backwards. These guys are not leading away from good young players and towards more filler, They're only there until our own good young kids show up, which is what's been pointed out is already happening in the rotation.

    The goal is always to be developing your own guys to fill holes long-term, but while you're waiting for them, signing a series of mediocre veterans is not a bad plan.  What an actual bad plan looks like is signing someone mediocre or old to a long-term deal. Settling for three or four years of a Rhys Hoskins, Gio Urshela or even Ty France slams the door shut in the face of the eventual emergence of Miranda or Julien or Larnach or Keaschall or Gasper or Eeles or whoever. Gallo was around until there were better options. Margot is gone. Farmer was pushed out by the youngster Lee.   This is what it should look like. (And since no one is perfect, there's always room for some improvement. In our case it is mostly around when to cut bait on a failed spin of the wheel.)

     

    To develop players you have to play them. If you are waiting for our players to arrive at a certain level & don't play them, they never arrive & this vicious recycling of veteran FA rejects never end.

    23 hours ago, Karbo said:

    How are they going to develop a 1st baseman if they keep getting these types on 1 year deal? It sure would be nice to have a youngster to put there and let him grow. I've been advocating to move Lewis to 1st for a couple of years now. With Keaschall on the verge of his major league debut, they move Lee to 3rd and Keaschall to 2nd. Now that has the potential to be a really good defense, with guys that can hit!

    Show me the guy hitting so well he needs to shoulder his way past everyone else to claim ABs. Kirilloff might have been one, but his body failed and he's out of the picture.   Did you not see who was playing 1B in St Paul last year? Severino? Williams? Isola? Does anyone else have a better 3B glove that makes you need to move Lewis? If Miranda's hitting starts demanding a spot in the lineup his glove is making the case for 1b, not 3b.  Keaschall hasn't fielded in a year and needs to go down to the minors to solidify his hitting. Remember he's only got 267 AB in AA (where he only slugged .439) and nothing higher so far. Julien and Martin are both slow to come into focus, but either could at any time and neither is a great fielder that would belong anywhere but 1B. 

    I get your point, but you need to have these good young guys before you move away from one year veteran filler guys, and we simply haven't had those kids step up yet. Maybe by the end of this year, certainly some for next year, but not yet. Not even close.

    6 minutes ago, Doctor Gast said:

    To develop players you have to play them. If you are waiting for our players to arrive at a certain level & don't play them, they never arrive & this vicious recycling of veteran FA rejects never end.

    Seriously who? Actual names.  See my note above, but they didn't have anyone ready last year. They don't have anyone ready now, If you'd thrown the keys to Julien last year it would have failed. Kirilloff would still have been injured. If you move Jeffers you need to play Camargo and that's a terrible trade.  Who?  

    This isn't hypothetical team building, they only have this list of names to work with. Who?

    18 minutes ago, Cris E said:

    Seriously who? Actual names.  See my note above, but they didn't have anyone ready last year. They don't have anyone ready now, If you'd thrown the keys to Julien last year it would have failed. Kirilloff would still have been injured. If you move Jeffers you need to play Camargo and that's a terrible trade.  Who?  

    This isn't hypothetical team building, they only have this list of names to work with. Who?

    I'm just responding to your hypothetical statement. Last year we had Miranda, Kiriloff & should have sent Julien down to AAA to learn 1B & how to adjust his hitting. Miranda & Kiriloff were mashing coming off shoulder injuries. If they kept them both at 1B/DH they would have both stayed healthy for most if not the whole season & mashed. & we had 1Bman Severino in AAA as a break glass. 

    Because Kiriloff retired & Julien was kept down in AAA to learn 1B, I'm not against signing France as a fulltime DH & partime backup to Miranda but not handed primary 1B on a platter.

    My whole point is that I agree with your hypothetical but they don't have the players for that and have to make do in the 1.0 WAR bin until the kids step up.  The complaints I was addressing were very concrete lists of names and the answer to them is equally concrete.

    21 minutes ago, Cris E said:

    Seriously who? Actual names.  

    I think DaShawn Keirsey over Marlot (-0.2 fWAR, 79 WRC+) would have been preferred. At least we would know if Keirsey is an MLB 4th outfielder who can play an acceptable backup CF. Not knowing this has led to Bader with Keirsey still on the 40 man roster. 
     

    Agree that they had no internal options at 1B. 

