Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Case for the Moose: Matt Wallner Deserves More Respect

    Matt Wallner has had a down season in 2025, like many Twins hitters. He should still be getting more respect than he does.

    Cody Pirkl
    Image courtesy of © Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    Editor's Note: This is the second piece in a three-part series to close out this week, examining the Twins' corner outfield situation looking toward 2026 with a particular emphasis on the slugging Wallner. In this installment, Cody Pirkl makes a case for Wallner to be treated more as an indispensable piece of the team's core.

    Doubt has followed Matt Wallner since his debut in 2022. During that season, his swing-and-miss rates in St. Paul made him a questionable candidate to carry his dominance over to the major leagues. Both the fan base and the Twins themselves have maintained a fair amount of skepticism all these years. While Wallner is far from a perfect player, he deserves much more credit than he’s given.

    Wallner’s path has been winding to this point, with periods of complete helplessness at the plate that have resulted in demotions when the swing-and-miss has gotten out of control. It’s a profile Twins fans are sick of watching, after several seasons slipped away as the lineup swung for the fences and missed. 

    Even the Twins have shied away from this player profile, after targeting it so heavily in years past. Although we have yet to see a significant payoff, the organization has increasingly emphasized athleticism and speed (at least rhetorically), and the team's strikeout rate has declined year over year as they’ve targeted fewer “all-or-nothing” hitters. Wallner is the only player with this approach left on the roster.

    The years of doubt in Wallner’s abilities appear to have peaked in 2025, as the team (and the lineup, in particular) has crossed into complete disaster territory. Wallner’s down year has been at least part of the problem with the Twins’ offense, but adding context shows that lumping his struggles this season with the rest of the team is unfair.

    Wallner’s slash line of .215/.323/.507 invokes Twins’ fans' primal urge to point and yell “Miguel Sanó!” It’s hard to argue that Wallner’s 2025 season doesn’t bear a resemblance. In Wallner’s worst season, however, hiss slash line is still over 25% better than that of an average hitter. In comparison to the rest of the Twins’ lineup, it becomes even more ridiculous to complain about.

    Wallner’s .830 OPS trails only Byron Buxton among starters on the team, as does his tally of 20 home runs. His unsightly batting average is a result of a batting average on balls in play that is below average for the first time in his professional career. We now know that BABIP is not purely a luck-based metric (see Max Kepler), and that Wallner’s consistently elite exit velocities should lead to a bounceback in this department, with all things being equal. Meanwhile, he’s still walked over 10% of the time this season and has a sub-30% strikeout rate for the first time in his MLB career. This year looks like the low end of the spectrum of outcomes you can expect to see from a player with this profile, and Wallner is still one of the Twins’ better hitters.

    image.jpeg.a989614907ec6c044d439461315c9233.jpeg

    Fans being frustrated with this profile is to be expected, but the Twins themselves appear to have shifted their view on Wallner. More often, he has hit at the bottom of the lineup, with players who are having genuinely poor offensive seasons, such as Royce Lewis and Edouard Julien. This move down the lineup has made Wallner’s strengths much less impactful, as many of his homers have come with the bases empty, and he often has nobody to hit him in when he takes his walks.

    Meanwhile, Trevor Larnach has consistently batted as high as second in the order, despite a below-average offensive season, and Kody Clemens has continued to slot into the heart of the order despite his production being in the tank for months now. The Twins are clearly signaling a lack of faith in Wallner, and it could make things interesting heading into 2026 as they look to shake up this disappointing core.


    For more on the contrast between Larnach and Wallner, specifically, see the first article in this series, from Eric Blonigen.


    Since the season Wallner was promoted, the Twins have had their doubts about him. In 2022, they kept him in St. Paul for far too long as Jake Cave and Mark Contreras roamed the outfield deep into a lost season. There were rumors of them considering trading him away as recently as the 2024 trade deadline. All he’s done is post an .853 OPS in almost 900 plate appearances in his career. 

    It’s an odd dynamic, as you’d think an organization that has done such a poor job of drafting and developing offensive players would be quick to celebrate Wallner, who is arguably the best offensive player they’ve drafted in this regime’s history. He has his flaws, but for him to seemingly be grouped with some of the lineup's worst performers down the stretch seems a bit extreme.

    Wallner has had a down season in 2025, but it’s easy to see that his standards are much different than the rest of the lineup. Not only are fans down on his performance, but it appears the Twins are, as well. The numbers speak for themselves, however.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Wallner is not slow. He's actually one if the fastest players on the team in regard to sprint speed. But he's a very large person and it takes time to get up and moving. Therefore, he's fast, but isn't necessarily "quick". That means he's never going to steal a ton of bases, and must get solid reads in the OF to be effective.

