Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Matt Wallner Dilemma: Real Progress or More of the Same?

    Matt Wallner has elite raw power. The question is whether he'll ever tap into it properly. After another season of streaks, strikeouts, and subtle progress beneath the surface, 2026 feels like a year that could finally give us answers.

    Sam Caulder
    Image courtesy of © Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

     

    Matt Wallner is entering his fifth season on the big-league roster. At this point, we kind of know what he is—and we kind of don’t.

    He’s spent time in left field and at DH, but the overwhelming majority of his innings have come in right field for the Twins. That’s not by accident. He has an absolute cannon for an arm. According to Statcast, his arm strength ranked in the 99th percentile of all outfielders in 2025. It was 99th percentile in 2024 and 100th percentile in 2023. That gives him real defensive upside, despite the struggles he's had in properly positioning himself and getting to balls fast enough to let the arm play as well as it should.

    Offensively, it’s been even more of a rollercoaster. In 2025, Wallner hit just .202. That’s the number that jumps off the page, and not in a good way. His on-base percentage was .311, which is respectable for someone barely clearing the Mendoza Line, but when your batting average starts with a “.20,” there’s only so much spin you can put on it. 

    The expected stats don’t bail him out. His expected batting average sat at .205, right in line with the results. This wasn’t a case of screaming line drives right at defenders or terrible luck. He simply didn’t make enough consistent, high-quality contact to deserve much better. It's not exactly a mystery why he struggled; we diagnosed his problems last summer.

    It’s also not the first time we’ve seen this. In 2024, Wallner broke camp with the team, but hit just .213 with 27 strikeouts in 59 plate appearances before being sent down to Triple-A. That’s understandable if you’re 22, but when you’re 26 (with multiple seasons of big-league time), those stretches feel more significant.

    To his credit, he responded. After getting called back up in 2024, he hit .272 with 25 extra-base hits over his final 55 games. The swing decisions improved, and the power played better, without him completely selling out for it. That stretch created real optimism heading into 2025.

    Unfortunately, it didn’t carry over consistently.

    League-wide offense isn’t what it used to be. A .275 hitter today is basically what a .300 hitter was 30 years ago. Pitchers are better, velocity is up, and bullpens are deeper. Context matters. Still, it's rare to see someone hit around .200 and be a truly impactful everyday player. Yes, there are exceptions. Kyle Schwarber has done it with the Philadelphia Phillies, but he’s also launching 45-plus home runs and posting elite on-base numbers. That’s a different tier of production. Arguably, that's the right road map for Wallner, but for all his bat speed and strength, he hasn't shown the same caliber of in-game power Schwarber has.

    Wallner’s 2025 pace over 162 games would’ve put him around 34 home runs, which isn’t bad. But if your profile is built around power, 34 feels more “solid” than “game-changing.” That’s roughly one home run every five games. Fellow age-27 Minnesota native Michael Busch hit 34 homers for the Cubs, but he also had a much lower strikeout rate and showed the ability to hit line drives to all fields. If you’re making your living off the long ball the way Wallner does, you’d hope for quite a bit more.

    image.png

    Here’s where it gets interesting.

    There were real signs of progress under the hood in 2025. His strikeout rate dropped to 29%. That’s still not good, but it’s a significant improvement from the 36.4% mark in 2024. Yes, he made more bad contact, thanks to his flatter bat path, and yes, some of the strikeout decrease had to do with being more aggressive early in counts, but for a player with this much pop, being aggressive is ok.

    The raw power remains very real. His barrel rate stayed comfortably better than average, and his average exit velocity hovered north of 90 mph. Both numbers were lower than in 2024, but that's the cost of making more contact. When he squares it up, it goes a long way. The question is whether he can do so more consistently this season.

    Health hasn’t helped. Wallner got off to a slow start in 2025, then dealt with a midseason injury that stalled any momentum he was building. For a hitter who thrives on rhythm and timing, that matters. It’s hard to make adjustments when you’re constantly resetting.

    I want to believe in Matt Wallner. I want to tell you he’s about to put it together and become a 35-homer, .250 hitter with a .350 OBP and a rocket launcher in right field. But I can’t say that with full confidence. Too many signals are garbled, or pointing in the wrong direction.