    40 minutes ago, Cris E said:

    Show me the guy hitting so well he needs to shoulder his way past everyone else to claim ABs. Kirilloff might have been one, but his body failed and he's out of the picture.   Did you not see who was playing 1B in St Paul last year? Severino? Williams? Isola? Does anyone else have a better 3B glove that makes you need to move Lewis? If Miranda's hitting starts demanding a spot in the lineup his glove is making the case for 1b, not 3b.  Keaschall hasn't fielded in a year and needs to go down to the minors to solidify his hitting. Remember he's only got 267 AB in AA (where he only slugged .439) and nothing higher so far. Julien and Martin are both slow to come into focus, but either could at any time and neither is a great fielder that would belong anywhere but 1B. 

    I get your point, but you need to have these good young guys before you move away from one year veteran filler guys, and we simply haven't had those kids step up yet. Maybe by the end of this year, certainly some for next year, but not yet. Not even close.

    Move Lewis to 1st, Lee to 3rd. Keaschall did play on defense last year and will again this year. I anticipate him up by mid season, and 2nd is the most likely position for him.

    1 minute ago, Karbo said:

    Move Lewis to 1st, Lee to 3rd. Keaschall did play on defense last year and will again this year. I anticipate him up by mid season, and 2nd is the most likely position for him.

    You are correct, he did play elsewhere. (Fangraphs doesn't sort their fielding numbers by year, which was pretty unexpected.) He may well be up in three months, but not until then. And he's still only got 267 PA above A+ ball and they were not outstanding.  He's essentially Brooks Lee from a couple years ago and we've already got one looking for a spot.

    20 minutes ago, Eris said:

    I think DaShawn Keirsey over Marlot (-0.2 fWAR, 79 WRC+) would have been preferred. At least we would know if Keirsey is an MLB 4th outfielder who can play an acceptable backup CF. Not knowing this has led to Bader with Keirsey still on the 40 man roster. 
     

    Agree that they had no internal options at 1B. 

    I think the Twins are still living in the shadow of 2022 where they had a huge number of injuries, didn't provide a sufficient number of backups and didn't have any real players left by August. Some of those late-season outfields would have embaressed St Paul.   So finding a guy that was a proven CF to cover for Buxton's  inevitable 100 game outage was important. Remember that Rocco described Kiersey's D as greatly improved after a lot of work, meaning that it wasn't always this good. And a year ago he had not had any MLB experience yet so they didn't want to find out his hitting game did not translate while knowing that they needed a half season of CF work from that roster spot.

    I can see the decision going either way for most teams, but after 2022 the Twins are always going to have a proven MLB baseline on the roster at every position. Doubly so for spots with proven injury risk like Buxton, Correa and pitching in general.

     

    On 3/14/2025 at 5:27 PM, Rod Carews Birthday said:

    This makes perfect sense, but honestly my first takeaway is “Holy Crap!  The White Sox were BELOW replacement level last year WITH Garret Crochet!”

    And wasn’t it fun? 

    On 3/14/2025 at 5:36 PM, Major League Ready said:

    This is a very good point.  We don't see Cleveland signing nearly as many of this type of player.  I do think we are improving in this regard because THANKFULLY we no longer need to sign warm bodies for the back of the rotation.  With reasonable health we should be able to avoid these types of pitchers for the next several years.

    I also do see the need for low-rent OFers for quite some time either with Rodriguez / Jenkins on the horizon and Keaschall probably will play some OF as well.  Martin might be kept around as well.

    3B and SS are covered for the foreseeable future as well.  That leaves us with 2B and 1B which are the easiest two positions to fill.  IDK who ends up there but it seems likely they fill 2B with either Lee, Julien or maybe even Gasper until Keaschall is here.  That leaves Miranda or maybe Julien for 1B.  I also think we will trade one of Wallner or Larnach next off-season or when Jenkins is ready.  This assumes Rodriquez works out at least reasonably well.  That trade could be used to fill a need.  Tampa and Cleveland have been great at getting major league ready guys in this type of trade.

    I went through this exercise to ask this question ... Are we at the point where the type of player you pointed out won't be needed starting next year?  I think the vast majority of us would like to see the system produce enough that we can move on from these low-rent players.  Some of them have been good as you point out but it sure would be nice to simply not need them.

    I don’t about not needing any, because stuff happens, but the fact that we are down to signing only France and Bader suggests they are needing low-rent guys less and less. I think you could do a similar exercise on the pitching side and see that the lonely low-rent guys this year are Coulombe and Tonkin.  




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...