Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

PDX Twin

Verified Member
  • Posts

    3,513
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by PDX Twin

  1. One thing that hasn't been said: Why was he playing so shallow at that point in the game? I think I remember that it used to be a cardinal rule for centerfielders to play deep enough that they could get back on any catchable fly ball. This would be especially important late in a close game where the defense is trying to prevent extra-base hits. Yes, he should have played the ball off the wall for a double given that he couldn't get to it. But shouldn't he have been positioned deeply enough to make the catch?
  2. Yippee, or maybe Wahoo! Some of us are going to have fun with that name this year. Thanks!
  3. An unrelated point (aren't they all?): I'm still showing up with a status of "Chattanooga Lookouts." Do I get to be a Blue Wahoo instead? Some people have accused me of being a Wahoo for many decades, so it's probably appropriate. On the other hand, I don't think anyone ever nominated me to be a Lookout --- too much responsibility!
  4. Anti-septic is always good.
  5. After today, it looks like Romero needs a league with a bigger plate. Or maybe just one where walks don't matter, like AAA. I'd pencil him off the roster until he gets it together.
  6. I can't say I'm surprised at this finding. My nickname for him is "The Big Whiff." I have a feeling that I'm not going to enjoy watching this year's Twins very much: K, K, BB, HR, K ... in a good inning.
  7. What makes me toward Oliva is that a strongly suspect (though I don't recall the exact nature of his injuries) that the medical knowledge of 2019 (or even of 1989) could have rebuilt his knee and allowed him to run again. Does anyone with a medical inclination have more information about (1) exactly what he did to his knee and (2) how successfully these problems are treated now?
  8. "And we all know that if a hitter doesn't have his lower half, he doesn't have much, which is how a guy with Miguel Sano's ability puts up a .228/.320/.417 slash line in 99 games between the majors and Triple-A in his age-25 season." This makes me appreciate all the more what Tony Oliva accomplished after his debilitating injuries.
  9. And Dozier always insisted on batting lead-off, which Molitor indulged...
  10. This is the key, for me. There are few players who are legitimately "difference makers," either on the field or in terms of attracting attendance. For everyone else, a rising prospect is a "cheap" and close substitute, so it's not worth paying a lot more than the basic wage. This is basic economics and I think that some of the analytics have demonstrated this to GMs. The players can rant and rave, but they can't really change the economic laws of nature any more than Ford or Chrysler can return to the days of the 1960s when there were no substitutes for their unreliable gas-guzzlers.
  11. I have a hard time working up a lot of sympathy for someone who wants $350m rather than $300m. All MLB players earn very high salaries, period. If there is a problem it is with the minor-league players.
  12. Downside of an academic schedule: It's hard to travel except in mid-winter and summer. Upside of impending retirement: Not any more!!!
  13. Some rational economic reasoning here. Extrapolation is very risky. I recall a wonderfully humorous article on this subject in the Economist's holiday issue a decade or so ago. One of their examples was that, if one extrapolated the trend at that time, by 2100 everyone in Chicago would be murdered every year!
  14. This might be a good time to talk contract extension ...
  15. I'm guessing that the Twins are pushing on all fronts: Rosario, Berrios, Kepler, and maybe Sano and Buxton, and that Polanco is simply the first for whom terms have been agreed. Others are likely to follow if they can get to an agreement, or not.
  16. We get Seattle games in Oregon, and I believe that they go out to Idaho and maybe Western Montana and parts of Utah as well. Their region seems comparable to the Twins'.
  17. It must be the shift. Play 4 firstbasemen and pitch the lefties inside.
  18. This must be the song the Twins sing when they Race to the Camp Down in Florida.
  19. Interesting, but many/most of these contracts are for more than one year, so it is pretty harsh (especially for situations like Darvish) to count the entire contract $ but not the entire contract-period wins.
  20. Funny. I just remember getting what seemed like a dozen Jerry Lumpe and Diego Segui cards before I finally got a Harmon Killebrew!
  21. Yes. It's easy, but dangerous, to forget that all of the numbers that we crunch are the result of human activity, controlled by adolescent and post-adolescent brains that are not always perfectly rational.
  22. I hear this a lot, and not just with Buxton. There's an assumption hidden in here that may not be valid: that it is easy for players to learn to bunt. Is that really true? We never hear anyone say "if he would learn to hit like Rod Carew." We never hear anyone say "if X would learn to field like Ozzie Smith." Is it true that bunting is a learnable in a way that hitting and fielding are not?
  23. A name that Dick and Bert will constantly mispronounce?
  24. And this, it seems to me, is the job of the new manager. Whatever happened in the Molitor era is water under the bridge. It's up to the manager and coaching staff to help make sure that players get the right kinds of support, encouragement, or discipline to make the most of their physical skills. Based on what I've read about Mr. Baldelli, I'm cautiously optimistic.
  25. I remember a few years ago Byron Buxton wore (and preferred) the number 7. It's at least possible that the quick retirement of that number was a response to a request from Buxton to switch his number to 7. I suppose that they could have just told him "No, we're saving that to retire later on," but if you're doing that then you've de facto already retired the number, and why postpone the celebration?
×
×
  • Create New...