Rosterman

Well, I'm sure the Twins would rather see Duffey start at Rochester than languish in the bullpen. That leaves a possible spot for O'ROurke to return. Still out: Arcia vs. Quentin. Hicks vs. Walker Mastro vs. Buxton Of course, if the Twins would add Hicks or Mastro, they need to clear 40-man space.

Hopefully Tonkin won't be claimed. The team would have to keep him on the 40-man. Of course, they could always send him thru and chances are he wouldn't be claimed then. Which is the pain of this process. They need to be kept on some roster for a certain amount of time if claimed. Nolasco and Duffey. Maybe one goes. Or they flip-flop in the bullpen. But if Duffey doesn't start up here he'll start at Rochester. I see them going with Duffey out of spring training and IF he has a couple of bad starts, he goes down and Nolasco goes back to the rotation and the Twins have to decide on long-man lefty Rogers or short-man O'Rourke. Right now, it is Duffey's job to lose (let's not give him pressure, folks!)

I would also stretch out J.R. Graham as a starter at Rochester. Nolasco does put a damper on things, and there is still a slim chance he might push out Duffey, which means another lefty in the bullpen (I would imagine or hope). The question is, with Abad being added, who is removed from the 40-man (Pat Dean). Although many have had fine performances in spring training, there is no need to make other 40-man roster changes. The only other oddity would be if Buxton DID go to Rochester and the Twins put Mastro in centerfield. (No chance of Kepler breaking camp instead of Buxton?) Fien is also a BIG question mark. Will be become, say, the next Jared Burton. Or will he have a typical Fien Season and possibly be used as tradebait in the summer. Hoping a player becomes tradable is always a lovely option (Nolasco). There is, really, no room in the"inn" unless someone goes on the DL in the next 10 days.

Anyone know the situation with Zach Jones over in Milwaukee? I don't see any stats on him. Chance the Twins get a return in the Rule 5?

It is always nice to know that there is someone down on the farm to step up if need be, not just to be backup but potentially to be a line-up placesetter. All you need is a chance, sometimes. And all you need is that one good season fo success when given the chance. The organizational prospects are actually a good year away from even stepping into backup roles with potential lineup replacement. So good signings by Ryan. Of course, we also had Allen de san Miguel all last year getting what, a handful of at bats?

Well, they can have him in the pen this season, hopefully keep him stretched out so he could make emergency starts and pitch 120+ innings like Swarzak in the past. If he remains in the pen into 2017, it will hurt HIS arbitration salaries the next couple of seasons, if he hangs in that long, and when he finally gets a chance to maybe start for the Twins he will be 30 and a free agent and would probably get something better elsewhere. But right now, he is a solid arm, hopefully, in the pen. The Twins have four solid guys, but still need a lefty beyond Perkins, and another long guy might be nice (lefty). And who knows where Nolasco and Milone fit in...I mean Duffey COULD start at Rochester for all that management might care. Combined with a could of aging vets on the bench, we can just wonder why the Twins continue to hold back the future.

Regarding at bats. It's going out and getting a couple of at bats everyday for the regulars, if possible. And you want them to match up against guys they might be facing, rather than prospects. Same with pitchers, you want them to face the meat of a team rather than the future, see how they handle it. And like Tyler Duffey in his apst start, you get into trouble, but you need to show how you adapt and get out of trouble (Nolasco has to be inthe same boat.) I like the notes about Luke Hughes. When making a decision on, say, backup catcher...do you go with the hot Hicks who may have more limited at bats in the beginning of the season and let the more seasoned Murphy start at Rochester, or what. Of course, having spots to play with on the 40-man is important. Hate to see anyone go on the 60-day just to open up a spot. And you do risk losing guys, which is why decisions on Arcia, Santana and especially Tonkin will asat until the end days.

