'I have solved that by putting the negativity nellies on my blocked list of reading and it has made it easier to navigate through some excellent discussion, both pro and con.'-brvama. I thought we weren't supposed to label people on this site lest it be considered flame-baiting or something like that. Is that not true anymore? Isn't that rule in place to help avoid conflict between groups of people in order to facilitate civil debate? Yet here's a whole thread dedicated to slamming the actions of 'negative nellies'. Do you think that a thread like this will help or hurt the overall health of this site in regards to conflict between supposedly two different factions? Do you think this thread being allowed to exist will help or hurt the perception that there is bias in moderating? For example, would a thread bemoaning the continuous defending of the FO by the same people over and over be allowed? And If the term negative nellies is allowed here, what kind of label is allowed for people who always defend the FO? Problem is, after 4 years of really bad baseball and a likely 5th on the horizon, one would/should expect more negative than positive. If there was so much positive to talk about, we wouldn't be losing 90 games a season for the last 4 years. It's reality.