Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Will Lower-Than-Anticipated Attendance and Payroll Limitations Impact Twins Trade Deadline?


    Cody Christie

    As the trade deadline approaches, the Twins front office is in a difficult situation. Attendance is down at Target Field, and ownership has limited payroll entering the season. So, how will the club make meaningful moves?

    Image courtesy of Melissa Berman, Twins Daily

    Twins Video

    The 2024 MLB trade deadline is just over two weeks away, and front offices will be fielding calls on players throughout the organization. The Twins enter the All-Star break with more than an 80% chance of making the playoffs, and are still within striking distance of Cleveland for the AL Central title. If the front office wants to add players, there are multiple factors to consider, including current and future payroll limitations. So, how will the trade deadline be impacted by Target Field attendance and the Pohlad family’s decision to reduce payroll?

    Payroll Limitations in 2024 and Beyond
    The Twins’ front office has shown a tendency to target players with more than one year of team control. Unfortunately, Joe Pohlad and the ownership group decided to cut payroll by $30 million this offseason. This cut prevented the team from making significant offseason acquisitions, and even forced the club to trade long-time infielder Jorge Polanco to make payroll space. Minnesota has found ways to continue to win in 2024 despite the payroll drop, but the future is even murkier.

    Next season, the Twins see some of their best players get a bump in pay. Pablo López is making $8.25 million this season, but is scheduled to receive a raise to $21.75 million in 2025. Carlos Correa gets a slight pay hike, an increase of $4 million, because of how his contract's total value was divided among its six seasons. There will also be multiple arbitration-eligible players who see a significant salary jump, including regulars like Willi Castro and Ryan Jeffers. Minnesota’s front office must consider these projected salary increases when trading for players. 

    Less Clarity on the TV Situation
    For 2024, the Twins re-signed with Diamond Sports Group, the parent company for Bally Sports North. In 2023, Dave St. Peter said that the Twins made around $60 million in their television deal. Minnesota won’t announce how much the team is making in the current deal, but it is believed to be between $35-45 million. Even with this influx, the team failed to make any additional moves this winter to add payroll.

    St. Peter is hopeful that games will be back on TV “soon,” with Comcast and Diamond Sports feuding since May 1.

    "Yeah, there's all kinds of urgency. Certainly, the baseball team, which we're not a part of that negotiation, are urging all sides to come together and to get a deal done," St. Peter explains. "I do know there's some ongoing conversations, and I think that's good. I'm hopeful that you're gonna see Twins baseball back on Comcast soon."

    Lower-Than-Anticipated Attendance
    During the winter, the Twins talked openly about expecting an increase in attendance for the 2024 season. Minnesota had seen a rise in attendance over the last two seasons, from 1.8 million in 2022 to 1.97 million last season. St. Peter talked at TwinsFest about anticipating home attendance exceeding 2 million for the first time since 2019. The team was coming off a division title and their first playoff series victory in two decades, so would only make sense for fan morale to be high.

    Unfortunately, the team’s projections didn’t consider other factors, like the slashed payroll and television issues. Attendance is down by nearly 1,200 fans per game, compared to the same per-game figures through this point last season. They're averaging fewer than 22,000 fans per game so far, which makes it nearly impossible for the Twins to draw over 2 million fans on the season. They're 23rd in overall attendance and 21st in year-over-year attendance change. Lower television viewership leads to lower attendance by reducing fan engagement and enthusiasm, which will have payroll implications beyond the current season.

    Minnesota is on pace to win more than 90 games and qualify for the playoffs for the second straight season, but ownership’s choices are starting to have long-term effects. 

    Trade Deadline Outlook
    Derek Falvey and Thad Levine have shown the ability to be aggressive at the trade deadline when they believe there are clear roster needs. The Twins have needs this season, but the front office is in a tough payroll spot for 2024 and beyond. Minnesota stood pat at last year’s deadline, and they will likely do something similar this year, because of everything outlined above. 


    How will these issues impact the trade deadline? Will attendance improve at Target Field in the second half? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 hour ago, USAFChief said:

    Going to a Twins game isn't cheap, but it's not $6-700 per, either. 

    There's no reason a fan can't take in a game, with a hot dog and a beer,  including parking, for $75 or less. Family of four for $250 easily. 

    I do it for less.

    And there is a dollar dog night, family concession stands with reasonable prices. Bring in your own water. Etc etc. 

     

    It probably is for me, but I specifically said it's a different equation for everyone.  I chose to enjoy the game at a certain level, but I do it less at the higher spend.  When the same experience is twice the cost, everyone cuts back. 

    And a $250 excursion for a family of 4 is a lot.  

    Like special treat a lot. Once a year, on your birthday, a lot. 

    It a huge factor.

    Low attendance is just the latest thing. Dr Pepper over taking Pepsi s as the #2 brand in the country. The price of snacks going down. 
     

    The Pohlads are losing money hand over fist in all their investments. It’s clearly why they pocketed the cash from the renewed Ballys contract. Gotta prop up that personal wealth.

    12 hours ago, TopGunn#22 said:

    The team to beat is Baltimore, and the only chance the Twins have is to get healthy and find a SP who has similar talent to Lopez and Ryan. 

    I cannot disagree with anything in your comment. The thing I wonder is who is available and what is the cost? Along with cost .... can the Twins afford to pay in prospects/players what is needed to reel in a decent starting pitcher?

    10 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    They screwed up and they're paying for it now.

    This is what happened, plain and simple.

    Now there has been a long silence since last offseason and perhaps the players can perform at a high enough level to bring back an increase in attendance and an interest in the club.

    As far as to whether Minnesota is a baseball state .... look at percentage of attendance of capacity for your answer or attend high school or college football, basketball, and baseball games. I don't follow the Vikings (since Joe Capp) and couldn't name their top five players without looking it up much less the defensive guys. How many people on this site would choose baseball if it meant they could never follow football, hockey, or basketball? It isn't really important or a big deal but St. Louis or Los Angeles are baseball towns and Minnesotans just have other priorities. While I (and others) will always follow baseball, it is not the first choice in this area. Such is life.

    I still believe that we are correcting from Vazquez, Gallo and Correa. Vazquez and Gallo signed almost immediately after Correa signed with the Giants. I believe they spent the earmarked Correa money on Vazquez and Gallo only to have Correa become available again. Just a Post Hoc theory from me but it sure seems to add up.

    This front office has been typically aggressive as either a buyer or seller in past trade deadlines. 

    Last year at the deadline it was crickets despite having perhaps the best pitching staff we have seen in a long long time. 

    Last off-season... despite winning a series and building on that momentum. A payroll cut was announced. 

    These things smell budgety. 

    Attendance down, television viewership down significantly. 

    I still have that budget odor in my nostrils. 

    I'm not expecting big additions at the deadline. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...