Two Questions! Will the Twins ever ever give a contract of this size to a player again, be he homegrown or from outside (see the future Sano, Berrios, etc)? Did the Twins make a mistake not only drafting the hometown kid #1 but giving him a franchise salary because he is a hometown kid? Back when Joe was signed, the word seemed to fly that Pohlad would be run out of town if Joe signed with the Red Sox or anyone else for anything. He was and is the face of the franchise...at the time of the signing. My, how a few years, a position shift and some health issues change the entire picture. Joe Mauer was/is good for the franchise. He is the hometown poster boy. He still plays ball. He could easily sit out the rest of his career and heal, it is not beyond comprehension that the body and mind should be taken care of before the team. You can't trade him, although if he has a tremendous season and someone (anyone) is looking for a first baseman, you should consider freeing up the salary. But chances of that happening (see Ryan Howard) are not all that great. Sorry. He, sadly, brings nothing exceptional to another team to tie up that amount of salary. I always felt that the Pohlad's needed to take Joe's salary out of the payroll equation in the beginning and thru the length of the contract and put it in the advertising/goodwill department of the team's budget. He is a fixture. He was a necessary need for the team at the time and serves best not eating up payroll that you should be expending on other players. His shoudl be that contract above and beyond. Regarding playing time, he needs to earn his way. He may be the best at the moment, if you can find someplace else to play someone. And because he IS on the team and eating up salary, he will push aside the Kennys Vargas and cause you to maybe slow the progression of, say, Max Kepler as his replacement. The bigger question will be where does Joe go after 2019 and how much will it cost to keep him around and can you find a place for him in the lineup or on the bench. If the money is right, you can always give a bench spot to a Thome-like player...a guy who comes off the bench in a situational and does something (hopefully). It's nice if he can play another position. Sure, it would be wonderful if you could plug Joe into the outfield or third base if the call came. Man, even Harmon Killebrew played first, third and the outfield after starting as a middle infielder. 2016 will be a telling year for Mauer and the Twins. Park has to show that he is a threat to stay in the lineup. The Twins need to find a space for Sano, especially if other outfield prospects develop. But we don't know that for this season and won't have a good handle until we head into the next season, and Joe can still be a valuable cog at first base even in 2017 as, who knows who will still be in the mix.

Still gotta cut 27 players. That's a lot of extra bodies. See more happening by Wednesday/Thursday once minor league games really get going. We must remember that guys can always cross the field from minor league camp to play in a game. I see the big question coming with the guys out of options and if the Twins gamble that no one will claim them: Tonkin, Arcia, Santana. That would open three 40-man spots. But I really don't want to see journeymen get major league spots this year. It will be an interesting spring of roster construction.

Well, if Santana DOESN'T step up, and Arcia continues to have trouble, he gets the spot out of a process of elimination, unless the Twins wish to fill the outfield spot with guys NOT on the 40-man, which means they have to get rid of some folks (like Santana and Arcia). I'm just hoping Rosario contributes. And Kepler could still be the dark horse candidate in the mix. If a guy is hungry, and produces, you might just take him North and send the other to Rochester! Spring training is more than stats. It's how the prospects react to coaching, work at their skills and show some consistency. And then you hope they keep doing that once the season begins rather than return to old comfortable ways/

The main reason to reassign someone from the 40-man to minor league camp is if they have NO POSSIBLE way to make the roster (doesn't mean they can't if someone is injured) is to keep from paying them a major league salary if they get disabled during spring training. I do imagine Tonkin will get more of a leash than, say, Aaron Thompson. And they will want to see Rogers in a couple of situationals (middle of an inning, facing one batter or two) I imagine.

This is going to be an interesting watch. Especially since Rosario could pull a Santana 2.0 and NOT be a surefire left-fielder. The vets will try and pull a spot (which means the Twins have to find 40-man places). Overall, the fight for bench positions may be strong this spring. Will it be Murphy (who could play fulltime at Rochester) or Hicks. Nunez or Santana or any of the other guys, if they step up. Arcia and Vargas to stay or go. Sweeney, Mastro, Quentin -- major league money looks much better than AAAA salaries. The only surefire lock in the outfield would seem to be Sano. Buxton NEEDS to win the job. Kepler could sneak in. Santana is in the roster fight of his life. Arcia could be cut...and if he plays badly in spring, the Twins may catch a break and get to keep him down on the farm for another season. The BENCH IS IN FLUX two weeks into spring training!

Great preview!

If Nolasco is worthy of a rotation role, he gets it. He might also spark some interest in a team short a starter (assuming he puts up the right spring training numbers) and a team might trade something for him, if the Twins eat salary. A team would NOT claim Noalsco if he has a bad spring. But the Twins would still be on the hook for his entire salary minus a percentage of the major league minimum for the next two seasons. A great tryout bargain for any low-level team in need of a possible stopgap. If he does start in the bullpen, he could slip into a rotation role if Duffey struggles or someone goes down for an injury (think Pelfrey last season) and since it seems doubtful that the Twins WILL add Berrios to the 40-man any sooner than necessary.... Nolasco wants to start? Good. It is his ball to throw and show he deserves to start. He gets paid, nor what. But if he wants to continue playing ball past next season, he will have to produce. And if he produces he becomes a valuable trading chip in the least and a real contributor to the team at best, forcing the Twins to make a decision on the others in the rotation (Milone and his no options, Santana and Hughes and their salaries, and Gibson and his controlled contract). Any member of the Twins rotation could have trade value IF they produce, which is the name of the game. If a pitcher doesn't produce, that's the tough decision...since it is all about money (and a lot of money) then.

