Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Are Jhonny Pereda and Mickey Gasper Competing to Be Ryan Jeffers's Backup Next Season?

    Are the two catchers competing to become Ryan Jeffers's primary backup to begin next season? If so, who has the upper hand?

    Cody Schoenmann
    Image courtesy of © Denny Medley-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    Entering the 2025 MLB regular season, catching depth (behind veterans Ryan Jeffers and Christian Vázquez) was one of the most significant short- and long-term areas of concern for the Minnesota Twins. When the season began, Triple-A catchers Jair Camargo and Diego Cartaya were the primary high-minors fallback plans. Both possessing 40-man roster spots, either could have been called up to the majors if one of the two veterans had missed extended time early in the season.

    Yet, following Cartaya's significant struggles at the plate and in the field and Camargo undergoing Tommy John Surgery in June, both players were designated for assignment and have since parted ways with the organization. Interestingly, catcher was one of the few positions relatively unaffected by the trade deadline's mass exodus in the short term, as neither Jeffers nor Vázquez was traded. Yet, the organization seemingly gained a long-term solution at the position, acquiring top catching prospect Eduardo Tait alongside starting pitching prospect Mick Abel in the deal that sent star closer Jhoan Duran to the Philadelphia Phillies.

    Regardless, the position remained unchanged at the major-league level until Vázquez was placed on the 10-day IL with a left shoulder infection in early August. Since Vázquez was placed on the IL, 29-year-old rookie Mickey Gasper has supplanted him as Jeffers's primary backup, earning nine starts at the position. Gasper remained in this role until Jeffers was placed on the 7-day concussion IL retroactive to Sept. 5. In return, fellow 29-year-old backup backstop Jhonny Pereda was recalled from Triple-A St. Paul, inserting himself into the catching mix.

    With Jeffers and Vázquez both on the IL, Gasper and Pereda have become Minnesota's catching tandem since early September, with Pereda earning five starts to Gasper's three. This Saturday, MLB.com's Patrick Donnelly reported that Vázquez is hoping to return before Minnesota's final road trip, which begins Sept. 23. Yet, given the fact that Minnesota is out of playoff contention, there is reason to believe both Jeffers and Vázquez could remain sidelined for the rest of season, with eyes on advancing their respective recoveries into the offseason and entering next Spring Training healthy.

    That being the case, Gasper and Pereda could finish the 2025 regular season as Minnesota's catching tandem. These two being the only two options at the position is a rather bleak reality for the final month of the season. Yet, with Vázquez expected to depart the organization this offseason, there's at least some chance that Gasper and Pereda are in an active competition to become Jeffers's primary backup next season.

    Obviously, the competition won't be won or lost over the next month. Offseason training, Spring Training performance, and overall recency bias (which will manifest next March) will be the deciding factors. Presumably, the team will also explore external additions at that spot over the offseason. Yet, strong performances from one or both of Gasper and Pereda could function as a springboard toward earning the upper hand. Let's take a look at how both players have performed since Jeffers was placed on the IL on Sept. 5:

    • Gasper - .154/.214/.154, 14 plate appearances, two hits, zero doubles, zero home runs, one walk, 14.3% strikeout rate, 5 wRC+
    • Pereda - .400/.471/.533, 17 plate appearances, six hits, two doubles, zero home runs, two walks, 23.5% strikeout rate, 184 wRC+

    Obviously, 31 combined plate appearances is an exceptionally small sample. Yet, Pereda has significantly outperformed Gasper at the plate over the past two weeks. Pereda has driven the ball hard (54.5% hard hit rate) for extra bases, while posting a respectable 23.5% strikeout rate. On the other hand, Gasper has performed at a subpar rate, continuing the season-long trend of being one of the least effective hitters in baseball.

    When assessing the defensive acumen of both backstops, Pereda again has the edge, generating 1 Defensive Run Saved (DRS) over 44 innings at the position compared to Gasper's -1 DRS over 92 innings. Pereda has the upper hand in FanGraphs's framing metric, sporting -0.1 FRM (which is effectively average) compared to Gasper's -0.8 FRM. Pereda also sports better blocking, pop time, and caught stealing metrics than Gasper, lending merit to the idea that Pereda is the overall superior option and possesses the inside track on Gasper heading into 2026.

    Again, a poor Spring Training performance from Pereda, a strong Spring Training performance from Gasper, or team decision-makers ultimately electing to sign or trade for an established veteran catcher this offseason could make the prospect of Pereda winning the Opening Day backup catcher gig moot. Yet, given Minnesota's expected spending restrictions this offseason and Gasper's inability to perform at the plate or in the field, there is reason to believe Pereda is the favorite to begin next season as Jeffers's primary backup.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Pereda would be a serviceable back up.  He is a much better defensive catcher than Gasper that also has some positional flexibility.  Pereda has played 107G at 1B in the minors.  He is a career .296 hitter in AAA (5 seasons) and .240 in MLB over a small sample size.  Defensively he has a MLB CS rate of 24% (small sample size) and MiLB CS rate of 33%, both of which are better than Jeffers.  We could do quite a bit worse as a back up.

