Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Twins Should Hope Ryan Jeffers Accepts His Qualifying Offer

    Ryan Jeffers is one of the best offensive catchers in baseball, and the Twins have a chance to keep him for just one more year. They should be hoping it plays out that way.

    Matthew Taylor
    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

     

    The Minnesota Twins made a significant decision Monday, extending Ryan Jeffers a qualifying offer worth $23.15 million for the 2027 season. Jeffers now has until November 17 to decide whether he wants to accept the one-year contract or decline it and enter free agency. If he turns down the offer and signs with another team, the Twins would receive a compensatory draft pick—after the first round, if Jeffers gets more than $50 million in guaranteed money; just before the third, if he signs for less.

    On the surface, that might sound like a pretty good outcome for a team that has consistently operated with a limited payroll. But when looking at the Twins' current roster, their long-term plans at catcher, and the player Jeffers has become, I think Minnesota should be hoping he accepts the offer.

    Jeffers will turn 30 years old next season, and since his breakout campaign in 2024, he has established himself as one of the best offensive catchers in the American League. Among AL catchers, his 115 wRC+ since 2024 ranks third behind only Cal Raleigh and Shea Langeliers. Jeffers is coming off arguably the best season of his career, posting a career-high 2.6 fWAR despite playing in just 92 games because of a broken wrist. When healthy, he's a middle-of-the-order bat at one of the most difficult positions to fill. That's not the type of player the Twins should be eager to lose, especially when the alternative is a draft pick that may or may not turn into a major-league contributor down the road.

    The most obvious reason to bring Jeffers back is the enormous hole the team will have behind the plate if he leaves. If Jeffers declines the qualifying offer, Victor Caratini would become the Twins' primary catcher. Caratini posted a 77 OPS+ in 2026, meaning he was well below average offensively, and his weak throwing arm made him a target for opposing teams looking to run wild on the bases. Pairing him with Alex Jackson (whom the team did not add to the 40-man roster Monday, so he's not even in the organization right now) would create one of the worst catching duos in baseball. The Twins would need to find another solution, and unfortunately, this year's free-agent catching market does not offer many appealing alternatives. Losing Jeffers would mean turning one of the team's most important positions into a major problem.

    Bringing Jeffers back on a one-year deal could fit the Twins' timeline perfectly. Minnesota has an obvious long-term answer at catcher right now, with 2026 third overall pick Vahn Lackey waiting in the wings. However, he's not ready yet. The Twins could use Jeffers to stabilize the position for another season, while allowing Lackey to continue developing without being rushed into a major-league role. When Lackey is ready to take over in 2028, the Twins could transition to him without having committed several years and significant money to Jeffers. A one-year contract would give Minnesota the flexibility it needs, while keeping one of its best players in the lineup.

    Yes, $23.15 million is a lot of money for one player—particularly for a franchise that has spent much of its recent history operating near the bottom of the league in payroll. But there's no such thing as a bad one-year deal when you're paying a player who can provide this kind of value. The Twins would not be taking on the long-term risk of a multi-year contract, and they would have several options if things don't go according to plan. If the team struggles next season, Jeffers could become an attractive trade candidate at the deadline. If Lackey is showing that he is ready to take over the position earlier than anticipated, the Twins could explore moving Jeffers to open up playing time. Either way, Minnesota would have the ability to adjust, without being stuck with a long-term commitment.

    Jeffers's balanced right-handed offensive profile is exactly what the Twins need more (not less) of. Minnesota has consistently struggled to find right-handed power in the middle of its lineup, and Jeffers provides exactly that. He's not a star-caliber slugger, but he's slugged .464 against lefties in the bigs. He wouldn't be an impressive first baseman or DH, but at catcher, this level of production is superb. The Twins have seen what their lineup looks like without Jeffers, and it's not something they should be eager to experience for an entire season.

    Tom Pohlad has repeatedly said that he's willing to invest in this team. Bringing Jeffers back would be a meaningful opportunity to put those words into action. The Twins could make Jeffers their highest-paid player in 2027, while still allocating additional money to improve the roster around him. This does not have to be an either-or situation. Minnesota can retain one of its most important players and still find ways to address other weaknesses. The team needs to improve its pitching, add more reliable bats, and build a roster capable of competing. Losing Jeffers would create another hole that would need to be filled, and that's not a particularly efficient way to spend an offseason.