    THE BAD:

    He's never going to be quick.

    He's never going to be a great defender. But he's previously been better than this season. He may be taking some of his frustration to the field with him.

    He's always going to K more than people want.

    THE GOOD:

    His arm is in the 90+% in MLB for strength/speed and accuracy. Teams don't even try to run on him any longer.

    His power is tremendous.

    His QUAD SLASH for his CAREER....meaning briefly in 2022, and including THIS down season, PLUS 2023'-'24...sits at:

    .238/ .350/ .501/ .823

    Those are excellent numbers! That's an approximately leage average HIT tool, and ABOVE league average OB%, SLG %, and OPS%. His OPS PLUS is 133! That means as a hitter he's 33% BETTER than average.

    He can't control where he gets put in the lineup or how many runners from a poor producing lineup are on base in front of him.

    But by all means, if you haven't learned that there is more to measuring ballplayers besides their BATTING AVERAGES, then I suppose Wallner will look bad to you. But considering the LEAGUE WIDE AVERAGE batting average is below .250, I guess baseball is just filled with really bad players everywhere.

    Ideally, Rodriguez and Jenkins will both be fine ML players and take over the corner spots, and soon. That's not only good for the lineup, but it does put better defense on the field. It would allow Wallner the ability to DH more often, and be a backup corner OF.

    But any notion Wallner has been a bad player, and that he hasn't still been one of the better bats on the Twins this season, or that he isn't/can't be very important at his 2023-24 levels going forward is just not accurate. 

     

    2 hours ago, Bodie said:

    Give every GM a choice- Wallner or Stanton. I'll even give you that they must be paid as per their current contract. 

    One man may choose Wallner.  Maybe. Even with the disparity in pay.  Even with Stanton being a broken down shell of his former self.

    Unfortunately that man is named Derrick Falvey. 

    That's exactly the point I am making...Optics are key.  We don't watch Stanton every day, but the way ALL fans view their players is "the grass is always greener on the other side"...

    Sources: https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/giancarlo-stanton-519317?stats=statcast-r-hitting-mlb

    https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/matt-wallner-670242?stats=statcast-r-hitting-mlb

    Stanton's Batting Run Value (avg/OBP/OPS):                            Wallner's Batting Run Value (avg/OBP/OPS):

    2023: 1 (43rd percentile in MLB) .191/.275/.695                         2023: 12 (72nd percentile in MLB) .249/.370/.877  

    2024: 9 (70th percentile in MLB) .233/.298/.773                       2024: 13 (76th percentile in MLB) .259/.372/.895

    2025: 17 (84th percentile in MLB) .305/.380/1.027                   2025: 17 (84th percentile in MLB) .215/.321/.823

    Career 16 seasons: .259/.346/.875                                              Career 4 seasons: .238/.350/.851

    2025 is an up year for Stanton and a down year for Wallner, but they are still producing at the same level of Batting run value.  Even their career values are similar.  They even strike out at similar rates (2025 K rates: 30.5% for Stanton and 29.3% for Wallner).  The only difference is Stanton has been producing for longer.  I am not saying Wallner and Stanton should be viewed equally, but stats don't lie.  They produce similar results...

    5 hours ago, Chembry said:

    Is Giancarlo Stanton a good hitter?  Just curious what your thoughts are on him?  They have very similar stat lines this year.

    Since 2023, Wallner has provided a better run value that Giancarlo Stanton...Most probably put Stanton in much higher regard than Wallner, but that just isn't the case.

    They are similar at the plate and in the field….  if Im being honest Wallner is probably a slightly better defender and baserunner. I would take Wallner at this point in their careers.

    1 hour ago, Chembry said:

    That's exactly the point I am making...Optics are key.  We don't watch Stanton every day, but the way ALL fans view their players is "the grass is always greener on the other side"...

