Nice bully rant, but you haven't addressed the OP's assertion. You've simply responded to "he does X" with "No, he doesnt." And then followed with the classic "Rocco played the game" argument.
And for the record,, there's at least some reasonable evidence for the OP's position. Clearly the organization, and to some degree Baldelli, have decided analytics drives decisions on removing starters. Taking BP and infield before games has been de-emphasized. Catchers go to one knee, even with runners on, because someone has decided pitch framing is more important than preventing runners from advancement. That's an assessment clearly based on analytics over what might be called fundamentals. They appear to me to have abandoned "no doubles" defense late in games they lead. These are just a few examples off the top of my head.
I don't know what weight Baldelli places on "fundamentals" vs "analytics," but I think it's a fair question. At the least one that deserves a better answer than a beat down.
For that matter, haven't we spent the past 4 years singing the praises of the organizations new found reliance on data and analytics?