    There is certainly an argument for Jeffers declining the qualifying offer. The Twins would receive a valuable draft pick, and the $23.15 million could be reallocated to other areas of the roster. But that money would not be entirely free to spend elsewhere. Minnesota would still need to find a legitimate starting catcher, in my opinion, as Caratini isn't a viable starter for a team hoping to compete in 2027. Some of that money would need to go toward addressing the position, and whatever remains would need to make up for the production Jeffers provided. When you consider how difficult it is to find a high-quality catcher, the value of Jeffers's bat, and the flexibility of a one-year deal, it becomes difficult to argue that the Twins would be better off if he turns them down. Of course, the decision is out of their hands, now. They did the right thing by extending Jeffers the offer. The next move is his.


    What do you think? Should the Twins hope Jeffers accepts the $23.15 million qualifying offer, or would you rather see him decline it and give Minnesota a compensatory draft pick? Leave a comment below and start the conversation!

     


    Want to play the role of Twins general manager? Check out our free-to-use "You're The GM" offseason tool and build your own Twins roster!

    Build Your 2027 Roster
    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Yasser Mercedes

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, OF
    On Thursday in the Fall League, Mercedes went 2-for-4 with his first double and his first homer run of the AFL season.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    2 minutes ago, Cris E said:

    When we have some ready catchers to trade in a few years we can do that, but right now our plan is hoping that Caratini trends back toward his career averages at the plate and something, someone, mumble steps up and really takes advantage of his opportunities! 

    For 2027 we're in the market for a catcher because we have a gap in our development Pipeline at the position and we can't just slide someone over.  This year we need to go out and get a bandaid or go big and retain a stud. 

    The GIF Oracle would like to show you some terrible punting | SB Nation

    2 hours ago, JBK said:

    I'm advocating for a backup catcher.  Not an alternative to Ryan Jeffers.

    I might have been clearer that my first paragraph was intended to explain why Pineda isn't a better alternative to Caratini and Jackson.  The remainder of the post was back to the topic of the article.

    2 hours ago, Cris E said:

    What? I assume the 6/95 is a typo, but there have been many catcher contracts for more then $40m handed out in the recent past. In fact Sean Murphy signed a six year $73m extension in 2022, JT Realmuto signed his 3/$45m deal last year at the age of 34,  Kirk from TOR got his 5 year $58m extension in March 2025, Will Smith did a ten year $140m before the 2024 season, and so on. Lots of rich contracts. 

    If you want to confine yourself to free agents only that's your choice, but the market is set by what others are getting paid and who is available, and Jeffers has got scarcity and a lot of other contracts going for him, establishing a rough valuation around $12-15m.  

    Murphy was younger than Ryan is now when he signed that so there isn’t the length into old age. The last year is a team option  still, a 12 million a year AAX is not going to get the Twins a comp pick   Kirk got out of signing for his free agent years were at 12 million a year with the contract expiring after his age 1 season  In regards to Realmuto and Smith. In what universe has Jeffers done what they gave done to get their money? That is why I didn’t say anything about them. I have never seen anyone compare Jeffers to them. Realmuto’s last contract from what I read was based on legacy and loyalty to the team.   Smith’s contract value drops after age 2. There is 35 million in deferred money,. 

    Also worth noting that Caratini was a league average hitter until this season, so he could bounce back.  His big hot streak this summer was when he was catching full time during Jeffers' time away. 

    I've noticed that Vic doesn't get much respect around here. I have a feeling he'll have a bounce-back year and surprise some folks.

    6 hours ago, Road trip said:

    But... if 1 WAR equals approximately 8 million of market value (that seems to be the sabermetric consensus), then Jeffers in 2026 was worth approximately 8 * 2.8 BWAR = 22.4 million.  So, the QO is right in range for his 2026 production.

    You could certainly argue that Jeffers isn't necessarily likely to match last year's production, but I don't know it is a massive overpay.

    This year's free agent market may be an odd one, with a labor stoppage likely, but $15MM AAV would be a bargain for Jeffers if he can continue to match his 2026 production, especially given the fact that there are no other good catchers on the market.

    FWIW, MLBTR projects Jeffers to earn 4 years/ 75 mil.  That seems high to me, but it is another data point.

