It really does matter what one considers league average in regards to what numbers one is looking at when making that determination. Then one has to consider how much growth is left in the player He's not the caliber pitcher that those other guys are, but in fairness, their contracts were/are longer and worth way more overall. No one was going to give him Scherzer money or Kershaw money overall. On top of that, I envision way more names entering that zone here soon with all the money being thrown around. So, I mean, I get what you are saying and not saying you are wrong at all, but the article I showed sort of explained how this kind of contract was coming if he saw the open market. Here's another article about the signing: 'Porcello has been consistently above average, topping two wins in each of the last four seasons. His 2.7 WAR from last year ranked 28th in the American League, but his 5.5 WAR over the last two years is 17th, and his 8.1 fWAR over the past three seasons ranks 14th in the AL during that time. Through his Age-25 season, Porcello has pitched 1073 1/3 innings after debuting as a 20-year-old in 2009. If not for a rough period in 2010 when he was sent down to the minors for a few weeks, Porcello would have been eligible for free agency after last season. Over the past 20 years, only 11 pitchers have pitched more than 900 innings through their Age-25 season like Porcello and had a WAR above two in their Age-25 season. Clayton Kershaw, Madison Bumgarner, Felix Hernandez and Matt Cain have yet to play through their Age-30 seasons, leaving six players for future comparison.' http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/red-sox-lock-up-rick-porcello/