    If he can push the batting average back into the .250 range, which he’s flashed before, his profile changes dramatically. A .250 hitter with a 12% walk rate and 30-plus homer power plays. Add elite arm strength (and maybe some better routes, with more experience and instruction) in right field, and now you’re talking about a very valuable player. Maybe the more likely outcome is something frustratingly but usefully in-between. PECOTA projects Wallner to hit .222/.326/.427 in 489 plate appearances this year: not fully available, not fully breaking out, but not struggling the way he did last year, either.

    There’s a lot of volatility with Wallner. His floor is a streaky power bat who doesn’t make enough contact. But the ceiling is a true impact corner outfielder who changes games on both sides of the ball. That’s why 2026 feels pivotal. If he has another season like last year, it'll be hard to muster much enthusiasm next spring. Indeed, it might be some other fan base doing the mustering by then.

     

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    2 hours ago, Twins_Fan_in_NJ said:

    The Mets and Red Sox might have the two worst RF situations in baseball, so again, I'm not finding that to be a glowing endorsement of Wallner.

    The Mets decided to roll with their #2 prospect Carson Benge. I'd hardly call it a bad situation. Their backup plan is less than ideal, with ideas of placing Baty out there if needed, and the other backup plan seeing if other top 100 prospect Ryan Clifford can force his way into the conversation. 

    Matt Wallner wouldn't necessarily be unwelcome on the roster, since he has an option he could be sent down to AAA if things got crowded, but the Mets are dealing with their own Wallner-esque player in Mark Vientos (who sadly has no options remaining). 

    1 hour ago, NYCTK said:

    The thing is, $200 million is not a ridiculous payroll. In a few years, that will be the median payroll and the Twins, when trying to be competitive should be sitting around that median. And occasionally, when wanting to actually contend for a title, going up to the 10th highest payroll. 

    In an alternate reality, where the Twins made good decisions after the 2023 season, they are sitting with about a $230 million this season. Maybe that means Sonny Gray is here with Pete Alonso, Duran, Jax, and Carlos Correa are still around, and maybe someone like Harrison Bader still around. I still don't know if that is a very good team, but it's probably good enough to win the AL Central. 

    Anyways, my point is, fans need to EXPECT a $200 Million payroll, not fear it. Not in a year like this, when there's no effort to compete, instead resetting the roster and seeing what sticks, but on a typical year in which they hope to win the AL Central. 

    There are many that agree with you on payroll. I won't argue it... I honestly have no idea what is happening in the accounting department.   

    Myself personally. I'm done fighting, asking or expecting it. History has taught me well that free agency is not a viable staffing option for us.... UNLESS... they get better at developing young talent that costs less in order to free up the money where we can surprise the pants of me by signing a Correa (who didn't exactly work out). Or... extending a player we'd like to keep around past free agency eligibility.

    This development hasn't been happening and it is the central core of my almost all of my issues with the Minnesota Twins... it is the underlying source of nearly all of my complaints on this website.

    I get it... some of us (not me) may have concerns with Wallner as expressed in this thread. I read the concerns on Lewis... On Lee. Keaschall had a nice 180 some AB's... just like Julien did... how will the next 500 AB's go... I don't know but we need to find out. 

    I get the concerns but I'll put it rather simply. We either develop these guys into major league capable ball players or we spend 30 to 50 million on 4 or 8 guys on 1 year contracts. If we spend 30 to 50  million on 4 or 8 guys on one year contracts. We won't have the money to spend on a decent free agent that costs a little bit more.

    If we have failed to develop... We have also failed to develop trade value to restock the failed system. It all collapses.

    We can complain about these young players... focus on their faults but they are critical to our future success. IF they fail... we are dead in the water. So... I'm not giving up on them and I'll be cheering my rear end off for them.

    Wallner is critical to what we need to do to survive.   

     

    5 hours ago, stringer bell said:

    Much has been written here and in other threads about his defense. I just checked BBRef again and in '23 and '24 he was essentially neutral as a defender, actually slightly above. I don't know what happened in 2025, but the numbers were much worse. I also know that his sprint speed went from slightly above average to bottom third in MLB. Wallner turned 28 in the off-season so he's not slowing because of age. Could it be injury?

    It seems likely.  Pulled his hamstring severely in April and was on the IL for the next six weeks.  Hamstring injuries can be notoriously slow to fully heal for some athletes.

    His loss of speed may be permanent, or perhaps a winter off will result in slightly better sprint speed this year.  We can only hope, because a faster Wallner would be somewhat less of a liability in the field.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...