And this is why I feel that coaching at the highest professional levels is overrated. Not unimportant or irrelevant, but overrated. The manager gets too much blame and too little credit. Does he get credit for some of last season's unexpected success? Sure he does. But he also gets his fair share of the blame for this season. Fair share of blame on a 100 loss season is going to be larger than credit for an 85 win season with largely the same roster. There were games that this team won last season despite Molitor, just as there are games that they've lost this season because of him. That being said, there are plenty of reasons for his dismissal that can only fall on the manager. Lineup construction, in game moves, unexplainable bro-mances with overmatched players, poor bullpen use/overuse, sitting prospects, etc. Player development falls into the middle ground. It's on the player to improve as well, but the coaches need to help - that is why they're there to begin with. Therefore, I feel that department is a shared responsibility, but coupled with the previously mentioned reasons only makes the case to retain Molitor that much thinner. A manager should be putting players in the best position for them to succeed and I don't feel that he does that.