    Sources: https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/giancarlo-stanton-519317?stats=statcast-r-hitting-mlb

    https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/matt-wallner-670242?stats=statcast-r-hitting-mlb

    Stanton's Batting Run Value (avg/OBP/OPS):                            Wallner's Batting Run Value (avg/OBP/OPS):

    2023: 1 (43rd percentile in MLB) .191/.275/.695                         2023: 12 (72nd percentile in MLB) .249/.370/.877  

    2024: 9 (70th percentile in MLB) .233/.298/.773                       2024: 13 (76th percentile in MLB) .259/.372/.895

    2025: 17 (84th percentile in MLB) .305/.380/1.027                   2025: 17 (84th percentile in MLB) .215/.321/.823

    Career 16 seasons: .259/.346/.875                                              Career 4 seasons: .238/.350/.851

    2025 is an up year for Stanton and a down year for Wallner, but they are still producing at the same level of Batting run value.  Even their career values are similar.  They even strike out at similar rates (2025 K rates: 30.5% for Stanton and 29.3% for Wallner).  The only difference is Stanton has been producing for longer.  I am not saying Wallner and Stanton should be viewed equally, but stats don't lie.  They produce similar results...

    Another thing that is being pushed aside is Wallner's injury history, in 3 1/2 seasons he has what.... Something like 800 AB's. The power cannot be ignored, but neither can his defense and speed. One of the dumbest moves our brilliant manager decided was a good idea was to have him leading off, that decision should get you fired alone. I think he has value as a DH and an occasional RF appearance. Value increases significantly if he could transition to 1st.... though some think that's a silly idea.

    13 hours ago, Chembry said:

    That's exactly the point I am making...Optics are key.  We don't watch Stanton every day, but the way ALL fans view their players is "the grass is always greener on the other side"...

    Sources: https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/giancarlo-stanton-519317?stats=statcast-r-hitting-mlb

    https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/matt-wallner-670242?stats=statcast-r-hitting-mlb

    Stanton's Batting Run Value (avg/OBP/OPS):                            Wallner's Batting Run Value (avg/OBP/OPS):

    2023: 1 (43rd percentile in MLB) .191/.275/.695                         2023: 12 (72nd percentile in MLB) .249/.370/.877  

    2024: 9 (70th percentile in MLB) .233/.298/.773                       2024: 13 (76th percentile in MLB) .259/.372/.895

    2025: 17 (84th percentile in MLB) .305/.380/1.027                   2025: 17 (84th percentile in MLB) .215/.321/.823

    Career 16 seasons: .259/.346/.875                                              Career 4 seasons: .238/.350/.851

    2025 is an up year for Stanton and a down year for Wallner, but they are still producing at the same level of Batting run value.  Even their career values are similar.  They even strike out at similar rates (2025 K rates: 30.5% for Stanton and 29.3% for Wallner).  The only difference is Stanton has been producing for longer.  I am not saying Wallner and Stanton should be viewed equally, but stats don't lie.  They produce similar results...

    47 RBIs (170 ABs) versus 35 RBIs (279 ABs) says he's 33% more productive in 60% of his at bats.

    Not similar. Not even in the same ballpark.  

    3 hours ago, Bodie said:

    47 RBIs (170 ABs) versus 35 RBIs (279 ABs) says he's 33% more productive in 60% of his at bats.

    Not similar. Not even in the same ballpark.  

    I understand that… as I said wallner is having a down year and Stanton is having an up year, but their batting run value is the same.

    since you brought up RBIs, yes Stanton is out producing in terms of RBIs this year.  No question.  But, 2023 Wallner out produced Stanton in RBIs per AB (0.19 vs 0.16) and 2024 they produced at the same rate (0.17 per AB).  Also basing offensive value based solely on RBIs is unfair.  His production could definitely be better with RISP, but that also necessitates the hitters in front of him getting on base as well.  

    I understand quite a few dislike Wallner, including you.  I particularly don’t necessarily dislike Wallner, but don’t love him either.  But if we compare his stats vs an established MLB DH, they line up very well.

    5 hours ago, Bodie said:

    47 RBIs (170 ABs) versus 35 RBIs (279 ABs) says he's 33% more productive in 60% of his at bats.

    Not similar. Not even in the same ballpark.  

    I don’t want you to misunderstand my point.  People get caught up in name recognition.  Wallner is under team control through 2029 making league minimum next year.  Giancarlo Stanton is making $32M this year and $19M next year.  
    Don’t you think the value Wallner brings, especially if we move him to DH, is worth keeping for a few years while he is making league minimum next year and will reach arbitration in 2027?  The answer should be a resounding yes.

    I'm honestly much more tired of watching and reading about Trevor Larnach. He's more consistent, maybe, but we know what he is and that's average. Wallner and Ks can get frustrating, but when he's on you can see the talent. It just rarely comes through for Larnach anymore. I'd let him walk, keep Wallner and see how the OF transitions with the AAA guys that are banging on the door. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...