I don’t think that’s what people think at all. I think the disconnect is in not realizing if not Baldelli, it will be someone who manages very similarly. I don’t think a change in manager means a change in philosophy. Most seem to want a manager who manages the way managers did 20-30 years ago, for a game they long for that isn’t really where the game is today. When Baldelli was hired, the one point that was made was how there was a similar mindset as the FO, that they all were of one mind. My post, which was quoted by the poster you quoted, didn’t capture that part of my comment. I don’t want someone’s list of who, because of course there are options out there, but the realization that seems to be missing, and the actual disconnect, isn’t that most think the manager is an unchanging entity, but that with this FO, we will likely get someone who manages very similarly. I further said, that I don’t think it matters greatly, and that I won’t be surprised if he stays or if he goes. Your comment almost implies that change for change’s sake is a good thing. Not sure that I agree with that, but change can be good, if it’s the right change.