Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

2wins87

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,650

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by 2wins87

  1. 2wins87
    I wonder if they give him some reps in center this year just to give him a little flexibility. It seems like positional flexibility is starting to come back into vogue a bit these days. Having a guy that can play multiple up the middle positions would be exciting. And it could help him get in the lineup regularly when he comes up, even if he sticks at short long term.
  2. 2wins87
    Certainly seems possible to me. All of the guys ahead of them on MLB.com's list are likely to exceed their rookie limits this year. Probably not all of them will but each would be expected to individually. So if they both perform, yeah maybe.
  3. 2wins87
    Looking into stats and projections, I think Polanco's contract would have been pretty close to Kepler's had he not been suspended for half the season last year. Assuming he had the same rate stats for the full year he probably would have been worth about 2.5 WAR last year, about the same as Kepler, and they both project to be about 2.5-3 WAR players this year (according to Steamer). Kepler had a bit more consistency in his first couple of seasons, but overall they would have been in a very similar spot without the suspension. So the PED use and suspension might have cost Polanco a little less than $10 million in earnings. I'm generally not that into discussing the morality behind PED use, but it's interesting to see what the penalties of the league policy are now. I think for a more established player, the penalty wouldn't be much more than the lost earnings during the suspension, and it's hard to say how it might affect a younger player that gets busted before really getting established in the major leagues.
  4. 2wins87
    Also, I don't get the negativity on this deal. If it is around 5 mil per year and Polanco is just a 1 WAR per year it'd probably still be tradeable to a team that needs a stopgap SS or utility infielder. I think it's extremely unlikely that Polanco is worse than that and pretty likely he'll be more like a 2-3 WAR player.
  5. 2wins87
    Why would the Twins want to backload it that much (or Polanco for that matter)? They have payroll flexibility this year, and front-loading more would increase their future flexibility. So I'm thinking it'll be closer to 5 mil per year for the first 5 and the team options are probably significant raises, probably getting into the 10 million range.
  6. 2wins87
    Larnach snuck into the top 100 at Fangraphs. They've consistently been a bit higher on him than most others. Here's what they have to say:
  7. 2wins87
    "Plodder" is a little harsh from what I've heard. He will have to hit though.
  8. 2wins87
    I hope that him being a starter is still in their long term plans. I assume that Perez has the 5th spot to start the season unless something significant happens in spring training. In that case I would rather Romero starts the season in kind of a swingman role in the majors than as a starter in the minors. And I would also hope that Romero would be stretched out into a starting role when someone goes down with an injury (when is the last time we've been trough an entire season without one of the starters going down for a significant amount of time), or if their plans for Pineda or Perez change due to ineffectiveness or some other circumstance.
  9. 2wins87
    Agreed although I think the #6 ranking is perfectly fine. The guys behind him have plenty of question marks or are far enough away that they still have a lot of downside risk. I don't have a great feel for what kind of percentages we should apply to different outcomes, but once a hitter has spent at least a full season at AA or above, I think the projection systems like Steamer and ZiPS start to give a pretty good idea of the median short term expectation (I'm less convinced that projection systems do a good job for minor league pitchers at any level). And you can ballpark a projection for modest improvements from there. Rooker's rate stat projections on Fangraphs from Steamer (the Twins always seem to be one of the last released for ZiPS) are solid for a rookie. So it looks like based on his stats the median projection should be for a bit above average offensive projection a couple years down the line. This would probably be enough to be a marginal major leaguer at 1B or DH but you're probably looking at a more optimistic end of his projection if he's going to be a long term starting DH. This is pretty much in line with expectations when he was drafted, and the floor has maybe moved up a bit.
  10. 2wins87
    Pretty unfair to be comparing him to Acuña and Soto. That was never even close to the expectation for Rooker (or it never should have been). I don't know what you were expecting from a college senior drafted 35th overall, but so far he's progressed pretty well, though the question marks that were always there haven't magically disappeared either.
  11. 2wins87
    I've learned to be skeptical of high strikeout power bats in the minors. It seems very tough to make the jump to the majors without a bit better contact rate. That said, I like the reports that I've heard on how much effort he puts into studying and improving his swing, and he seems to be a guy who can make adjustments. There's a pretty good optimistic case to be made, but I expect the adjustment period to the majors to be rough. Hopefully he makes it through.
  12. 2wins87
    http://www.statcorner.com/pitch.php?id=626929 No numbers on called strikes exactly, but all indications are that he gets plenty of swinging strikes, so I would guess that there is nothing out of the ordinary about his called strike rate. His contact rate is consistently below league average, his swinging strike rate comfortably above average, and his swinging K rate as a percent of all strikeouts seems to fluctuate around league average. All of this adds up to a guy who has gets lots of whiffs but without a go-to pitch.
  13. 2wins87