Just go with the best 25 and move on from those questionable. Because? There is still more coming up behind these guys.

It's a tough call. You are faced with free agency walkouts. You advance players (Liam Hendricks) before their time. You shuffle players around, fight injuries, make bad longterm and short-term signings. You have to always look at the competitive balance first within your division, and go from there. You have to spend money at the right times. You have to eventually put butts in the seats. The Twins did win TWO World Series. They had 1965, a nice string at the end/beginning of that decade, a great run in the new century. Other teams may wish that they did so well, jsut like the Twins may wish they had the budgets of other teams NOT doing so well. It's that magical moment when the players coming up jell with the players you sign. They ALL don't leave at the same time for bigger paychecks. And maybe you do some shrewd Billy Beane moves. Every team has turnover. Every team has failed prospects. Every team has bad signings. Every team gets injuries. From my arm chair, it is really a tough tough job.

We also have to admit that the 2015 season, we wanted the Twins to improve. Few expected them to be in the hunt to the final weekend. They did improve, just a tad better than the best we hoped for...most people were hoping they would approach, say, 75 wins. The call is still out on Santana. We can't do anything but cut Nolasco, so we need to give him one more look. Hughes, most feel, shouldn't have been extended. Now that he has, Ryan should be willing to trade him if he shows drastic improvement over 2015. The reason for trading Plouffe, future cost. He is still worth his salary this season (we hope). But is he a $10 million player? Could he have been packaged with another Twin of some value (Kyle Gibson, perhaps) with a bigger return from another club. I don't like reading that Sano MIGHT NOT get time at third base, as Plouffe is still a tradeable asset during mid-season, and would hope that Sano gets some time there (which is why I would have rather seen the reverse, start Plouffe in the outfield if need be and Sano at third and go from there, if we are keeping him). If something happens to Plouffe I don't want to see Nunez or any of the infielders signed for AAA playing there fulltime, of even a switch of Escobar so we can see more of Polanco. Yes, you do buy a top-flight free agent if you are in a position to win the pennant and move onto the World Series? Are the Twins there yet? No. They are still thinking about their rebuilding blocks, staying competitive to keep the fans coming, and playing for 2017 and beyond. Maybe next off-season they will make a major splash as well as potentially rid themselves of some excess payroll. But even then, the guys coming up this year will have to prove themselves again in 2017 that -- good or bad -- what they did this season was not a fluke.

Can we or should we upgrade Escobar? He currently fits well in the infield, and produces, possibly, as well as Ploanco or any of the future prospects (Javier and Gordon) might. He has shown some punch, which puts him above a 1-4 slick-fleldling middle man. He fills in nicely his bottom of the order spot. Going into spring training, you could say the Twins weakest position is up the middle, per say: catcher, shortstop and centerfield. Murphy has a chance to upgrade catching and we are all excited about Buxton. Escobar has shown consistency, moreso than Santana, who will be given a chance to step in if Escobar faulters. We have to hope that Rosario doesn't not become Santana 2.0. What do we want at shortstop? Less errors? More speed? Bigger bat? Escobar played pretty solid ball in each of the past two seasons. He's still young. At worse, he will spend the next decade being a super sub. At best, he might hold down the starting job into the 2018 season.

There is a log jam happening in the outfield. Of course, Kepler could be groomed as a first baseman. Walker will need someplace to play. Who knows the longterm needs of Rosario. If Arcia shines, then we have a lot of trouble. Of course, anyone can be flipped (as the Twins have shown with their centerfield candidates of late.) I'm thinking the Twins will still play wait and see on Sano at third. If there WAS no desire to have Sano play third, then this might've been the time to sign up Plouffe for 3 years with an option. Right now, if I was Plouffe, I would be more than happy with whatever arbitration will bring next season if the Twins are forced to keep him. If Sano is NOT the third baseman of the future, then barring a trade for a third bagger, the Twins will be forced to keep Plouffe, unless.... There is someone on the 2016 off-season scrap heap. But doubtful. Man, the twins 1B/DH/corner outfield situation is getting worse worse worse.

Sometimes it is so amazing how much turnover there is in rosters when you look three, five years out. And how many guys do remain in the minor league system for any length of time.

