Cody Christie Twins Daily Contributor Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.com/content.php?r=1683-Twins-Behind-in-Golden-Age-of-Leadoff-Hitter
jareddejong42 Verified Member Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 I don't think this should be suprising considering the Twins traded two prototypical lead of hitters in the offseason. Moves like that are going to put a team behind the curve at a particular position. All this is not to debate the success of the trades as only time will tell.
ThePuck Provisional Member Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 I don't think this should be suprising considering the Twins traded two prototypical lead of hitters in the offseason. Two? Span and who else?
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 Ignoring Puck, it really isn't surprising. I think we all knew the top of the order could be an issue. But Hicks is still an exciting long term answer. He just needs time.
Westgaard66 Verified Member Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 yeah, definitely agree that trading span/revere and hicks struggles put them behind the curve hell who knows maybe Buxton is the answer there longterm and Hicks is just stop gap unitl he is ready. I could handle a blazing fast bomb launching leadoff hitter
ThePuck Provisional Member Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 Ignoring Puck, it really isn't surprising. I think we all knew the top of the order could be an issue. But Hicks is still an exciting long term answer. He just needs time. why ignoring Puck? Rever is not a protypical leadoff guy. He doesn't get on base enough for that. Speed doesn't equal leadoff hitter.
ThePuck Provisional Member Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 yeah, definitely agree that trading span/revere and hicks struggles put them behind the curve hell who knows maybe Buxton is the answer there longterm and Hicks is just stop gap unitl he is ready. I could handle a blazing fast bomb launching leadoff hitter I hope Buxton ends up being more of a middle of the order guy.
troyhobbs Provisional Member Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 Unless or until they sputter Dozier and Carroll are serviceable leadoff guys. In my mind Hicks has a long way to go before he merits a move up in the order.
jay Provisional Member Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 I guess I don't find the Twins production vs MLB at leadoff particularly relevant at this point. We could do this same exercise for any other spot in the lineup that Hicks had been primarily consuming. All we're really doing here is pointing out that Aaron Hicks has struggled badly.
ashbury Verified Member Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 I hope Buxton ends up being more of a middle of the order guy. Could say the same of Hicks.
ThePuck Provisional Member Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 Could say the same of Hicks. could not agree more.
ashbury Verified Member Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 could not agree more. Could start a sentence with noun or pronoun. But am lazy.
ThePuck Provisional Member Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 Could start a sentence with noun or pronoun. But am lazy. haha
Pius Jefferson Verified Member Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 Golden Age of lead-off hitters? A tad overzealous for less than 1/5 of the season. I like the idea of Aaron Hicks being a lead off hitter with some pop.
ashbury Verified Member Posted May 9, 2013 Posted May 9, 2013 I like the idea of Aaron Hicks being a lead off hitter with some pop. Rickey Henderson sometimes led off a game with some pop; not a bad way to start. A middle-of-the-order guy (see above) with additional l33t skillz can slot multiple places in the batting order.
Kaelen Culpepper St. Paul Saints - AAA SS At long last, Kaelen Culpepper has been called up to the Twins! Explore Kaelen Culpepper News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.