I guess I'm on the other side of this debate, though to be honest, I wouldn't get worked up either way. We saw with the Span trade how easy it is to get a really good prospect when you have a reasonable contract on a player Dozier has done this 2 years in a row now, and Plouffe put together a pretty good season last year after teasing us with that Ruthian performance a while back. I'll be honest in that contract or no contract, I'm not sure I see either player spending much more than a couple years with the Twins. I'd add that I think both will be trade candidates as early as next season. Plouffe has Sano chasing him down, and there's some decent 2B options in Rosario, Escobar, and Polanco, all of whom are in the high minors/ML. You could in theory move one of them to that LF spot at some point, but beyond that, there really won't be room for either long term. That isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it will be the key factor in the true value of the contract. The question at hand is how reasonable it is for the player to reproduce that season and whether or not there is room for improvement. I think Dozier is a much more sure thing that Plouffe in that regards. He's done it for 2 years now, and I'd probably lean towards extending him. Bottom line is if he can continue to do what he's doing, the contract will be tradable. He's got 1 year at the league minimum followed by 3 seasons of arb. A 4 year deal with 2 options, or a 5 year deal with 1 is probably what you are talking about, and I'm guessing the total value of that deal would be something like 4/25 with 2 options or 5/35 with one (guessing the value of the options would be in the 8-10M range). Those are pretty reasonable contracts, and the Twins would have zero problems moving that if Dozier maintains his production. That would not be the case if they went year to year, as the extra year/options is what really makes that contract valuable. Given that Dozier has maintained this level of production for 2 seasons, and seems to have the work ethic needed to continue that, I say do it. As for Plouffe, that' a bit different. He has more of a "sure thing" chasing him down, and that sure thing (even with contact issues) still was quite impressive in AA in 2013. He's also only done this for a year, but unlike Dozier, he has some OF experience. I'd probably wait another year on him and see how things play out. That's me at least.