Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

USAFChief

Twins Daily Contributor
  • Posts

    35,935
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    578

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by USAFChief

  1. Way to put pressure on this hack, offense.
  2. "Right where you left it." -Mrs Chief
  3. Nobody has "jerked around" Larnach. He's been given the advantages of a high draft pick and multiple MLB opportunities now. He's had injuries, but he's also failed to take advantage of those opportunities. That's on him
  4. More importantly, bring home a W, Kenta.
  5. Indeed. If by "mid-day form" you mean stretched out on my Ekornes with a frosty one.
  6. I wonder if Conger has kids. Hope so. That way the Twins could hire one as 1st base coach when Hank retires. You know...set up a Conger line.
  7. Just not enough thrust to reach the exit velocity required to overcome the heavy gravitational pull of .500
  8. Not C4's best effort. Probably better than Balazovich though.
  9. Tying run in the hole!! edit: now on deck!!!
  10. If you look closely, because I'm clumsy, you'll see I added on to your original post. ;)
  11. *, a couple three legit relievers, and 3, 4, and 5 hole hitters for the lineup. FTFY
  12. Balazovich is living up to my expectations.
  13. You said "swept." I'll repeat my offer. 60-1 on any amount you want. How about my $6000 against your $`100?
  14. I'll lay 60-1 they don't get swept. You name the amount.
  15. Man, this DayTwah offense is just relentless. //eyeroll
  16. https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/split.cgi?t=b&team=MIN&year=2023 Baseball reference is your friend.
  17. I don't like WAR at all, but IMO fWAR for pitchers is particularly bad. Fangraphs uses what they think should have happened for a pitcher, rather than any measure of what actually did happen. They do this by using FIP. They only consider HRs, BBs, Ks, and HBPs. Theoretically a pitcher could give up a base hit on every ball in play, but if there were no HRs, BBs, or HBPs fWAR would love him. If he managed to accumulate enough innings, he could lead the league in fWAR by giving up 6 hits and 3 runs per inning with 3 Ks mixed in. bWAR for pitchers uses RA/9 as its base measurement. For position players the primary difference between the two is what they use to measure defense. IMO there are huge issues with both WARs. Here's a decent explanation of both. https://www.samford.edu/sports-analytics/fans/2023/Sabermetrics-101-Understanding-the-Calculation-of-WAR#:~:text=Fangraphs allocates 570 WAR for,game compared to Baseball-Reference.
  18. Is that a dead animal on Anthony Lapanta's head?
  19. Dismal. Can't just continually throw breaking ball after breaking ball.
×
×
  • Create New...