    Teams lean on fWAR rather than bWAR, typically. Also teams haven't consistently paid $8MM for expected WAR in my analysis, they try to pay $6MM. $8MM is the cost that teams get because players underperform their expectations.

    Team expects player A to produce 4 WAR. They pay the player more like $6MM per WAR expected so about $24MM AAV per year. Player A actually produces 3 WAR because they fail to live up to expectations due to injury or regression or decline so the net the cost of the contract is $8MM per WAR.

    Yes, it's pretty easy to argue a player with almost no track record using a completely different plate approach than they'd had their entire career crossing over into age 30+ seasons on the tail of a career year could be risky.

    It's tough to say how teams will evaluate him. Do they think he can repeat this past year but with more PA? Are they willing to treat him as a 3+ WAR player and give him a premium due to a tight market? Or are they going to view him as a relatively average MLB catcher and refuse to pay a big premium when they may not view him as a truly great upgrade? Will they be unwilling to part with over-cherished draft picks to sign him? 

    Who knows?

    I agree it was a no-brainer to offer Jeffers, and what the heck, it's just a one-year contract.  There is almost no risk to offering.  Catcher is a big issue for 2027, even if Caratini DOES bounce back to a degree, which I think he will.  But Tom Pohlad needs to put his money where his mouth has been and get the Twins closer to what may become a negotiated "salary floor" even if that concept isn't applied until 2028.

    The Twins will either have Jeffers for a 2027 bridge year for Lackey, or they will receive some sort of draft compensation.  I think the idea of offering Jeffers 3-years, $45 million or 3-years and $50 million is also a good idea.  An offer like that could push the Yankees or Cubs to make an offer that easily clears $50 million and that pushes the Twins draft compensation to end of 1st round.  Having Jeffers around for 3 more years is not necessarily a BAD option.  

    I would pursue RP options that do not include Bednar and Morejon.  There are other good options that would not take a draft pick away from the Twins.  

    Jeffers, and finding bullpen help along with one bat, is part of a litmus test for the Twins. 

    We won't know whether Jeffers rejects or accepts the QO for two weeks unless he comes out with a decision before the deadline. An early decision helps because adding $23M to the roster numbers will change some possible moves. Hopefully Jeffers can make his decision this week. 

    Zoll (the entire front office) together with Tom Pohlad (if he needs to be in on everything) can get to work right now, particularly on smaller actions. There are opportunities to address the roster through transactions and trades. There is no reason to wait.

    19 hours ago, old nurse said:

    Lot of names, none are a free agent signing..

    The discussion becomes preposterous when somebody brought up the Contreras signing. Ryan’s career pre free agency does not even begin to compare to Contreras’ lead up to free agency.  Even then  6/95 should signal Jefferson is not going to get that kind of contract.  So that leaves Vasquez 3/30 and McCann 4/40 as long term contracts given out since 2020. Teams are not signing catchers long term 

    From the MLBTR article explaining their 4/$75M projection: 

    If this number seems high, consider that the .254/.342/.440 slash Jeffers has posted in 1632 plate appearances since 2023 is a near-mirror image of the .249/.349/.467 line posted by Willson Contreras in 1604 plate appearances across the four years that preceded his own free agency. He landed five years and $87.5MM — with similar defensive concerns and a qualifying offer. Our prediction here is that Jeffers will land a bit shy of Contreras’ five-year, $87.5MM deal but a bit north of the $73MM Yasmani Grandal received in 2019.

     

    Based on that, it seems Contreras and Jeffers do compare. Additionally, MLBTR also didn't include any allowance for inflation. The QO has gone up, what, 15 percent in the past three years? If that's a proxy for overall salary inflation, Contreras's deal moves to the neighborhood of 5/$100M. Contreras was also two years older at the time than Jeffers is now.

    7 minutes ago, IndianaTwin said:

    From the MLBTR article explaining their 4/$75M projection: 

    If this number seems high, consider that the .254/.342/.440 slash Jeffers has posted in 1632 plate appearances since 2023 is a near-mirror image of the .249/.349/.467 line posted by Willson Contreras in 1604 plate appearances across the four years that preceded his own free agency. He landed five years and $87.5MM — with similar defensive concerns and a qualifying offer. Our prediction here is that Jeffers will land a bit shy of Contreras’ five-year, $87.5MM deal but a bit north of the $73MM Yasmani Grandal received in 2019.

