I won't argue on turner. I'd note that Turner and Garver were both considered top college defenders (with Turner being the better defender). I haven't heard any indication that Garver doesn't have the defensive chops. I suspect he'll be better than Suzuki to be honest. He won't be Molina back there, but he should be at least an average defender. His bat is the question. he put up an .880 OPS on low A ball his first full year, but hasn't been nearly as good since. He got off to a horrible start in high A last year before heating up and finishing with reasonably respectable numbers (an OPS just shy of .700). That's not bad for a catcher. He got off to a much better start in AA this season, so I'm hoping that he figures it out later this year and posts an OPS north of .700. My biggest concern is that his K and BB rates have moved in the wrong direction as he's moved up the chain. BTW, just a note, but this is why we shouldn't put too much stock in Lamont Wade's numbers. I'm glad he's doing what he's doing, but the real test for him will be high A and AA. Garver is a good example on how a college player can beat up low A.