no, your original sample size came from your own self designed parameters of "below average revenue teams that won the WS over the last 15 years." If you truly want to examine the "history" you would look at "teams who won at least 95 games but failed in the post season, lost 2 of their 5 starters, and added strong starting pitching the next off season." Because that's what those of us who wanted to do just that are disappointed about. The Twins needed it, and they failed at it. The rest of your "sample size" is just noise. Twins revenues...noise. they have ample revenues to sign any FA on the market. Talk of revenues is just a diversionary tactic to let you talk about money, for the 1000th time. It has nothing to do with winning a WS, or the Twins strengths or weaknesses. Nor does your claimed business history, with which you attempt to browbeat other posters. That has zero relevance either. So speaking as a mod, cease and desist that tactic.