Your typical team has space for one (maybe two) franchise players. Mauer has one of the spots. The Twins are willing to spend 55% of revenue on payroll,which is a joke. What do you do with the other 45%...and how much of ANY profit the Twins made the apst few years went to buy down their investment in the stadium (which more than doubled their worth) and whose pocket did it go into (do owners make as much, say, as commissioners in their paychecks?). You can invest in free agents. The Twins did the last couple of seasons. Wisely? Who knows. But I doubt that any of the top-flight names were busting down the door to get a Twins offer, which has long been a problem. Even with the worthwhile signing of Josh WIllingham, in the past, Michael Cuddyer managed to still get a much higher paycheck in what had become a diminishing market for outfield talent. Go figure. You have to take chances on Payroll. You have to invest wisely. That is hard when a player gets suspended or injured (look at the rotation). In the past, how could you compete against a team like, say, The Yankees, who are willing to have $30-40 million sitting on the disabled list or in lost contracts each year. The Twins seem to go into major turmoil when they lose one guy, be it Mauer, Nathan, Santana or what. It is tough running a major league team. You don't know how the prospects will pan out. You can be Oakland and flip your roster 40-50% each season, running a revolving door between vets and promise. You can argue the actually need to do a longterm expensive contract (Mauer) and cringe when you hear what a Trout or others may be offered in the future (was St. Louis wise to let Pujols walk). At what point to you overpay a Sano and hope he stays reasonable, or you let him become someone else's worry. We just don't really know how to follow the money in this sport. What really goes where (draft picks, international signings, minor league operations) and what ownership takes for their pockets or reinvestment in stadium bricks. Players make the most of it and demand whatever they can get for their services, and everytime someone gets a big contract, it makes it harder to sign certain levels of players, and leaves many others out in the cold as "not worth it." The Twins always seemed happy to put a competitive team on the field, to hopefully draw the fans and aim towards the playoffs. Is a competitive team one that plays slightly above .500 (like last year's team) or comes in close to a spot in the post season (also last year's team). The assumption is that EVERY team does WANT to be competitive. (We might see it in the Central in 2016 where f-8 games MIGHT separate the first team from the last). Fantasy baseball began when us common folks wanted to see what kind of team we could put together given x-amount of dollars. We all know how that game works...especially when each year you get to spend for the now, not the hereafter.

I am still a member of the Alex Wimmers fan club!

At this point, he is being passed on the prospect starting scale by Gonsalves, Jay and ever Stewart. He might be able to hang onto a longman position. The good news is that if the Twins can develop him as a reliever he will be a fairly cheap addition to the bullpen for the next 3-5 years. Does he have closer potential, that is a question.

The anatomy of a trade. Whew! Always wondered about Brian Buchanan (who. I believe, is coaching in the Royals system). He had his chances, but... I truly thought Oliveros would make the team in 2015. But even after missing out in spring training, he went down and out. Neagle and Erickson, well maybe not Erickson, were interesting losses...one due to contract, the other due to the need for a vet presence. All from a guy named Chuck!

Yeah, this is a tough one. We aren't getting many dingers from the catching spot, which made Mauer so valuable as a catcher...he could hit 10-12 dingers, plus the high average. That's weakness number one, now transfered to 1B, which becomes weakness #2, except that he is the Twins leader in getting and it doesn't matter how you egt a guy home sometimes, as long as he comes home. Dozier hits for good power at second base, yet do we need to drop him down in the order and would he regress coming up with two outs, say, rather than leading off. Escobar was a surprise with his power last season. is power more important than putting the ball in play is always the question. Sano at third would supply more punch and even a betetr average than Plouffe, but would Arcia in right do better than the current play places of Sano and Plouffe, that is the question. If you want home runs, give us a FULL season of Arcia and let's see what happens. Buxton will just have to hit and it may seem like the braintrust is playing him like Go-Go Gomez and making him use his bat and speed to get and move around bases. He will become a power-hitting centerfielder at some point. Rosario is really an enigma. He hits doubles and triples to go with his homers. He hits for a decent, not spectacular average. Unless he does show a gain in average and punch this season, he will be on the bubble. On the bench, Nunez has some power, as does Murphy. Santana, playing parttime and as a reserve? Well, let's say that if he starts the year in centerfield, he will hit more home runs than Buxton would in 2016. The Twins have the chance to get 30-35+ from Sano and Park, although both are still unproven for the long haul. They have a slugger in Arcia who needs playing time. They have no power at first or catcher...when you think that Escobar could hit more diners, or an equal amount of dingers for the pair combined. Sigh. What matters more is actually getting the runners home at some point, and putting yourself in a position to also score a run./