Twins Video
Johan Santana's 2004 campaign was the best season of his career and one of the most dominant performances by a pitcher in modern MLB history. The Minnesota Twins’ lefty dazzled with a combination of pinpoint control and a devastating changeup, earning his first Cy Young Award in a landslide. However, when the MVP voting results were announced, Santana finished sixth despite being statistically superior to many position players who placed ahead of him. Let’s revisit that season and the MVP debate that still lingers.
Santana’s Case for AL MVP
Santana’s numbers in 2004 jump off the page. Over 34 starts, he posted a 20-6 record with an AL-best 2.61 ERA and 0.92 WHIP. He struck out 265 batters in 228 innings, leading the league in strikeouts and K/9 (10.5). His second-half performance was nothing short of legendary as he went 13-0 with a 1.21 ERA in 15 starts, holding opponents to a .155 batting average. There is no question that Santana put the Twins on his back to carry them to the playoffs.
The advanced metrics underscore Santana’s dominance. His 8.8 WAR was the highest among AL pitchers and topped all but one position player in the league. He led the league in ERA+, FIP, WHIP, H/9, and ERA. Despite this, Santana’s sixth-place MVP finish highlighted how voters often overlook pitchers for the award.
The 2004 AL MVP Race
Vladimir Guerrero won the AL MVP, putting together a tremendous season for the Anaheim Angels. Guerrero slashed .337/.391/.598 (.989) with 39 home runs and 126 RBIs. He was the spark plug for a playoff-bound team, leading the league in runs scored (124). However, Guerrero’s WAR (5.6) was far lower than Santana’s, suggesting his overall value didn’t match the same level of excellence.
Manny Ramirez, who finished third, led the AL in OPS (1.009) and home runs (43), cementing his place as one of baseball’s most feared hitters. Gary Sheffield (2nd), David Ortiz (4th), and also received more votes than Santana, despite none surpassing 4.3 WAR. Ichiro Suzuki, who led the league in WAR (9.2), had one of the greatest single-season offensive performances ever, breaking George Sisler’s hits record with 262. Yet, he finished behind Santana in MVP voting, a reflection of the voters’ biases toward sluggers and team success.
Why Santana Deserved More
Pitchers winning MVP is an uphill battle. Historically, only the most transcendent pitching performances, such as Bob Gibson in 1968, Roger Clemens in 1986, or Justin Verlander in 2011, have convinced voters that a hurler was the league’s most valuable player. Santana’s 2004 season deserved to be in that conversation.
Unlike everyday players, pitchers only influence a fraction of their team’s games. But Santana’s influence transcended his starts. His consistency at the top of the rotation set the tone for a Twins team that won the AL Central with a 92-70 record. His dominance in September, when the Twins secured the division, was invaluable. For all his offensive prowess, Guerrero didn’t single-handedly carry the Angels as Santana did the Twins.
WAR provides a compelling argument, as Santana outpaced every MVP contender except Ichiro. His second-half performance, where he essentially made opposing hitters irrelevant, was unmatched in its impact on team success.
Santana’s 2004 season earned him his first Cy Young Award and cemented his place among the game’s elite. Still, his sixth-place MVP finish remains a reminder of how difficult it is for pitchers to gain proper recognition in MVP voting. In hindsight, Santana’s brilliance was the definition of value, and his season stands as one of the best arguments for why pitchers should be included in MVP discussions.
Looking back, Santana’s name deserved to be mentioned alongside Guerrero’s, Ramirez’s, and Ichiro’s in the MVP debate. While he didn’t take home the hardware, Santana’s 2004 will forever remain a season for the ages and one that Twins fans will cherish as one of the most dominant pitching performances ever seen.
What do you think? Did Johan Santana deserve the 2004 MVP? Leave a COMMENT and start the discussion.
Are you interested in Twins history? Then check out the Minnesota Twins Players Project, a community-driven project to discover and collect great information on every player to wear a Twins uniform!
View The Players Project






Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now