    I don't think it's entirely bad luck when Thorpe was getting hit since he was getting hit very hard. Most of the home runs and a lot of the other XBHs against him came early in the season. But his K and BB rates were pretty much the same all season, which is definitely sort of odd. The scouting reports suggest he's always going to get guys out more with deception and surprise, which makes me think part of his problem early in the season was probably that hitters knew or were guessing what was coming a lot more often than they should have. Have there been any reports on him changing sequencing? Or was he tipping his pitches somehow?
  14. 2wins87
    http://www.statcorner.com/bat.php?id=668731 Yes, he was K'd looking more often than league average but actually K'd swinging slightly less than league average. Also worth noting that his K rate in April and May was 32%, but he seems to have made some pretty big adjustments and his K rate was at 20% for the rest of the season. Not sure how his looking/swinging splits might have changed between those periods.
  15. 2wins87
    I was very discouraged by Littell's initial appearances in the majors, but honestly watched very little Twins baseball in September. Did his curve improve at all against major leaguers? He seemed incapable of getting whiffs with it in his first few appearances, but I know his numbers improved some in September. I can't see him ever having success in the majors without a better secondary. Gonsalves, for example, I could see having success throwing a higher rate of secondaries, but I think hitters will continue to sit on either Littell's fastball or curveball and the results won't be pretty for him.
  16. 2wins87
    I'm a big fan of Miranda right now. He'd be my pick from this group to be in the top 10 next year. He's got some power now but I think there's more to come. His line at Ft Myers was hurt a lot by bad BABIP luck (and if you add his plate appearances from the playoffs, where he raked, his batting line improves quite a bit too). As mentioned in the write up his peripherals mostly held up there, and its rare to see that kind of strikeout rate combined with power.
  17. 2wins87
    Jeffers has actually gotten solid defensive reviews in his professional debut. I've actually heard a bit more concern (from John Sickels for one) over whether his offensive production holds up when he faces more advanced pitchers given that he was older than a lot of his competition this year. Given how well he's hit so far that's not really all that discouraging to hear. He'll just need to go out and continue to prove it. I'm feeling optimistic about him right now. I think there's a very realistic chance he turns into a starting backstop for the Twins a few years down the line.
  18. 2wins87
    Although I'm still curious if any of the writers have thoughts they would share on where he might slot on a prospect list.
  19. 2wins87
    Ah. I did not realize that. Astudillo must be a pretty rare case that he's been around that long, hasn't passed rookie limits, and still has a decent amount of MLB upside which could still be realized.
  20. 2wins87
    Given his history as a prospect this is maybe fitting, but Willians Astudillo is not in the book even though he's still Rookie eligible and probably a good enough prospect to crack everyone's top 50 (at most).
  21. 2wins87
    Good to see Vasquez moving up to AAA even though his first appearance didn't go all that well. I still don't understand why he spent so much time in A+ this year but once he proves that his repertoire works on AAA hitters it's just a matter of time before he gets a taste of the big leagues.
  22. 2wins87
    Most of the AA and AAA relievers have been doing this over the past month or two. So yes it seems to be an organizational strategy, probably not something they'll implement in the majors next year but they're clearly preparing their high minors relievers (and starters) to be used to it, so it seems likely that they'll want to try it with the big league club sometime in the future. If your relievers are good enough then I can see the utility, since your reliever gets to face the other teams best hitters the first time through the order, and once you get to the third time through the order they've still only seen your actual starting pitcher once. Your 4th and 5th relievers have to actually be better than your starting pitcher for the opener to make sense though. I feel like there have been quite a few runs scored off of the AA and AAA openers, though probably less than I think given I probably mostly only notice the times it doesn't work great.
  23. 2wins87
    I think Jorge Polanco's first cup of coffee was directly from Ft Myers. This was because he was already on the 40-man as an international signee and the Twins needed a fill in for an injury. He hit pretty well in a limited number of at bats.
  24. 2wins87
    This might be kind of telling since it seems that righties would be more able to pick up his grip from their angle in the box whereas lefties would be more blocked by his body. The evidence from Parker is certainly suggestive. I don't know if this is his main issue but it seems plausible.
  25. 2wins87
    He does get a lot of pop-ups so the damage on fly balls isn't as great for him as other guys. Being such a tall guy he probably has a higher release point than most guys which will cause hitters to get underneath his pitches a bit more. I wouldn't be surprised if he maintains a lower HR/FB rate than the league average even as he moves up. Chris Young is an example of a guy who was able to do this at the major league level (Chris Young was also a freakishly tall 6'10"). 25% of his flyballs have been harmless pop-ups this year. 31% were last year in single A. I would keep an eye on that number as he moves up, but I'd argue that his batted ball profile could be an advantage for him. He might give up more home runs than other guys, but hopefully less than expected per flyball hit against him. Given that BABIP is so low on flyballs that stay in the park, he could really limit baserunners given the solid control he's demonstrated so far too.
×
×
  • Create New...