     

    Based on that, it seems Contreras and Jeffers do compare. Additionally, MLBTR also didn't include any allowance for inflation. The QO has gone up, what, 15 percent in the past three years? If that's a proxy for overall salary inflation, Contreras's deal moves to the neighborhood of 5/$100M. Contreras was also two years older at the time than Jeffers is now.

    I hope Jeffers gets the money. Note that Willson Contreras last caught more than 50 games in 2023. Contreras is not a catcher, but then again Jeffers isn't likely much longer either. For those enamored with WAR, Jeffers has one season of 3 and 3 seasons above 2 WAR and only 4 seasons above 1. Contreras has 2 seasons above 4, 8 years above 3, and 11 where he reached 1 or higher WAR. I think the only comparison is that neither is much as a catcher. Otherwise it is a very slim comparison.

    2 minutes ago, tony&rodney said:

    I hope Jeffers gets the money. Note that Willson Contreras last caught more than 50 games in 2023. Contreras is not a catcher, but then again Jeffers isn't likely much longer either. For those enamored with WAR, Jeffers has one season of 3 and 3 seasons above 2 WAR and only 4 seasons above 1. Contreras has 2 seasons above 4, 8 years above 3, and 11 where he reached 1 or higher WAR. I think the only comparison is that neither is much as a catcher. Otherwise it is a very slim comparison.

    Some have framed it as making a longer-term offer to Jeffers with the assumption that he'd be moving to 1B/DH by the end of the contract, which I think at least makes sense in the context of the "bridge to Lackey" concept.

    When I looked at baseball-reference, I also saw that one of the four seasons in the Contreras equation was 2020, so it's really comparing his 3.375 seasons to Jeffers's four. That points to the reality of Contreras having caught a higher percentage of his team's games in those season.

    I do think the 4/$75M is a better guestimate than the 3/$45-ish that others have suggested. As to whether or not I want the Twins to take part, it really has to do with how they are thinking about the rest of the budget.

    People are comparing a few statements from Tom with the teams' recent history, when in reality none of us knows the answer to that question. If the supposed increase is to $130M, then they need to be more judicious and Jeffers is a tighter fit. If the increase is such that it will allow for a modest overpay for a slot or two, then I'm more on board with catcher being a place for that, given the overall shape of their roster and their potential inhouse replacements.   

    3 hours ago, IndianaTwin said:

    From the MLBTR article explaining their 4/$75M projection: 

    If this number seems high, consider that the .254/.342/.440 slash Jeffers has posted in 1632 plate appearances since 2023 is a near-mirror image of the .249/.349/.467 line posted by Willson Contreras in 1604 plate appearances across the four years that preceded his own free agency. He landed five years and $87.5MM — with similar defensive concerns and a qualifying offer. Our prediction here is that Jeffers will land a bit shy of Contreras’ five-year, $87.5MM deal but a bit north of the $73MM Yasmani Grandal received in 2019.

     

    Based on that, it seems Contreras and Jeffers do compare. Additionally, MLBTR also didn't include any allowance for inflation. The QO has gone up, what, 15 percent in the past three years? If that's a proxy for overall salary inflation, Contreras's deal moves to the neighborhood of 5/$100M. Contreras was also two years older at the time than Jeffers is now.

    Based on that one of the 4 years was the Covid  shortened year for Contreras . Other than that Contreras was consistently in the  3+. WAR range. Also Contreras was deemed an all star. Ryan has not been in that range. 

    On 11/3/2026 at 7:14 AM, Whitey333 said:

    So you really think Jeffers is worth 23.15 million for one year?  Sheer lunacy.  He may accept it just to make the Twins up the ante so to speak.  23 mill for an average catcher and 23 mill for a pitcher, Lopez, coming back from Tommy john surgery after not playing las year.  Talk about overpay.  

    I'm sure others have beat me to it, but Jeffers being worth 23 million isn't the topic.  Sometimes you pay someone more than they're worth.  Like when he's a good player and you have no reasonable alternatives and you're not going to do anything worthwhile with the money anyway and you're only committed to one year and you have what supposed to be a top prospect possible one year or so away.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...