Just a few nits to pick here. I agree on 1, 3, and 5 (though I don't agree on how he's going to get to this one). But 2 and 4 really bug me. 2) Yeah, the guys at the top succeed more, but I don't think we can say that they rarely fail. We all saw the failure that was Delmon Young. He was number 1 on a few lists for a few years. Yes, injury can get in the way, but there are a lot of intangibles that don't show up in a box score and a lot of baseball skills that need to be learned. We (not necessarily you in this case) tend to chalk much of that up as 'luck' and write off what constitutes real skills and real adjustments since all major leaguers make, while not understanding that there was an actual change that drove that low BABIP into something a bit bigger. 4) I hear this argument with every prospect, and it's often an excuse to justify an action that many people are questioning. It's really a dangerous argument in my opinion. Aaron Hicks was not Carlos Gomez and Buxton is not Hicks. Yeah, they are different people, but that doesn't mean we should use that as an argument to justify the mistakes that were made with (in this case) both of them. Just because Buxton ranks a bit higher on a BA list doesn't mean that we should put him in the majors if he's not ready. I don't necessarily care if he's 'better' than say a Ryan Sweeney if we have to sit and watch him flail away at major league curveballs only to see him sent down to AAA after he's beaten. People handle that type of frustration differently, and while we can say that we see more natural talent in Buxton than say Gomez or Hicks, we know absolutely nothing of his (and their for that matter) character. If the Twins decide to send Buxton to Minneapolis this spring, I hope that is not b/c they forced themselves to select the lesser of two evils but because they think he's ready to hit major league pitching. What I know from last season was that he wasn't. Has that changed this offseason? Perhaps, but if he continues to be rather subpar this spring, then I really think it's best for the Twins and Buxton to let him spend some time in AAA honing those skills. As an added bonus, he will most likely be a better player for the Twins when he actually is ready. He really doesn't have much in terms of at bats in the high minors. That's largely due to injuries. Trying to force a Mike Trout timeline on him while forgetting the amount of time that he's missed really misses the point... Heck, trying to force a Mike Trout timeline on him is just silly. Trout's career thus far has the makings of a first ballot HOF. Buxton needs to be ready for the show before we can make that type of comparison.