    Personally though, I think we have to we shoot for better if we can.  I really like the idea of trading for long term cost controlled C/1B.  There are a some options that could become available, depending on circumstances that unfold during the offseason.  Austin Wells or Ben Rice from NYY if Judge moves to 1B.  Moises Ballesteros or Miguel Amaya from Cubs as they currently have 4 C's rostered.  All of these guys would be controllable through at least 2029.

    There is also the possibility of trading for a long term C to take some pressure off development of Tait.  Harry Ford (blocked by Cal Raleigh), White Sox have Teel, Quero, and Lee...Lots of possibilities.

    20 hours ago, Dave Borton said:

    There is no way Gasper should be considered for the C position going forward. This is MLB, not AAA.

    Someone mentioned Rohrvedt. He is hitting .340 over last 15 games. He has been starting a ton as of late for Dodgers as the Dodgers wind down their season. Rick Monday does radio color for the LAD and he has been extremely complementary of Rohrvedt's work behind the plate.

    Filling the C position is tough. Doubly tough is finding that catcher who can work with what promises to be a very, very young pitching staff. 

    Open the wallet that defies opening.

    Rortvedt has been a pretty good veteran defensive catcher. It'd take some time to undo what MN & NYY have done with him as far as hitting. Maybe LAD has straightened him out & is worth the shot. I'd do it in a second.

    Our catching is a mess. Falvey loves Jeffers, but I can't see (& don't blame) the Pohlads OKing the hefty extension that Jeffers would demand. That leaves Falvey trading Jeffers for something rather than losing him for nothing. Gasper isn't a MLB catcher & Pereda is only a 3rd catcher. That leaves MN with 2 big holes that Falvey won't fill. What really bugs me is Falvey's lack of priority at catcher. 

    13 minutes ago, Doctor Gast said:

    Our catching is a mess. Falvey loves Jeffers, but I can't see (& don't blame) the Pohlads OKing the hefty extension that Jeffers would demand. That leaves Falvey trading Jeffers for something rather than losing him for nothing. Gasper isn't a MLB catcher & Pereda is only a 3rd catcher. That leaves MN with 2 big holes that Falvey won't fill. What really bugs me is Falvey's lack of priority at catcher. 

    He's drafted several, and just traded for two. He signed Vazquez to a big deal. That sounds like a priority to me. 

    1 hour ago, Mike Sixel said:

    He's drafted several, and just traded for two. He signed Vazquez to a big deal. That sounds like a priority to me. 

    The signing of Jason Castro,  coach Tanner Swanson & then later Vazquez after trading most of our very good catching core away, I can't dispute the value that Flavine put on catching in the beginning, but more control that Falvey has taken over, the less I see. Why didn't they value Swanson's value of developing catching & promote him, instead of letting him walk? Since he left, the Twins haven't developed a single catcher. Congers is a joke. At the premium positions, they have drafted quite a few SSs & some CFers in the 1st round. How many catchers have they drafted in the 1st round? NONE. In the last few years, how high have they drafted a catcher? With Vazquez's contract up & Jeffers's FA coming up, where is the Twins' backup plan? There should have been a backup plan years ago. What good is it to draft low draft prospects if we can't develop them? What good is it to trade for a prospect that isn't expected to come up to the MLB for another 3 yrs or if it's possible that the Twins can even develop him into a catcher? When we need a MLB primary & backup catcher NOW! IMO, this isn't giving catching any priority, so we can be a competitor; it's what we can do so we can just scrape by at this position & say we did something.

    1 hour ago, Doctor Gast said:

    The signing of Jason Castro,  coach Tanner Swanson & then later Vazquez after trading most of our very good catching core away, I can't dispute the value that Flavine put on catching in the beginning, but more control that Falvey has taken over, the less I see. Why didn't they value Swanson's value of developing catching & promote him, instead of letting him walk? Since he left, the Twins haven't developed a single catcher. Congers is a joke. At the premium positions, they have drafted quite a few SSs & some CFers in the 1st round. How many catchers have they drafted in the 1st round? NONE. In the last few years, how high have they drafted a catcher? With Vazquez's contract up & Jeffers's FA coming up, where is the Twins' backup plan? There should have been a backup plan years ago. What good is it to draft low draft prospects if we can't develop them? What good is it to trade for a prospect that isn't expected to come up to the MLB for another 3 yrs or if it's possible that the Twins can even develop him into a catcher? When we need a MLB primary & backup catcher NOW! IMO, this isn't giving catching any priority, so we can be a competitor; it's what we can do so we can just scrape by at this position & say we did something.

    Lack of ability to develop them doesn't show lack of priority. That's a different problem, that we agree on.

    1 hour ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Lack of ability to develop them doesn't show lack of priority. That's a different problem, that we agree on.

    ??? I'm glad we agree that Twins don't have the ability to develop catchers. But I have great difficulty correlating your statement that not hiring good catching coaches does not show a lack of priority. To me, the fact that Falvey hires & promotes so many coaches who adhere to his analytics shows his real priority is his analytics. Development is only one of a few areas in which I question his present priority in catching.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...