I understand your point, but I find blanket statements like that as hard to read as any negativity. Although I was not on this website at the time, I was vocal that the contract given to Mauer was not a good one for the Twins. I did not mind a long term contract, but the size of the contract and the guaranteed money was too much for a player not yet on the open market who had only shown power for one season. I was vocal about releasing David Ortiz and trading Rod Carew years ago as well. Both are low points in Twins history. I was upset about Ortiz on day one, but that front office mistake was worse in hindsight. Carew wanted out because the Twins were cheap, and Griffith showed just how cheap he was by trading Carew instead of trying to trade for better players around him. I would have liked the Twins to play hardball with Johan Santana to keep him with the Twins rather than trade him to the Mets for failed players. The Twins were contenders, and one more year of Santana could have meant another playoff run - even if just for one season. The Twins had some leverage with that last season under contract. They could have said, "Play out this year, and lose potential money, or sign an extention, and get paid more now and later." Allowing the Mets to negotiate with Santana was a mistake. It would have been a gamble, but what isn't in baseball? My point is that some people had differing opinions along the way. We did not agree to anything 99%, and that makes for a better fan base and a better board. It also makes some people sound negative while others sound optimistic. As long as posters stick to facts and make logical arguments, there should be room for discussion. Otherwise, we are all just blowing wind, and that is almost as bad as blowing hot air.